This study provides a systematic review of the current state of research on sustainability practices in the public sector exploring the growth trajectory, emerging themes, and future directions. Sixty publications (2009–2023) were selected and diligently examined to reach insightful results using the Biblioshiny tool and content analysis. Through thematic mapping, the emerging sustainability practices in the public sector, including green HRM, green and e-procurement, circular business model, sustainable reporting and disclosures, and triple-bottom-line framework, were found. Furthermore, trending topics, word frequency, and document citations indicate that a growing body of literature on sustainability practices is more focused on environmental concerns rather than the long-term orientation. Further research is required to examine the integration of sustainability concerns in the organizational strategy, technology-driven sustainable practices, and assessment of the impact of regulatory frameworks and incentives on encouraging public sector organizations to adopt and prioritize sustainability initiatives.
AbidN.MarchesaniF.CeciF.MasciarelliF.AhmadF. (2022). Cities trajectories in the digital era: Exploring the impact of technological advancement and institutional quality on environmental and social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, 134378.
2.
AdebayoV. O. (2015). Examining the implantation of sustainability into state procurement decision models: An experiential overview of the Nigerian public sector. In 2015 World congress on sustainable technologies (WCST) (pp. 71–76). London, UK, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
3.
AdebamboH. O.AshariH.NordinN. (2014). Antecedents and outcome of sustainable environmental manufacturing practices. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(3), 147–159.
4.
AggarwalP.AgarwalaT. (2023). Relationship of green human resource management with environmental performance: Mediating effect of green organizational culture. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(7), 2351–2376. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0474
5.
AgrifoglioR.MetalloC.Di NautaP. (2021). Understanding knowledge management in public organizations through the organizational knowing perspective: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Public Organization Review, 21, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00480-7
6.
AishahR. S.ChewB. C.SaptariA. (2022). A process of adopting green information technology in Malaysia. Suranaree Journal of Science & Technology, 29(4), 1–11.
7.
AkterS.UddinM. H.TajuddinA. H. (2021). Knowledge mapping of microfinance performance research: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-08-2020-0545
8.
AlNuaimiB. K.KhanM. (2019). Public-sector green procurement in the United Arab Emirates: Innovation capability and commitment to change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.090
9.
AustI.MatthewsB.Muller-CamenM. (2020). Common good HRM: A paradigm shift in sustainable HRM?Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705
10.
BaahC.JinZ.TangL. (2020). Organizational and regulatory stakeholder pressures friends or foes to green logistics practices and financial performance: Investigating corporate reputation as a missing link. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119125
11.
BabatundeS. O.EkundayoD.UdeajaC.AbubakarU. O. (2022). An investigation into the sustainability practices in PPP infrastructure projects: A case of Nigeria. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-04-2020-0048
12.
BareghehA.RowleyJ.SambrookS. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
13.
BarkemeyerR. (2011). Corporate perceptions of sustainability challenges in developed and developing countries: Constituting a CSR divide?Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111141521
14.
BhardwajB. R. (2016). Role of green policy on sustainable supply chain management: A model for implementing corporate social responsibility (CSR). Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(2), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2013-0077
15.
BrownK.HallW. L.SnookM. H.GarvinK. (2010). Sustainable land development and restoration: Decision consequence analysis. Butterworth-Heinemann.
16.
CamposV.SanchisJ. R.EjarqueA. T. (2023). Assessing the effect of the economy for the common good system on business performance. Systems, 11(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020106
17.
ChamsN.García-BlandónJ. (2019). On the importance of sustainable human resource management for the adoption of sustainable development goals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.006
18.
Correa-QuezadaR.del Río-RamaM. D. L. C.Maldonado-ErazoC. P.García-VélezD. F. (2021). Corporate social responsibility. State of the question in Ecuador. In Peris-OrtizM.MárquezP.GomezJ. A.López-SiebenM. (Eds.), Progress in ethical practices of businesses. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60727-2_5
19.
D’AgostinoM. J.SchwesterR.CarrizalesT.MelitskiJ. (2011). A study of e-government and e-governance: An empirical examination of municipal websites. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 3–25.
20.
DemirciogluM. A. (2023). The effects of innovation climate on employee job satisfaction and affective commitment: Findings from public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 130–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X211043559
21.
Di VaioA.HassanR.AlavoineC. (2022). Data intelligence and analytics: A bibliometric analysis of human–Artificial intelligence in public sector decision-making effectiveness. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2397-5_39
22.
DjenR. A.NurmandiA.MuallidinI.KurniawanD.LoilatuM. J. (2022). Artificial intelligence: Bibliometric analysis in government studies. In YangX. S.SherrattS.DeyN.JoshiA. (Eds.), In Proceedings of seventh international congress on information and communication technology: ICICT 2022 (Vol. 4, pp. 411–418). Springer.
23.
DonthuN.KumarS.MukherjeeD.PandeyN.LimW. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
24.
DrempeticS.KleinC.ZwergelB. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
25.
ElkingtonJ. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishers.
26.
FathulW. (2013). The antecedents and impacts of green eProcurement infrastructure: Evidence from the Indonesian public sector. International Journal of internet Protocol Technology, 7(4), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIPT.2013.058648
27.
