Governments continue to broaden the application of project management from large, costly infrastructure projects to a more diverse range of settings, but public administration scholarship has been criticized for not keeping pace with these trends. We instead focus on relatively smaller public projects by examining municipal strategic initiatives from the lens of project management. Results from 207 initiatives indicate that variables which emphasize an upfront shaping of conditions for success increase the likelihood of completion but do not necessarily reduce cost overruns and schedule delays among completed projects. However, variables which stress fixing issues midstream during implementation can potentially lead to improved cost and schedule performance. Results underscore the need for multidimensional theories of project performance to better understand how management practices impact different measures of performance.
AdewaleA. R.EstherM. M. (2012). The relationship between stakeholders involvement in strategic planning and organisations performance a study of the university of Venda. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 11(11), 1175–1190. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v11i11.7366
2.
BardachE. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes a law. MIT Press.
3.
BardhM.BokedalM.StenssonV. (2011). Project success: Application of Kotter’s functions of managers and leaders when evaluating project success—using the iron triangle. [Bachelor’s thesis, Jonkoping University]. Retrieved August 11, 2013, from http://hj.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:423698
BjorvatnT.WaldA. (2018). Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 876–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.05.003
6.
BlairD. G. (2015). Enhancing trust in government: Adoption of program management discipline can help government improve program delivery and service. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 789–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12460
7.
BoehmB. W.TurnerR. (2004). Balancing agility and discipline: A guide for the perplexed. Addison-Wesley.
8.
BoyneG. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug027
9.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest. Georgetown University Press.
10.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2013). Complex contracting. Government purchasing in the wake of the US Coast Guard’s deepwater program. Cambridge University Press.
11.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2018). Complex contracting: Management challenges and solutions. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 739–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12959
12.
CairnsB.HarrisM.HutchisonR.TrickerM. (2005). Improving performance? The adoption and implementation of quality systems in U.K. nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16(2), 135–151.
13.
CarayannisE. G.KwakY. H.AnbariF. T. (2005). The story of managing projects: An interdisciplinary approach. Praeger.
14.
CarmeliA.LeviA.PecceiR. (2021). Resilience and creative problem-solving capacities in project teams: A relational view. International Journal of Project Management, 39(5), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.03.007
15.
CockburnA. (2004). Crystal clear: A human-powered methodology for small teams. Addison-Wesley.
CrawfordL. H.HelmJ. (2009). Government and governance: The value of project management in the public sector. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 73–87.
18.
DouglasC. C.MerzE. L.MerzT. E. (2024). Process and politics surrounding the redevelopment of a municipal parking deck site in Houghton, Michigan. Public Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/07349149241231142
19.
EggersW. D.KettlD. F. (2023). Bridgebuilders: How governments can transcend boundaries to solve big problems. Harvard Business Review Press.
20.
El AsmarM.HannaA. S.LohW.-Y. (2016). Evaluating integrated project delivery using the project quarterback rating. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1), 04015046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001015
21.
EngwallM. (2012). PERT, polaris, and the realities of project execution. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211268898
22.
FernandezS.RaineyH. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector [Periodical]. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00570.x
23.
FeyS.KockA. (2022). Meeting challenges with resilience–How innovation projects deal with adversity. International Journal of Project Management, 40(8), 941–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.006
FlyvbjergB. (2017). The Oxford handbook of megaproject management. Oxford University Press.
26.
FlyvbjergB.GardnerD. (2023). How big things get done: The surprising factors that determine the fate of every project, from home renovations to space exploration and everything in between. Currency.
27.
FlyvbjergB.HolmM. S.BuhlS. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie?Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976273
28.
FredM. (2020). Local government projectification in practice–a multiple institutional logic perspective. Local Government Studies, 46(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1606799
29.
GeminoA.Horner ReichB.SerradorP. M. (2020). Agile, traditional, and hybrid approaches to project success: Is hybrid a poor second choice?Project Management Journal, 52(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082
GrandageA. J. (2021). Advancing capital project management. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(5), 618–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-01-2021-0003
GrandageA. J.MitchellD. (2023). Who has turned the project management lights on? A comparative analysis of transportation and information technology in US state governments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 43(3), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12346
34.
