This essay responds to German theorist Thomas Lemke’s call for a conversation between two distinct lines of reception of Foucault’s concept of biopolitics. The first line is comprised of sweeping historical perspectives on biopolitics, such as those of Giorgio Agamben and Antonio Negri, and the second is comprised of the more temporally focused perspectives of theorists such as Paul Rabinow, Nikolas Rose, and Catherine Waldby, whose biopolitical analyses concentrate on recent biotechnologies such as genetic techniques and the biobanking of human tissues. This essay develops this conversation by bringing the two lines to bear on the neoliberal “bioeconomy” that has developed over the past three decades and uses the perspective of Italian theorist Roberto Esposito to represent the first line. Esposito’s unique combination of Foucauldian biopolitics and the Maussean gift tradition provides a critical perspective that engages and challenges the neoliberal inclination of many theorists from the second line.
AgambenGiorgio. [1995] 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Heller-RoazenD.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
AndrewsLori B.1986. “My Body, My Property.” The Hastings Center Report16(5):28–38.
3.
AndrewsLori B.2005. “Harnessing the Benefits of Biobanks.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics33(1):22–30.
4.
BatailleGeorges.1985. Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927–1939. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
BeckerGaryElíasJulio Jorge. 2007. “Introducing Incentives in the Market for Live and Cadaveric Organ Donations.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives21(3):3–24.
6.
BeckerGaryEwaldFrançoisHarcourtBernard. 2012. “‘Becker on Ewald on Foucault on Becker’—American Neoliberalism and Michel Foucault’s 1979 Birth of Biopolitics Lectures: A Conversation with Gary Becker, François Ewald, and Bernard Harcourt.” Chicago Institute for Law and Economics Working Paper, No. 614 (2nd Series), Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper, No. 401.
7.
BehrentMichael C.2009. “Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault and the Free-market Creed, 1976–79.” Modern Intellectual History6(3):539–68.
8.
BehrentMichael C.2010. “Accidents Happen: François Ewald, the ‘Antirevolutionary’ Foucault, and the Intellectual Politics of the French Welfare State.” The Journal of Modern History82(3):585–624.
CampbellTimothy. 2008. “Bíos, Immunity, Life: The Thought of Roberto Esposito.” Pp. vii–xlii in Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy, by EspositoR.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
CohenLloyd R.1989. “Increasing the Supply of Transplant Organs: The Virtues of a Futures Market.” The George Washington Law Review58(1):1–51.
13.
CohenLloyd R.1995. Increasing the Supply of Transplant Organs: The Virtues of a Futures Market. New York: Springer.
14.
CooperMelinda. 2008. Life as Surplus: Biotechnology & Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle: The University of Washington Press.
15.
DanielsK. R.2000. “To Give or Sell Human Gametes—The Interplay between Pragmatics, Policy and Ethics.” Journal of Medical Ethics26(3):206–11.
16.
DeanMitchell. 2014.”Foucault’s ‘Apology’ for Neoliberalism.” Journal of Political Power7(3):433-42.
17.
DerridaJacques. [1991] 1992. Given Time: 1. Counterfeit Money. Translated by P. Kamuf.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
DonzelotJacques. 2008. “Michel Foucault and Liberal Intelligence.” Economy and Society42(1):115–34.
19.
EspositoRoberto. 1995. “Donner la technique.” La Revue du MAUSS6:190–206.
20.
EspositoRoberto. [2004] 2008. Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy. Translated by CampbellT.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
EspositoRoberto. [2006] 2008. “Totalitarianism or Biopolitics? Concerning a Philosophical Interpretation of the Twentieth Century.” Critical Inquiry34(4):633–44.
22.
EspositoRoberto. [1998] 2010. Communitas: The Origin and Destiny of Community. Translated by T. Campbell.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
EspositoRoberto. [2002] 2011. Immunitas: The Protection and Negation of Life. Translated by HanafiZ.Cambridge, UK: Polity.
24.
EspositoRoberto. 2013. “Community, Immunity, Biopolitics.” Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities18(3):83–90.
FarnetiRoberto. 2011. “The Immunitary Turn in Current Talk on Biopolitics: On Roberto Esposito’s Bíos.” Philosophy and Social Criticism37(8):955–62.
27.
FlewTerry. 2012. “Michel Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics and Contemporary Neo-Liberalism Debates.” Thesis Eleven108(1):44–65.
28.
FoucaultMichel. 2000. Power. Vol. 3 of The Essential Works of Foucault: 1954–1984. Edited by FaubionJ. D.New York: The New Press.
29.
FoucaultMichel. [2004] 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France de France, 1977–1978. Edited by SenellartM. Translated by BurchellG.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
FoucaultMichel. [2004] 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures from the Collège de France de France, 1978–1979. Edited by SennelartM. Translated by BurchellG.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
FranklinSarah. 2013. Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
FrowJohn. 1997. “Gift and Commodity.” Pp. 102–217 in Time & Commodity Culture: Essays in Cultural Theory and Postmodernity. Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
GodboutJacques T.2000. “Homo Donator versus Homo Oeconomicus.” Pp. 23–46 in Gifts and Interests, edited by VandeveldeA.Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.
