Sociologists have undertheorized the role of aesthetic judgment in group identification. The author argues that the communication of aesthetic judgments in face-to-face interaction powerfully works to confirm or deny feelings of group belonging. The author introduces the concept of “community sense,” the public face of shared aesthetic judgments that is communicated and upheld within a group. The author illustrates this concept through an ethnographic case study of an erotic arts club, a group predicated on achieving a shared sense of “good” and “bad” taste. The author shows how the community sense is formed, challenged, and sustained in interaction, examining three characteristics of aesthetic judgments—derivation in form, visceral force, and intersubjective validity—that together constitute a strong basis for feelings of belonging and distinction. This setting acts as a wedge to access larger theoretical concerns, as the author explore the relationship between aesthetic judgment and feelings of group belonging in diverse contexts.
AbbottAndrew. 1995. “Things of Boundaries.” Social Research62(4):857–82.
2.
AlexanderJeffrey C.2001. “The Long and Winding Road: Civil Repair of Intimate Injustice.” Sociological Theory19(3):371–400.
3.
AlexanderJeffrey C.2008. “Iconic Consciousness: The Material Feeling of Meaning.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26(5):782–94.
4.
ArendtHannah. [1977]1992. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, edited by BeinerR.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
ArendtHannah. [1961]2006. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin.
6.
BaxandallMichael. 1972. Painting and Experience in Fifteenth-century Italy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
BeckerHoward. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
BeiselNicola. 1993. “Morals versus Art: Censorship, the Politics of Interpretation, and the Victorian Nude.” American Sociological Review58(2):145–62.
9.
BeiselNicola. 1998. Imperiled Innocents: Anthony Comstock and Family Reproduction in Victorian America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BenzecryClaudio. 2011. The Opera Fanatic: Ethnography of an Obsession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
BoltanskiLucThévenotLaurent. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
BornGeorgina. 2010. “The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production.” Cultural Sociology4(2):171–208.
13.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
BourdieuPierre. 1996. Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
BrubakerRogersCooperFrederick. 2000. “Beyond ‘Identity.’” Theory and Society29(1):1–47.
16.
ButlerJudith. 1990. “The Force of Fantasy: Feminism, Mapplethorpe, and Discursive Excess.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies2(2):105–25.
17.
ChildressClaytonFriedkinNoah. 2012. “Cultural Reception and Production: The Social Construction of Meaning in Book Clubs.” American Sociological Review77(1):45–68.
18.
CraneDiana. 1987. The Transformation of the Avant-garde: The New York Art World, 1940–1985. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
de la FuenteEduardo. 2010. “The Artwork Made Me Do It: Introduction to the New Sociology of Art.” Thesis Eleven103(1):3–9.
20.
DeNoraTia. 2000. Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DeNoraTia. 2003. “Music Sociology: Getting the Music into the Action.” British Journal of Music Education20(2):165–77.
22.
DeNoraTiaKrzys AcordSophia. 2008. “Culture and the Arts: From Art Worlds to Arts-in-action.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science619(1):223–37.
23.
DiMaggioPaul. 1982. “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-century Boston.” Media, Culture, and Society4(1):33–50.
24.
DiMaggioPaul. 1987. “Classification in Art.” American Sociological Review52(4):440–55.
25.
EliasophNinaLichtermanPaul. 2003. “Culture in Interaction.” American Journal of Sociology108(4):735–94.
EmirbayerMustafaGoodwinJeff. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology99(6):1411–54.
28.
EyermanRon. 2006. “Toward a Meaningful Sociology of the Arts.” Pp. 13–34 in Myth, Meaning, and Performance: Toward a New Cultural Sociology of the Arts, edited by EyermanR.McCormickL.Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
29.
FarrellMichael. 2001. Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
FineGary A.1979. “Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little League Baseball Teams.” American Sociological Review44(5):733–45.
31.
FineGary A.1992. “The Culture of Production: Aesthetic Choices and Constraints in Culinary Work.” American Journal of Sociology97(5):1268–94.
32.
FineGary A.1995. “Wittgenstein’s Kitchen: Sharing Meaning in Restaurant Work.” Theory and Society24(2):245–69.
33.
FriedkinNoah E.JohnsenEugene C.2011. Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
GansHerbert. 1974. Popular Culture and High Culture. New York: Basic Books.
35.
GierynThomas F.1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review48(6):781–95.
36.
GoffmanErving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
37.
GoffmanErving. 1961. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
38.
GoffmanErving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press.
39.
Golden-BiddleKarenRaoHayagreeva. 1997. “Breaches in the Boardroom: Organizational Identity and Conflicts of Commitment in a Nonprofit Organization.” Organization Science8(6):593–611.
40.
GomartEmilieHennionAntoine. 1999. “A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users.” Sociological Review46(S):220–47.
41.
GrazianDavid. 2003. Blue Chicago: The Search for Authenticity in an Urban Blues Club. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
GronowJukka. 1997. The Sociology of Taste. London: Routledge.
43.
HaidtJonathan. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review108(4):814–34.
44.
