Emile Durkheim’s ideas on religion have long served as foundational blocks for sociological theories. Yet, a mystery remains over where Durkheim’s insights into religion came from and especially the event that opened his eyes to religion’s importance in social life. Durkheim never supplied details on this conversion, but he did credit Robertson Smith for his new understanding. Did Smith really play the key role in Durkheim’s turn to religion? This essay examines Durkheim’s revelation in 1895 by starting from a novel angle—the first edition of The Division of Labor and his original stage model with the “cult of nature” as the starting point for religion. Tracing the implications of his initial choice of naturism as the elementary religion, a choice he would later soundly reject as “the product of [a] delirious interpretation,” offers new insights into why Durkheim found Smith’s ideas so inspirational. It also sheds light on why Durkheim overhauled his theory of solidarity, discarding his famous distinction between mechanical and organic solidarity. In Robertson Smith’s work, Durkheim discovered a more inclusive and enduring basis of solidarity in the social universe.
AlexanderJeffrey. 1982. Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Berkeley: University of California
4.
AlpertHarry. 1961. Emile Durkheim and His Sociology. New York: Russell and Russell.
5.
BediakoGillian. 1995. “To Capture the Modern Universe of Thought, Religion of the Semites as an Attempt at a Christian Comparative Religion.” Pp. 118–30 in William Robertson Smith: Essays in Reassessment, edited by JohnstoneW.Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
6.
BediakoGillian. 1999. Primal Religion and the Bible: William Robertson Smith and His Heritage. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
7.
BeidelmanThomas. 1974. William Robertson Smith and the Sociological Study of Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BellahRobert. 1959. “Durkheim and History.” American Sociological Review24(4):447–61.
9.
BellahRobert. 2011. Religion in Human Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BesnardPhilippe. 1981. “Une Étude sur Durkheim et la politique.” Études durkheimiennes, Bulletin d’ information6:1–5.
11.
BesnardPhilippe. 1983. “Documents: Correspondence Concerning the Année Sociologique.” Pp. 40–70 in The Sociological Domain: The Durkheimians and the Founding of French Sociology, edited by BesnardP.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BlackJohnChrystalGeorge. 1912. The Life of William Robertson Smith. London: Adam and Charles Black.
13.
BoutrouxEmile. [1912] 1970. Historical Studies in Philosophy. Translated by RothwellFred. New York: Kennikat Press.
14.
CollinsRandall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
CollinsRandall. 2005. “The Durkheimian Movement in France and in World Sociology.” Pp. 101–35 in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, edited by AlexanderJ.SmithP.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FustelDe Coulanges. [1864] 1889. The Ancient City. Translated by SmallWillard. Boston: Lee and Shepard.
17.
DeploigeSimon. 1907. “Le Conflit de la morale et de la Sociologie.” Revue néo-scolastique14:329–92.
18.
DeploigeSimon. 1911. Le Conflit de la morale et de la sociologie. Louvain, BE: Institut Superieur de Philosophie.
19.
DurkheimEmile. [1885] 1978. “Review of Albert Schaeffle’sBau und Leben des Sozialen Korpers: Erster Band.” Pp. 93–114 in Emile Durkheim: On Institutional Analysis, edited by TraugottM.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
DurkheimEmile. [1886] 1975. “Review Herbert Spencer—Ecclesiastical Institutions: Being Part VI of the Principles of Sociology.” Pp. 13–23 in Durkheim on Religion, edited by PickeringW. S. F.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
21.
DurkheimEmile. [1887] 1975. “Review Guyau—L’Irréligion de l’avenir, étude de sociologie.” Pp. 24–38 in Durkheim on Religion, edited by PickeringW. S. F.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
22.
DurkheimEmile. [1888] 1978. “Introduction to the Sociology of the Family.” Pp. 205–28 in Emile Durkheim on Institutional Analysis, edited by TraugottM.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
DurkheimEmile. [1890] 1973. “The Principles of 1789 and Sociology.” Pp. 34–42 in Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society: Selected Writings, edited by BellahR.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
DurkheimEmile. 1893. De La Division Du Travail Social: Étude Sur L’ Organisation des Sociétés Supérieures. Paris: Félix Alcan.
25.
DurkheimEmile. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by HallsW. D.New York: Free Press.