HansmannHenry. 1989. “The Economics an Ethics of Markets for Human Organs.” Pp. 57–85 in Organ Transplantation Policy: Issues and Prospects, edited by BlumensteinJ. F.SloanF. A.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
HarawayDonna. 1991. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” Pp. 149–81 in Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
37.
HardtMichaelNegriAntonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Hesiod. 1914. Works and Days. Translated by Evelyn-WhiteH.G.New York: Macmillan.
39.
LemkeThomas. 2001. “‘The Birth of Bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-liberal Governmentality.” Economy and Society30(2):190–207.
40.
LemkeThomas. 2005. “‘A Zone of Indistinction’—A Critique of Giorgio Agamben’s Concept of Biopolitics.” Outlines7(1):3–13.
41.
LemkeThomas. 2011a. “Beyond Foucault: From Biopolitics to the Government of Life.” Pp. 165–82 in Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, edited by BröcklingU.KrasmannS.LemkeT.New York: Routledge.
42.
LemkeThomas. 2011b. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. Translated by TrumpE. F.New York: New York University Press.
43.
LockMargaret. 2001. “The Alienation of Body Tissue and the Biopolitics of Immortal Cell Lines.” Body and Society7(2–3):63–91.
44.
LockeJohn. [1690] 1988. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
MaussMarcel. [1925] 1990. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by HallsW. D.New York: Routledge.
46.
McNayLois. 2009. “Self as Enterprise: Dilemmas of Control and Resistance in Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics.” Theory, Culture & Society26(6):55–77.
47.
MeloniMaurizio. 2010. “Biopolitics for Philosophers: A Review of Bíos.” Economy and Society39(4):551–66.
48.
NovasCarlos. 2006. “The Political Economy of Hope: Patients’ Organizations, Science and Biovalue.” BioSocieties1(3):289–305.
49.
NovasCarlosRoseNikolas. 2000. “Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual.” Economy and Society29(4):485–513.
50.
Plato. 1902. The Dialogues of Plato (4 Vols.). Translated by JowettB.New York: Scribner’s Sons.
51.
RabinowPaul. 1992. “Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality.” Pp. 234–52 in Incorporations, edited by CraryJ.KwinterS.New York: Zone Books.
52.
RabinowPaul. 1994. “The Third Culture.” History of the Human Sciences7(2):53–64.
53.
RabinowPaul. 1996a. “Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality.” Pp. 91–111 in Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
RabinowPaul. 1996b. Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
RabinowPaul. 1996c. “Severing the Ties: Fragmentation and Dignity in Late Modernity.” Pp. 129–52 in Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
RabinowPaul. 1999. French DNA: Trouble in Purgatory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
RabinowPaul. 2008. “Afterword: Concept Work” Pp. 188–92 in Biosocialities, Genetics, and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities, edited by GibbonS.NovasC.New York: Routledge.
58.
RabinowPaulDan-CohenTalia. 2005. A Machine to Make a Future: Biotech Chronicles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Radcliffe-RichardsJanetDaarA. S.GuttmannR. D.HoffenbergR.KennedyI.LockM.SellsR. A.TilneyN.1998. “The Case for Allowing Kidney Sales.” Lancet351(9210):1950–52.
61.
RiddickFrank A.2003. “Cadaveric Organ Donation: Encouraging the Study of Motivation.” Transplantation76(4):748–51.
62.
RoseNikolas. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Biopower, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
RoseNikolasNovasCarlos. 2005. “Biological Citizenship.” Pp. 439–63 in Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, edited by OngA.CollierS.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
64.
RothmanDavid J.1996. “Bodily Integrity and the Socially Disadvantaged: The Traffic in Organs for Transplantation.” Pp. 35–41 in Organ and Tissue Donation: Ethical, Legal, and Policy Issues, edited by SpielmanB.Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
65.
Scheper-HughesNancy. 2004. “Parts Unknown: Undercover Ethnography of the Organs-trafficking Underworld.” Ethnography5(1):29–73.
66.
ScottRussell. 1981. The Body as Property. New York: Viking Press.
67.
TerrySharon F.TerryPatrick F.RauenKatherine A.UittoJouniBercovitch.Lionel G.2007. “Advocacy Groups as Research Organizations: The PXE International Example.” Nature Reviews Genetics8(February):157–64.
68.
TierneyThomas F.2006. “Suicidal Thoughts: Hobbes, Foucault, and the Right to Die”Philosophy & Social Criticism32(5):601–38.
69.
TierneyThomas F.2016. “Roberto Esposito’s ‘Affirmative Biopolitics’ and the Gift.” Theory, Culture, and Society33(2):53–76.
70.
TitmussRichard M.1971. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: George Allen & Unwin.
71.
WaldbyCatherine. 2000. The Visible Human Project: Informatic Bodies and Posthuman Medicine. London: Routledge.
72.
WaldbyCatherineCooperMelinda. 2010. “From Reproductive Work to Regenerative Labour: The Female Body and the Stem Cell Industries.” Feminist Theory11(1):3–22.
73.
WaldbyCatherineMitchellRobert. 2006. Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
74.
ZamoraDanielBehrentMichael C., eds. 2016. Foucault and Neoliberalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