GreimanV. A. (2023). Global megaprojects: Lessons, case studies, and expert advice on international megaproject management. John Wiley & Sons.
35.
HodgsonD.FredM.BaileyS.HallP. (2019). The projectification of the public sector. Routledge.
36.
HoodC.DixonR. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less?: Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central Government. Oxford University Press.
37.
H PayneJ.Rodney TurnerJ. (1999). Company-wide project management: The planning and control of programmes of projects of different type. International Journal of Project Management, 17(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00005-2
38.
IkaL. A. (2009). Project success as a topic in project management journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20137
39.
IkaL. A.DialloA.ThuillierD. (2012). Critical success factors for world bank projects: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Project Management, 30(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.005
40.
IkaL. A.PintoJ. K. (2022). The “re-meaning” of project success: Updating and recalibrating for a modern project management. International Journal of Project Management, 40(7), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.001
41.
IkaL. A.PintoJ. K. (2023). Dont ask what makes projects successful, but under what circumstances they work: Recalibrating project success factors. In AnantatmulaV. S.ChakradharI. (Eds.), Research handbook on project performance (pp. 75–91). Edward Elgar Publishing.
42.
JensenA.ThuesenC.GeraldiJ. (2016). The projectification of everything: Projects as a human condition. Project Management Journal, 47(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700
43.
JugdevK.MüllerR. (2005). A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success. Project Management Journal, 36(4), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280503600403
44.
KaplanR. S.NortonD. P. (2005). Creating the office of strategy management (Working Paper 05-071). Division of Research, Harvard Business School. Retrieved July 28, 2013, from http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/05-071.pdf
45.
KasselD. S. (2016). Managing public sector projects: A strategic framework for success in an era of downsized government. Routledge.
46.
KerznerH.ZeitounA.VargasR. (2022). Project management next generation: The pillars for organizational excellence. Wiley.
47.
KutschE.HallM.TurnerN. (2016). Project resilience: The art of noticing, interpreting, preparing, containing and recovering. Routledge.
48.
LiuW.-H.CrossJ. A. (2016). A comprehensive model of project team technical performance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1150–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.011
MergelI.GanapatiS.WhitfordA. B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 7–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13202
51.
MillerR.LessardD. R. (2001). The strategic management of large engineering projects: Shaping institutions, risks, and governance. MIT press.
52.
MitchellD. (2018). To monitor or intervene? City managers and the implementation of strategic initiatives. Public Administration, 96(1), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12381
53.
MitchellD. (2019). It all depends, but on what? Testing contingency in public strategic implementation. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(4), 783–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1523063
54.
MitchellD. (2020). Toward a theory of public strategic implementation. Governance and Management Review, 5(1), 17–37.
55.
MitchellD. (2022). Bought in? The contingent effect of stakeholder support upon strategic implementation success in American municipalities. Public Management Review, 24(5), 773–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1862289
56.
MitchellD.KanaanD.StoeckelS.MyserS. (2021). Retiring the golden hammer: Identifying situational practices for public strategy implementation. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 7(3), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.7.3.343-368
57.
MitchellD.LarsonS. E.ColantonioC.NguyenC. (2018). Planning for change: Incorporating contextual implementation design into strategic planning. State and Local Government Review, 50(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x18785695
58.
MitchellD.MitchellS. (2024). Don’t go chasing waterfalls? How complexity demands more agile project management approaches to municipal strategy implementation. State and Local Government Review, 56(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x231215056
59.
MorrisP. W. (2011). A brief history of project management. In MorrisP. W.PintoJ. K.SoderlundJ. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of project management (pp. 16–36). Oxford.
60.
MorrisP. W. (2013). Reconstructing project management. Wiley-Blackwell.
61.
MüllerR.JugdevK. (2012). Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott–the elucidation of project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(4), 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211269040
62.
NaderpajouhN.MatinheikkiJ.KeeysL. A.AldrichD. P.LinkovI. (2020). Resilience and projects: An interdisciplinary crossroad. Project Leadership and Society, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2020.100001
63.
O'TooleL. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52.
64.
