History matters to nonprofit studies, ontologically as a sequence of past events and epistemologically as the study of past events. Contributing to the growing interest in methods, this study (1) evaluates the uses of historical methods in nonprofit studies by systematically reviewing articles published in NVSQ, Voluntas, and NML; (2) details archival research practices, highlighting identification of sources, criteria for inclusion/exclusion of sources, and analytical strategies; and (3) proposes uses of history in refining our approach to scholarship in nonprofit studies. Recognizing the field’s focus on quantitative methods, we argue that the humanities, of which history’s unique form of qualitative methods is a good example, are needed in the field as it wrestles with the future direction of the field and the impact of nonprofits and philanthropy on society.
AkingbolaK.BruntC. (2023). Reflexivity in nonprofit management research: A reflection on the role of self as researcher. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 34(2), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21564
2.
AllenW. S. (Ed.). (1984). The Nazi seizure of power: The experience of a single German town, 1922-1945 (Rev ed.). F. Watts.
3.
AndrewD. T. (1989). Philanthropy and police: London charity in the eighteenth century. Princeton University Press.
4.
ArchambaultE. (2001). Historical roots of the nonprofit sector in France. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001302003
5.
BaileyE. C. (2021). Advocacy and service delivery in the voluntary sector: Exploring the history of voluntary sector activities for new minority and migrant groups in East London, 1970s–1990s. Voluntas, 32(6), 1408–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00253-2
BeitoD. T. (2000). From mutual aid to the welfare state: Fraternal societies and social services, 1890-1967. University of North Carolina Press.
8.
BermanS. (1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics, 49(3), 401–429.
9.
BernholzL. (1999). The future of foundation history. Suggestions for research and practice. In LagemannE. (Ed.), Philanthropic foundations. New scholarship, new possibilities (pp. 259–275). Indiana University Press.
10.
BrudneyJ. L.DurdenT. K. (1993). Twenty years of the Journal of Voluntary Action Research/Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly: An Assessment of Past Trends and Future Directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764093223004
11.
BullockM. (2011). The oil prince’s legacy: Rockefeller philanthropy in China. Stanford University Press.
12.
BushouseB. K.WitkowskiG. R.AbramsonA. J. (2023). A history of ARNOVA at fifty. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_Suppl), 29s–67s. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221138262
13.
CarrE. (1961). What is history?Macmillan.
14.
CoraiolaD. M.FosterW. M.SuddabyR. (2015). Varieties of history in organization studies. In McLarenP. G.MillsA. J.WeatherbeeT. G. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to management and organizational history (pp. 206–221). Routledge.
15.
CouleT. M.DodgeJ.EikenberryA. M. (2022). Toward a typology of critical nonprofit studies: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(3), 478–506.
16.
DavisA. J. (2019). The medieval economy of salvation: Charity, commerce, and the rise of the hospital. Cornell University Press.
17.
DeanJ.WileyK. (2022). Critical theory, qualitative methods and the nonprofit and voluntary sector: An introduction to the special issue. Voluntary Sector Review, 13(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080521x16417596703081
18.
DeckerS. (2013). The silence of the archives: Business history, post-colonialism and archival ethnography. Management & Organizational History, 8(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2012.761491
19.
DeckerS.KippingM.WadhwaniR. D. (2015). New business histories! Plurality in business history research methods. Business History, 57(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2014.977870
20.
DunningC. (2023). No strings attached: Philanthropy, race, and donor control from Black power to Black Lives Matter. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211057390
21.
EikenberryA.MirabellaR.SandbergB. (2019). Reframing nonprofit organizations: Democracy, inclusion, and social change. Melvin & Leigh.
22.
EikenberryA. M.KluverJ. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.
23.
EttlingJ. (1981). The germ of laziness: Rockefeller philanthropy and public health in the New South. Harvard University Press.
24.
FeitM. E.SandbergB. (2022). The dissonance of “Doing good”: Fostering critical pedagogy to challenge the selective tradition of nonprofit management education. Public Integrity, 24(4–5), 486–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2034341
25.
FitzgibbonM. (1997). Accountability misplaced: Private social welfare agencies and the public in Cleveland, 1880-1920. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764097261003
26.
FordT. C. (2015). Liberated threads: Black women, style, and the global politics of soul. University of North Carolina Press.
27.
