This article challenges the idea that competition was central to Adam Smith’s thinking by scrutinizing the concept’s role in Smith’s work, particularly The Wealth of Nations. We will understand Smith’s perspective better if we avoid reading later developments of the concept, particularly in economics, back into Smith’s times and writings. Conversely, I argue that the division of labor is the governing idea providing the basic organizational structure of Wealth of Nations. Clarifying (and demoting) the role of competition in Smith’s thinking requires showing the centrality of the idea of the division of labor—the idea doing the major analytic work in his thinking. The argument contributes to recent reassessments of the scope and significance of Smith’s social theory and strengthens the view that his approach has more in common with historical and political sociology than with economics as currently configured.
AllanDavid. 2000. Philosophy and Politics in Later Stuart Scotland. East Linton: Tuckwell Press.
2.
AspromourgosTony. 2011. “Adam Smith and the Division of Labour among the Social Sciences.” Review of Political Economy23(1):81–94.
3.
AvineriShlomo. 1968. The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BackhouseRoger. 2002. The Penguin History of Economics. New York: Penguin.
5.
BerryChristopher J. 1997. Social Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
6.
BradleyMichael E. 2010. “Adam Smith’s System of Natural Liberty: Competition, Contestability, and Market Structures.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought32(2):237–62.
7.
BrennerRobert. 1977. “The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism.” New Left ReviewI/104:25–92.
8.
CernyPhilip G. 2016. “In the Shadow of Ordoliberalism: The Paradox of Neoliberalism in the 21st Century.” European Review of International Studies3(1):78–91.
9.
Chambers’s Encyclopaedia: A Dictionary of Universal Knowledge for the People, Vol. III. 1862. London: W. & R. Chambers.
10.
ChildJosiah. 1694. A Discourse of The Nature, Use, and Advantages of Trade: Proposing Some Considerations for the Promotion and Advancement Thereof by a Registry of Lands, Preventing the Exportation of Coyn, Lowering the Interest of Money, Inviting Foreign Families into England. London: Printed and are to be sold by Randal Taylor.
11.
CoserLewis. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.
12.
DannerPeter L. 1976. “Sympathy and Exchangeable Value: Keys to Adam Smith’s Social Philosophy.” Review of Social Economy34(3):317–31.
13.
DurkheimEmile. [1893] 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.
14.
EvenskyJerry. 2016. “The Wealth of Nations.” Pp. 67–88 in Adam Smith: His Life, Thought and Legacy, edited by HanleyR. P. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
EversWilliamson M. 1980. “Specialization and the Division of Labor in the Social Thought of Plato and Rousseau.” The Journal of Libertarian Studies4(1):45–64.
16.
FergusonAdam. [1767] 1966. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Edited by ForbesD. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
17.
HaakonssenKnudWinchDonald. 2006. “The Legacy of Adam Smith.” Pp. 366–94 in The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, edited by HaakonssenK. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HamiltonAlexanderMadisonJamesJayJohn. [1787–1788] 2008. The Federalist Papers. Edited by GoldmanL. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
HamowyRonald. 1968. “Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson, and the Division of Labour.” Economica35(139):249–59.
20.
HayekFriedrich A.2013. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Abingdon: Routledge Classics.
HearnJonathan. 2016. “Demos before Democracy: Ideas of Nation and Society in Adam Smith.” Journal of Classical Sociology6(2):396–414.
23.
HeilbronerRobert. 2000. The Worldly Philosophers. Revised 7th ed.New York: Penguin.
24.
HillLisa. 2007. “Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson and Karl Marx on the Division of Labour.” Journal of Classical Sociology7(3):339–66.
25.
HodgsonGeoffrey M. 2001. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. New York: Routledge.
26.
HontIstvan. 2005. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
HontIstvan. 2015. Politics in Commercial Society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith. Edited by KapossyB.SonenscherM. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
HorneThomas A. 1978. The Social Thought of Bernard Mandeville: Virtue and Commerce in Early Eighteenth Century England. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
29.
HosseiniHamid. 1998. “Seeking the Roots of Adam Smith’s Division of Labor in Medieval Persia.” History of Political Economy30(4):653–81.
30.
KalyvasAndreasKatznelsonIra. 2008. Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KennedyGavin. 2016. “Adam Smith: Some Popular Uses and Abuses.” Pp. 462–77 in Adam Smith: His: Life, Thought and Legacy, edited by HanleyR. P. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
ListFriedrich. 2005. National System of Political Economy, Vols 1–3. New York: Cosimo Classics.
33.
MandevilleBernard. [1714, 1729] 1988. The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, with commentary by KayeF. B. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
34.