PatanakulP.KwakY. H.ZwikaelO.LiuM. (2016). What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects?International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.001
65.
PavezI.GómezH.LiuC.GonzálezV. A. (2022). Measuring project team performance: A review and conceptualization. International Journal of Project Management, 40(8), 951–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.11.001
66.
PintoJ. K. (2000). Understanding the role of politics in successful project management. International Journal of Project Management, 18(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00073-8
67.
PintoJ. K.CovinJ. G. (1989). Critical factors in project implementation: A comparison of construction and R&D projects. Technovation, 9(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(89)90040-0
68.
PintoJ. K.PrescottJ. E. (1988). Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. Journal of Management, 14(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400102
69.
PipercaS.FloricelS. (2023). Understanding project resilience: Designed, cultivated or emergent?International Journal of Project Management, 41(3), 102453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102453
70.
PoisterT. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 70, S246–S254.
71.
PressmanJ. L.WildavskyA. B. (1974). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. . . a Saga of the Economic Development Administration. U. of California P.
72.
Project Management Institute. (2017). Project management institute body of knowledge. Sixth Edition Project Management Institute.
73.
RamJ.CorkindaleD. (2014). How “critical” are the critical success factors (CSFs)? Examining the role of CSFs for ERP. Business Process Management Journal, 20(1), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2012-0127
74.
RoweS. F. (2020). Project management for small projects. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
75.
SatheeshS. A.VerweijS.van MeerkerkI.BusscherT.ArtsJ. (2023). The impact of boundary spanning by public managers on collaboration and infrastructure project performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(2), 418–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2137212
76.
SeldenS. C.SowaJ. E. (2004). Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: Prospects and problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh025
77.
SerradorP.PintoJ. K. (2015). Does Agile work?—A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006
78.
ShenharA.HolzmannV. (2017). The three secrets of megaproject success: Clear strategic vision, total alignment, and adapting to complexity. Project Management Journal, 48(6), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800604
79.
SivasubramaniamN.LiebowitzS. J.LackmanC. L. (2012). Determinants of new product development team performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00940.x
SöderlundJ. (2002). On the development of project management research: Schools of thought and critique. International Project Management Journal, 8(1), 20–31.
82.
SongM.MeierK. J. (2018). Citizen satisfaction and the Kaleidoscope of government performance: How multiple stakeholders see government performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy006
83.
SrivannaboonS.MilosevicD. Z. (2006). A two-way influence between business strategy and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 24(6), 493–505.
TalbotC. (2010). Theories of performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford University Press.
86.
TangM.WangY.YangY. (2023). Political influences of stakeholders on early termination of public-private partnerships: A study on China’s toll road projects. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(6), 1354–1381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2204081
87.
ToorS.-U.-R.OgunlanaS. O. (2010). Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.005
88.
TurnerR.LedwithA.KellyJ. (2010). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Matching processes to the nature of the firm. International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.005
89.
TurnerR.LedwithA.KellyJ. (2012). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Tailoring the practices to the size of company. Management Decision, 50(5), 942–957. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227627
90.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. (September17).
91.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2020). Cost estimating and assessment guide: Best practices for developing and managing program costs. U.S. Government Accountability Office.
92.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2021). High-risk series: Dedicated leadership needed to address limited progress in most high-risk areas.
93.
WalkerR. M.BoyneG. A.BrewerG. A. (2012). Public management and performance: Research directions. Cambridge University Press.
94.
WeibleC. M.SabatierP. A. (Ed.) (2017). Theories of the policy process (4th ed.). Westview Press.
95.
WhyteJ.NaderpajouhN.CleggS.MatousP.PollackJ.CrawfordL. (2022). Project leadership: A research agenda for a changing world. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100044
96.
WilsonJ. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.
97.
ZarghamiS. A.ZwikaelO. (2022). Measuring project resilience–learning from the past to enhance decision making in the face of disruption. Decision Support Systems, 160, 113831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113831
98.
ZhangS.ZhangF.XueB.WangD.LiuB. (2023). Unpacking resilience of project organizations: A capability-based conceptualization and measurement of project resilience. International Journal of Project Management, 41(8), 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102541