FordT. C. (2023). Our secret society: Mollie Moon and the glamour, money, and power behind the civil rights movement. Amistad.
28.
FoucaultM. (Ed.). (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1st American ed.). Pantheon Books.
29.
FreemanT. M. (2020). Madam C. J. Walker’s Gospel of Giving: black Women’s Philanthropy during Jim Crow. University of Illinois Press.
30.
FreemanT. M.Williams-PulferK. (2022). Liberating the archive, emancipating philanthropy: Philanthropic archival layering as a critical historical approach for researching voluntary action in marginalized communities. Voluntas, 33(6), 1114–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00402-1
31.
GaddisJ. L. (2002). The landscape of history: How historians map the past. Oxford University Press.
32.
GazleyB. (2022). The systematic literature review: Advantages and applications in nonprofit scholarship. Voluntas, 33(6), 1256–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00410-1
33.
GemelliG. (1998). The Ford Foundation and Europe, 1950’s-1970’s Cross-fertilization of learning in social science and management. European Interuniversity Press.
34.
GibsonP. A.StolcisG. B. (2006). Reenacting, retracing, and rediscovering history: Making a connection in the public administration curriculum. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2006.12001413
35.
GillM. J.GillD. J.RouletT. J. (2018). Constructing trustworthy historical narratives: Criteria, principles and techniques. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12262
36.
GladdenR. S. N.Levine DanielJ. (2022). The plantation’s fall and the nonprofit sector’s rise: Addressing the influence of the antebellum plantation on today’s nonprofit sector. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 44(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1959167
Guerra-PearsonF. (1998). Organizational forms and architectural space: Building meaning in charitable organizations in New York City, 1770 to 1920. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(4), 459–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764098274005
39.
HallP. D. (1999). The work of many hands: A response to Stanley N. Katz on the origins of the “serious study” of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 522–534.
40.
HallP. D. (2006). A historical overview of philanthropy, voluntary associations, and nonprofit organizations in the United States, 1600-2000. In SteinbergR.PowellW. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector. A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 32–65). Yale University Press.
41.
HambrickD. C.ChenM.-J. (2008). New academic fields as admittance-seeking social movements: The case of strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 32–54.
42.
HammackD. C. (1989). Private organizations, public purposes: Nonprofits and their archives. Journal of American History, 76(1), 181–191.
HewittN. A. (1990). Charity or mutual aid? Two perspectives on Latin women’s philanthropy in Tampa, Florida. In McCarthyK. (Ed.), Lady Bountiful Revisited: Women, philanthropy, and power (pp. 55–69). Rutgers University Press.
45.
HimmelfarbG. (Ed.). (1984). The idea of poverty: England in the early Industrial Age (1st ed.). Knopf.
46.
HineD. C. (1990). We specialize in the wholly impossible: The philanthropic work of black women. In McCarthyK. (Ed.), Lady Bountiful Revisited: Women, Philanthropy, and Power (pp. 70–93). Rutgers University Press.
47.
HowellM.PrevenierW. (2001). From reliable sources: An introduction to historical methods. Cornell University Press.
HuM.StoeckerR. (2024). Using participatory action research as a liberatory tool in nonprofit organizations. Public Integrity, 26, 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2023.2227387
50.
JenkinsK. (2005). On ’’What is history?’’ From Carr and Elton to Rorty and White. Routledge.
51.
JuC. B.TangS.-Y. (2011). Path dependence, critical junctures, and political contestation: The developmental trajectories of environmental NGOs in South Korea. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1048–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010378754
52.
KabaloP. (2009). A fifth nonprofit regime? Revisiting social origins theory using Jewish associational life as a new state model. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333333
53.
KangC. H.BaekY. M.KimE. H.-J. (2022). Half a century of NVSQ: Thematic stability across years and editors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(3), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211017676
54.
KaufmanJ. (2003). For the common good?: American civic life and the golden age of fraternity. Oxford University Press.
55.
KimM.RaggoP. (2022). Taking stock on how we research the third sector: Diversity, pluralism, and openness. Voluntas, 33(6), 1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-022-00548-6
56.
KippingM.WadhwaniR. D.BucheliM. (2014). Analyzing and interpreting historical sources: A basic methodology. In BucheliM.WadhwaniR. D. (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 305–329). Oxford University Press.
57.