26.
DurkheimEmile. 1895. “Origine du mariage dans ľespèce humaine d’après Westermarck.” Revue philosophique40:606–23.
27.
DurkheimEmile. 1897. Le Suicide: Étude de sociologie. Paris: Félix Alcan.
28.
DurkheimEmile. [1897] 1978. “Review of Antonio Labriola, Essais sur la conception matérialiste de l’histoire.” Pp. 123–30 in Emile Durkheim: On Institutional Analysis, edited by TraugottM.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
DurkheimEmile. 1898. “La prohibition de l’inceste et ses origines.” L’Année sociologique1:1–70.
30.
DurkheimEmile. 1902. De la division du travail social, avec une nouvelle préface intitulée “Quelques Remarques sur les groupements professionels.”Paris: Alcan.
31.
DurkheimEmile. [1902] 1985. “On Totemism.” Translated by JonesR. A.History of Sociology5:82–121.
32.
DurkheimEmile. 1907. “Lettres au Directeur de la Revue néo-scolastique.” Revue néo-scolastique14:606–7, 612–14.
33.
DurkheimEmile. [1907] 1982. “Influences upon Durkheim’s View of Sociology” [Two letters to the director, Revue neo-scolastique (Louvain)]. Translated by HallsW. D. Pp. 257–260 in The Rules of the Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method, edited by LukesS.New York: Free Press.
34.
DurkheimEmile. [1912] 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by FieldsKaren. New York: Free Press.
35.
Evans-PritchardEdward. 1965. Theories of Primitive Religion. Glasgow: Oxford University Press.
36.
FerneuilTh. 1889. Les principles de 1789 et la science sociale. Paris: Hachette.
37.
FournierMarcel. 2006. Marcel Mauss: A Biography. Translated by ToddJane Marie. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
FournierMarcel. 2013. Émile Durkheim: A Biography. Translated by MaceyDavid. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
39.
FrazerJames. 1887. Totemism. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black.
40.
FrazerJames.1890. The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion. London: Macmillan.
41.
FrazerJames. 1899. “Observations on Central Australian Totemism.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland28:281–86.
42.
GeigerRoger. 1972. “The Development of French Sociology: 1871–1905.” Dissertation, University of Michigan.
43.
GiddensAnthony. 1972. Emile Durkheim: Selected Writings. London: Cambridge University Press.
44.
GrossNeil. 2004. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–30 in Durkheim’s Philosophy Lectures: Notes from the Lycée de Sens Course, 1883–1884, edited by GrossN.JonesR.Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
45.
GuyauJean-Marie. [1887] 1897. The Non-religion of the Future. London: William Heinemann.
46.
HarrisMarvin. 1968. The Rise of Anthropological Theory. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
47.
HerrickJane. 1954. The Historical Thought of Fustel de Coulanges. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
48.
JohnstoneWilliam. 1995. William Robertson Smith: Essays in Reassessment. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
49.
JonesRobert. 1986. “The Role of Analogies and Exemplars in the Development of Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion.” American Journal of Sociology92(3):596–627.
50.
JonesRobert. 1993. “Durkheim and La Cité Antique: An Essay on The Origins of Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion.” Pp. 25–51 in Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Moralist, edited by TurnerS.London: Routledge.
51.
JonesRobert. 2005. The Secret of the Totem: Religion and Society from McLennan to Freud. New York: Columbia University Press.
52.
KuperAdam. 1985. “Durkheim’s Theory of Primitive Kinship.” British Journal of Sociology36:224–37.
53.
LaCapraDominick. 1972. Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Philosopher. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
54.
LalandeAndre. 1906. “Philosophy in France (1905).” Philosophical Review15(3):241–66.
55.
LukesSteven. 1972. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. New York: Harper and Row.
56.
MaasPaul. 1958. Textual Criticism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
MaryanskiAlexandra. Forthcoming. On the Origin of Religion: A Reanalysis of Émile Durkheim’s Theory of Religion.
58.
MaussMarcel. [1928] 1962. “Introduction to the First Edition.” Pp. 32–36 in Emile Durkheim’s Socialism, edited by GouldnerA.New York: Collier Books.
59.