HebdigeDick. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.
45.
HennionAntoine. 2003. “Music and Mediation: Towards a New Sociology of Music.” Pp. 88–91 in The Cultural Study of Music: A Critical Introduction, edited by ClaytonM.HerbertT.MiddletonR.New York: Routledge.
46.
HennionAntoine. 2004. “Pragmatics of Taste.” Pp. 131–44 in The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture, edited by JacobsM.HahrahanN.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
47.
HitlinStevenVaiseyStephan. 2013. “The New Sociology of Morality.” Annual Review of Sociology39:51–68.
48.
IgnatowGabriel. 2007. “Theories of Embodied Knowledge: New Directions for Cultural and Cognitive Sociology?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior37(2):115–35.
49.
KantImmanuel. [1790]2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by GuyerP.WoodA.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
KatzJack. 1999. How Emotions Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
KaufmanJason. 2004. “Endogenous Explanations in the Study of Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology30:335–57.
52.
KlettJoseph. 2014. “Sound on Sound: Situating Interaction in Sonic Object Settings.” Sociological Theory32(2):147–61.
53.
Krzys AcordSophia. 2010. “Beyond the Head: The Practical Work of Curating Contemporary Art.” Qualitative Sociology33(4):447–67.
54.
LamontMichele. 1992. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
LamontMichele. 2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
LamontMichele. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
LamontMicheleMolnarVirag. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
58.
LightAndrewSmithJohn, eds. 2005. The Aesthetics of Everyday Life. New York: Columbia University Press.
59.
LizardoOmar. 2006. “How Cultural Tastes Shape Personal Networks.” American Sociological Review71(5):778–807.
60.
LyotardJean-François. 1988. Peregrinations: Law, Form, Event. New York: Columbia University Press.
61.
MandokiKatya. 2007. Everyday Aesthetics: Prosaics, the Play of Culture and Social Identities. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
62.
MartinJohn Levi. 2011. The Explanation of Social Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
63.
McDonnellTerence E.2010. “Cultural Objects as Objects: Materiality, Urban Space, and the Interpretation of AIDS Media in Accra, Ghana.” American Journal of Sociology115(6):1800–52.
64.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
65.
MeyerBirgit. 2010. “Aesthetics of Persuasion: Global Christianity and Pentecostalism’s Sensational Forms.” South Atlantic Quarterly10(4):741–63.
66.
NeadLynda. 1992. The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity, and Sexuality. London: Routledge.
67.
PetersonRichard A.AnandNarasimhan. 2004. “The Production of Culture Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology30:311–34.
68.
PetersonRichard A.KernRoger M.1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.” American Sociological Review61(5):900–907.
69.
RiveraLauren. 2012. “Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms.” American Sociological Review77(6):999–1022.
70.
Rose-GreenlandFiona. 2013. “Seeing the Unseen: Prospective Loading and Knowledge Forms in Archaeological Discovery.” Qualitative Sociology36(3):251–77.
71.
RubioFernando D.2012. “The Material Production of the Spiral Jetty: A Study of Culture in the Making.” Cultural Sociology6(2):143–61.
72.
SaitoYuriko. 2007. Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73.
SchneiderhanErikKhanShamus. 2008. “Reasons and Inclusion: The Foundation of Deliberation.” Sociological Theory26(1):1–24.
74.
SchutzAlfred. 1953. “Common-sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research14(1):1–38.
75.
SilverDaniel. 2011. “The Moodiness of Action.” Sociological Theory29(3):199–222.
76.
SimmelGeorg. 1905. Kant. 16 Vorlesungen. Leipzig: Duncker and Humblott.
77.
SwidlerAnn. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review51(2):273–86.
TurnerJohnOakesPenny. 1986. “The Significance of the Social Identity Concept for Social Psychology with Reference to Individualism, Interactionism and Social Influence.” British Journal of Social Psychology25(3):237–52.
80.
VaiseyStephan, 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology114(6):1675–1715.
81.
VaiseyStephanLizardoOmar. 2010. “Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition?” Social Forces88(4):1595–1618.
82.
WaskulDennisVanniniPhillip. 2008. “Smell, Odor, and Somatic Work: Sense-making and Sensory Management.” Social Psychology Quarterly71(1):53–71.
83.
WitkinRobert. 1997. “Constructing a Sociology for an Icon of Aesthetic Modernity: Olympia Revisited.” Sociological Theory15(2):101–25.
84.
WitkinRobertDeNoraTia. 1997. “Aesthetic Materials and Aesthetic Agency.” Newsletter of the Sociology of Culture Section of the American Sociological Association12(1):1–6.
85.
WolffJanet. 1993. The Social Production of Art. New York: New York University Press.
86.
ZerilliLinda. 2005. “‘We Feel Our Freedom’: Imagination and Judgment in the Thought of Hannah Arendt.” Political Theory33(2):158–88.
87.
ZubrzyckiGenevieve. 2013. “Aesthetic Revolt and the Remaking of National Identity in Quebec, 1960–1969.” Theory and Society42(5):423–75.