LagemannE. C. (Ed.). (1989). The politics of knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, philanthropy, and public policy (1st ed.). Wesleyan University Press.
58.
LeachK. A.NickelsA. E.Davis-MatthewsM. (2025). Uncovering local knowledge in grassroots associations: An illustration of the critical reflexive approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 54, 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640241257831
59.
LeeM. (2010). The role of the YMCA in the origins of U.S. nonprofit management education. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(3), 277–293.
60.
LeeM. (2011). Historical milestones in the emergence of nonprofit public relations in the United States, 1900-1956. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009343021
61.
LeeM. (2021). Revitalizing historiography in public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 44(5), 1006–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2019.1677256
62.
LipartitoK. (2014). Historical sources and data. In BucheliM.WadhwaniR. D. (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 284–304). Oxford University Press.
63.
MacleanM.HarveyC.CleggS. R. (2016). Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 609–632.
64.
MaJ.KonrathS. (2018). A century of nonprofit studies: Scaling the knowledge of the field. Voluntas, 29(6), 1139–1158.
65.
MarbergA.KorziliusH.van KranenburgH. (2019). What is in a theme? Professionalization in nonprofit and nongovernmental organizations research. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(1), 113–131.
McCarthyK. D. (1990). Lady bountiful revisited: Women, philanthropy, and power. Rutgers University Press.
68.
McCarthyK. D. (1991). Women’s culture: American philanthropy and art, 1830-1930. University of Chicago Press.
69.
McCarthyK. D. (2003). American creed: Philanthropy and the rise of civil society, 1700-1865. University of Chicago.
70.
MendelS. (2017). Nonprofit first as grounding for nonprofit studies pedagogy, research, service to the community accreditation and national rankings. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 7(Special Issue I), 5–13.
71.
MinkowitzH.TwumasiA.BerrettJ. L.ChenX.StewartA. J. (2020). Checking in on the state of nonprofit scholarship: A review of recent research. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 6(2), 182–208. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.6.2.182-208
72.
MirabellaR.HoffmanT.TeoT. K.McDonaldM. (2019). The evolution of nonprofit management and philanthropic studies in the United States: Are We now a disciplinary field?Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 9(1), 63–84.
73.
MirabellaR.HvenmarkJ.LarssonO. S. (2015). Civil society education: International perspectives. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 5(4), 213–218.
74.
MirabellaR.WishN. B. (2000). The “Best place” debate: A comparison of graduate education programs for nonprofit managers. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 219–229.
75.
MoreyM. (2021). White philanthropy: Carnegie Corporation’s American dilemma and the making of a White World order. University of North Carolina Press.
76.
MunslowA. (Ed.). (2003). The new history (1st ed.). Routledge.
77.
MunslowA. (Ed.). (2006). Deconstructing history (2nd ed.). Routledge.
78.
NielsenW. A. (1972). The big foundations. Columbia University Press.
79.
NielsenW. A. (1979). The endangered sector. Columbia University Press.
80.
NielsenW. A. (Ed.). (1985). The golden donors: A new anatomy of the great foundations (1st ed.). Truman Talley Books.
81.
NovickP. (1988). That noble dream: The “objectivity question” and the American historical profession. Cambridge University Press.
82.
OlssonT. C. (2020). Agrarian crossings: Reformers and the remaking of the US and Mexican countryside. Princeton University Press.
83.
ParmarI. (2012). Foundations of the American century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the rise of American power. Columbia University Press.
84.
PaulV. (2020). Philanthropy: From Aristotle to Zuckerberg. (Vol. Electronic ed.) Bloomsbury Continuum.
85.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N. (2010). Is American public administration detached from historical context?American Review of Public Administration, 40(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074009341663
86.
RanciC. (2015). The long-term evolution of the government–Third sector partnership in Italy: Old wine in a new bottle?Voluntas, 26(6), 2311–2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9650-7
87.
RosenfieldP. L. (2014). A World of giving: Carnegie Corporation of New York-A century of international philanthropy. Public Affairs for the Carnegie Corporation.
88.
RowlinsonM.HassardJ.DeckerS. (2014). Research strategies for organizational history: A dialogue between historical theory and organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 250–274. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0203
89.
RueschemeyerD. (2003). Can one or a few cases yield theoretical gains? In MahoneyJ.RueschemeyerD. (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 305–336). Cambridge University Press.
90.
SalamonL.AnheierH. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3), 213–248.