MaussMarcel. [1930] 1983. “An Intellectual Self-portrait.” Pp. 139–51 in The Sociological Domain: The Durkheimians and the Founding of French Sociology, edited by BesnardP.London: Cambridge University Press.
60.
McLennanJohn. [1865] 1970. Primitive Marriage: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Form of Capture in Marriage Ceremonies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
McLennanJohn. [1869–70] 1896. “The Worship of Animals and Plants.” Pp. 491–569 in Studies in Ancient History, edited by McLennanE.PlattA.London: Macmillan.
62.
NandanYash. 1980. Emile Durkheim: Contributions to L’Année Sociologique. New York: Free Press.
63.
NisbetRobert. 1974. The Sociology of Emile Durkheim. New York: Oxford Press.
64.
OrruMarco. 1983. “The Ethics of Anomie: Jean Marie Guyau and Emile Durkheim.” British Journal of Sociology34(4):499–518.
65.
PeyreHenri. 1960. “Durkheim: The Man, His Time, and His Intellectual Background.” Pp. 3–31 in Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917, edited by WolffK.Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
66.
PickeringWilliam S. F.1984. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
67.
PickeringWilliam S. F.1998. “Introduction.” Pp. 2–12 In Durkheim’s Elementary Forms of Religious Life, edited by AllenN. J.PickeringW. S. F.Watts MillerW.New York: Routledge.
68.
PlatnickNormanCameronH. Don. 1977. “Cladistic Methods in Textual, Linguistic, and Phylogenetic Analysis.” Systematic Zoology26(4):380–85.
69.
PrendergastChristopher. 1983–84. “The Impact of Fustel de Coulanges’ La Cite antique on Durkheim’s Theories of Social Morphology and Social Solidarity.” Humboldt Journal of Social Relations11(1):53–73.
70.
Radcliffe-BrownAlfred R.1945. “Religion and Society.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland75:33–43.
71.
RévilleAlbert. 1883. Les religions Des Peuples Non-civilisés. Paris: Librairie Fischbacher.
72.
RichardGaston. [1923] 1975. “Dogmatic Atheism in the Sociology of Religion.” Pp. 228–76 in Durkheim on Religion, edited and translated by PickeringW. S. F.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
73.
RivièrePeter. 1995. “William Robertson Smith and John Ferguson McLennan: The Aberdeen Roots of British Social Anthropology.” Pp. 293–302 in William Robertson Smith: Essays in Reassessment, edited by JohnstoneW.Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
74.
Robertson SmithWilliam. [1882] 2002. The Prophets of Israel and Their Place in History. London: Transaction.
75.
Robertson SmithWilliam. [1885] 1963. Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia. Boston: Beacon Press.
76.
Robertson SmithWilliam. 1889. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites: First Series. The Fundamental Institutions. New York: A. Appleton and Company.
77.
Robertson SmithWilliam. 1894. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites: First Series. The Fundamental Institutions. London: Adam and Charles Black.
78.
SpencerHerbert. [1885] 1898. The Principles of Sociology. Vol. 111. New York: D. Appleton.
79.
StannerW. E. H.1975. “Reflections on Durkheim and Aboriginal Religion.” Pp. 277–303 in Durkheim on Religion, edited by PickeringW. S. F.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
80.
StrenskiIvan. 1998. “Durkheim’s Bougeois Theory of Sacrifice” Pp. 116–26 in On Durkheim’s Elementary Forms of Religious Life, edited by AllenN. J.PickeringW. S. F.Watts MillerW.London: Routledge.
81.
SumpfJoseph. 1965. “Durkheim et le probléme de l’étude sociologique de la religion.” Archives de sociologie des religions20:63–73.
82.
SwansonGuy. 1960. The Birth of the Gods: The Origin of Primitive Beliefs. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
83.
TrautmannThomas.1987. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
TiryakianEdward A.1979. “L’École durkheimenne à la recherche de la société perdue; le debut de la sociologie et son milieu culturel.” Cahiers internationaux de sociologie66:97–114.
86.
WallworkErnest. 1984. “Religion and Social Structure in the Division of Labor.” American Anthropologist86(1):43–64.
87.
WentworthWilliam. 1976. “Heritage Review: A Prophet of the Scientific Study of Religion.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion15:103–6.
88.
WestermarckEdward. 1891. The History of Human Marriage. London: Macmillan.