MarxKarl. [1887] 1967. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. Translated by MooreS.AvelingE. Edited by EngelsF. New York: International Publishers.
35.
McCullochJohn Ramsey. 1843. The Principles of Political Economy, with some Inquiries Respecting Their Application and a Sketch of the Rise and Progress of the Science. Edinburgh: Printed for William and Charles Tait, and Longman and Co., London.
36.
McNultyPaul J. 1967. “A Note on the History of Perfect Competition.” Journal of Political Economy75(4):395–99.
37.
MeekRonald L. 1973. Studies in the Labour Theory of Value. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
38.
MeekRonald L.SkinnerAndrew S. 1973. “The Development of Adam Smith’s Ideas on the Division of Labour.” The Economic Journal83(332):1094–116.
39.
MillJohn Stuart. 1848. Principles of Political Economy, with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: J. W. Parker.
40.
Montesquieu. [1748] 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Edited by CohlerA. M.MillerB. C.StoneH. S. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MouhammedAdil H. 2007. “On Ibn Khaldun’s Contribution to Heterodox Political Economy.” History of Economics Review46:89–105.
42.
MullerJerry Z. 1993. Adam Smith in His Time and Ours. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
MunThomas. 1669. England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade, or, the Ballance of Our Forraign Trade Is the Rule of our Treasure. London: Printed by J. Flesher for Robert Horne at Gresham-College, in the first Court in Bishopgate-street.
44.
NorthDudley. [1691] 1846. Discourses upon Trade. Edinburgh: A. and C. Black.
45.
PolanyiKarl. 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
46.
PownallThomas. [1776] 1987. “A Letter from Governer Pownall to Adam Smith (Appendix A).” Pp. 337–76 in Correspondence of Adam Smith, edited by MossnerE. C.RossI. S. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
47.
RicardoDavid. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation. London: J. Murray.
48.
RichardsonGeorge B. 1975. “Adam Smith on Competition and Increasing Returns.” Pp. 350–60 in Essays on Adam Smith, edited by SkinnerA. S.WilsonT. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
49.
RosenbergNathan. 1965. “Adam Smith on the Division of Labour: Two Views or One?” Economica32(126):127–39.
50.
RossIan S. 1998. On The Wealth of Nations: Contemporary Responses to Adam Smith. Edited by RossI. S. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press.
51.
RousseauJean-Jacques. [1755] 1997. The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Edited by GourevitchV. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
SamuelsWarren J. 1973. “Adam Smith and the Economy as a System of Power.” Review of Social Economy31(2):123–37.
53.
SamuelsWarren J. 2011. Erasing the Invisible Hand: Essays on an Elusive and Misused Concept in Economics, with assistance from JohnsonM. F.PerryW. F. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
SkinnerAndrew S. 1981. “Sir James Steuart: Author of a System.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy28(1):20–42.
55.
SmithAdam. 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Edited by MeekR. L.RaphaelD. D.SteinP. G. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
56.
SmithAdam. [1776] 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols. Edited by CampbellR. H.SkinnerA. S. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
57.
SmithAdam. [1789] 1984. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by RaphaelD. D.MacfieA. L. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
58.
SmithAdam. 1985. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Edited by BryceJ. G. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
59.
SmithAdam. 1986. “The History of Astronomy.” Pp. 22–37 in The Essential Adam Smith, edited by HeilbronerR. L. New York: Norton.
60.
SpencerHerbert. 1971. Herbert Spencer: Structure, Function and Evolution. Edited by AndreskiS. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.
61.
SteuartJames. [1767] 1966. An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy, 2 vols. Edited by SkinnerA. S. Edinburgh: Published for the Scottish Economic Society by Oliver & Boyd.
62.
StiglerGeorge J. 1957. “Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated.” Journal of Political Economy65(1):1–17.
63.
SurowieckiJames. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. London: Abacus.
64.
TeichgraeberRichard F.III1987. “‘Less Abused Than I had Reason to Expect’: The Reception of WN in Britain, 1776–90.” The Historical Journal30(2):337–64.
65.
TrentmannFrank. 2008. Free Trade Nation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
66.
Vincent-LancrinStéphan. 2003. “Adam Smith and the Division of Labour: Is There a Difference between Organisation and Market?” Cambridge Journal of Economics27:209–24.
67.
WallersteinImmanuel. 1974. The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
68.
WestEdwin G. 1964. “Adam Smith’s Two Views of the Division of Labour.” Economica31(121):23–32.
69.
WestEdwin G. 1971. “Adam Smith and Rousseau’s Discourse on Inequality: Inspiration or Provocation?” Journal of Economic Issues5(2):56–70.