91.
SandbergB. (2019). Critical perspectives on the history and development of the nonprofit sector in the United States. In EikenberryA.MirabellaR.SandbergB. (Eds.), Reframing nonprofit organizations: Democracy, inclusion, and social change (pp. 28–37). Melvin & Leigh.
92.
SchragZ. (2021). The Princeton guide to historical research. Princeton University Press.
93.
SchubertP.ResslerR. W.PaarlbergL. E.BoenigkS. (2023). The evolution of the nonprofit research field: An emerging scholar perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_Suppl), 102s–129s. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221078824
94.
SeawrightJ.GerringJ. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.
95.
SewellW. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. University of Chicago Press.
96.
ShierM. L.HandyF. (2014). Research Trends in Nonprofit Graduate Studies: A Growing Interdisciplinary Field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 812–831.
97.
SkocpolT.FiorinaM. P. (1999). Making sense of the civic engagement debate. In SkocpolT.FiorinaM. P. (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 1–26). Brookings Institution Press.
98.
SmithJ. (2020). What can history contribute to nonprofit education?Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 10(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.18666/jnel-2020-10790
99.
SmithJ. A. (1991). The idea brokers: think tanks and the rise of the new policy elite. The Free Press.
100.
SoskisB. (2020). A history of associational life and the nonprofit sector in the United States. In PowellW.BromleyP. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed., pp. 23–80). Stanford University Press.
101.
StapletonD. H. (1994). Archival sources and the study of American philanthropy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 5(2), 221–224.
102.
SteinacherG. (Ed.). (2017). Humanitarians at war: The Red Cross in the shadow of the Holocaust (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
103.
StinchcombeA. (2005). The logic of social research. University of Chicago Press.
StutzC.SachsS. (2018). Facing the normative challenges: The potential of reflexive historical research. Business & Society, 57(1), 98–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316681989
106.
SuddabyR. (2016). Toward a historical consciousness: Following the historic turn in management thought. M@n@gement, 19(1), 46–60.
107.
SuddabyR.FosterW. M.Quinn TrankC. (2010). Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage. In JoelB. A. C.LampelJ. (Eds.), The globalization of strategy research (Vol. 27, pp. 147–173). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
108.
ThompsonE. P. (1966). The making of the English working class. Vintage Books.
109.
ThorntonT. P. (1996). Handwriting in America: A Cultural History. Yale University Press.
110.
VaaraE.LambergJ.-A. (2016). Taking historical embeddedness seriously: Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 633–657.
111.
VillanuevaE. (2018). Decolonizing wealth: Indigenous wisdom to heal divides and restore balance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
112.
WalkM.AnderssonF. O. (2020). Where do nonprofit and civil society researchers publish? Perceptions of nonprofit journal quality. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 6(1), 79–95.
113.
WaltonJ. (1992). Making the theoretical case. In RaginC.BeckerH. (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 121–137). Cambridge University Press.
114.
WeberP.KrawczykK.EzeonuB. I.TuggleF. (2024). How to leverage action research to develop context-specific capacity building for civil society organizations. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 15(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2022-0041
115.
WeberP. (2021). In search of civil society: Disentangling associational practices and civil society conceptions in Germany. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(4), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020983915
116.
WeberP.WitkowskiG. R. (2016). Philanthropic disruptions: Changing nonprofit education for an engaged society. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(1), 91–106.
117.
WhiteH. V. (1973). Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe [by] Hayden White. Johns Hopkins University Press.
118.
WilsonR. (1998). Philanthropy in 18th-century Central Europe: Evangelical reform and commerce. Voluntas, 9(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021407113162
119.
WitkowskiG. R. (2015). Donors in a dictatorship: Giving, civil society, and democratic action in communist East Germany. Voluntas, 26(6), 2447–2461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9517-3
120.
WitkowskiG. R. (2021). Funny money: Philanthropic giving and the money illusion. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020941081
121.
YatesJ. (2014). Understanding historical methods in organization studies. In BucheliM.WadhwaniR. D. (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods (pp. 265–283). Oxford University Press.
122.
YoungD. R. (2001). Organizational identity in nonprofit organizations: Strategic and structural implications. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(2), 139–157.
123.
ZimmerA. (1999). Corporatism revisited—The legacy of history and the German nonprofit sector. Voluntas, 10(1), 37–49