FigueiraI.DominguesA. R.CaeiroS.PainhoM.AntunesP.SantosR. VideiraN.WalkerR.M.HuisinghD.RamosT. B. (2018). Sustainability policies and practices in public sector organizations: The case of the Portuguese Central Public Administration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.244
28.
FulgenceS. E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in Tanzania. In VertigansS.IdowuS.SchmidpeterR. (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Sub-Saharan Africa: Sustainable development in its embryonic form (pp. 111–152). Springer.
29.
Gaviria-MarinM.MerigóJ. M.Baier-FuentesH. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
30.
GetzD. (2009). Policy for sustainable and responsible festivals and events: Institutionalization of a new paradigm. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 1(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407960802703524
GoodmanM. B. (2001). Symposium on sustainability – profiles in leadership. NYC, Corporate Communication Institute.
33.
GreenlandS.SaleemM.MisraR.MasonJ. (2022). Sustainable management education and an empirical five-pillar model of sustainability. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100658
34.
GueaI. H. V.UbandobA. T.PromentillacM. A. B.TancR. R. (2019). Determining the causality between drivers of circular economy using the DEMATEL framework. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 76, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1976021
35.
GuthrieJ.BallA.FarnetiF. (2010). Advancing sustainable management of public and not for profit organizations. Public Management Review, 12(4), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.496254
36.
HaleyB. (2017). Designing the public sector to promote sustainability transitions: Institutional principles and a case study of ARPA-E. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 25, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.002
37.
HawkenP. (2007). Blessed unrest: How the largest movement in the world came into being, and why no one saw it coming. Viking Penguin books.
38.
HecimovicA.Martinov-BennieN. (2023). Audit report construction: Public sector organisation perspectives within a non-financial information context. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(2), 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-09-2021-0135
39.
Heras-SaizarbitoriaI.GarcíaM.BoiralO.de JunguituA. D. (2020). The use of eco-efficiency indicators by environmental frontrunner companies. Ecological Indicators, 115, 106451.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106451
40.
HossainM. M.RanaT.NaharS.RahmanM. J.LemaA. C. (2023). Regulatory influence on sustainability reporting: Evidence from Murray–Darling Basin Authority in Australia. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(5), 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2020-0943
41.
Huss-LedermanS.DeeringB. (2019). Investigating environmental sustainability in an English writing course for international students: PBL as an on-ramp to academic belonging. In AdrianG. -V. (Ed.), Project-based learning in second language acquisition (pp. 117–131). Routledge.
42.
JabbourC. J. C.de Sousa JabbourA. B. L. (2016). Green human resource management and green supply chain management: Linking two emerging agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1824–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.052
43.
JacobsenS. S.KorsgaardS.Günzel-JensenF. (2020). Towards a typology of sustainability practices: A study of the potentials and challenges of sustainable practices at the firm level. Sustainability, 12(12), 5166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125166
44.
JainJ.WaliaN.SinghS.JainE. (2021). Mapping the field of behavioural biases: A literature review using bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 72, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00215-y
45.
JanA. A.LaiF. W.SiddiqueJ.ZahidM.AliS. E. A. (2023). A walk of corporate sustainability towards sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis of literature from 2005 to 2021. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 36521–36532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24842-4
46.
JangY. J. (2016). Environmental sustainability management in the foodservice industry: Understanding the antecedents and consequences. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 19(5), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2016.1185880
47.
JärlströmM.SaruE.VanhalaS. (2018). Sustainable human resource management with salience of stakeholders: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3310-8
48.
JenaL. K.SinghS. K.PradhanR. K.PanigrahyN. P.KesariL. (2018). Self-efficacy and workplace wellbeing, moderating role of sustainability practices. An International Journal of Benchmarking, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2018-0219.
49.
KleinN.RamosT. B.DeutzP. (2022). Factors and strategies for circularity implementation in the public sector: An organisational change management approach for sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2215
50.
KuchtaD.Mrzygłocka-ChojnackaJ. (2020). An approach to increase the sustainability of projects and their outcomes in public sector through improving project definition. Sustainability, 12(12), 4804. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124804
51.
KumariA.SaharanT. (2020). Knowledge management as a catalyst to sustainable development in banking industry. In 2020 International conference on computer science, engineering and applications (ICCSEA) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
52.
LăzăroiuG.IonescuL.UțăC.HurloiuI.AndronieM.DijmărescuI. (2020). Environmentally responsible behavior and sustainability policy adoption in green public procurement. Sustainability, 12(5), 2110.
53.
LevittT. (2016). Partners for good: Business, government and the third sector. Routledge.
54.
LewandowskiM. (2018). Public sector and circular business models: From public support towards implementation through design. In MoratisL.MelissenF.IdowuS. (Eds.), Sustainable business models: principles, promise, and practice (pp. 85–101). Springer.
55.
LiW.AbdallaA. A.MohammadT.KhassawnehO.ParveenM. (2023). Towards examining the link between green HRM practices and employee green in-role behavior: Spiritual leadership as a moderator. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 383–396. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S396114
56.
LinnenlueckeM. K.RussellS. V.GriffithsA. (2009). Subcultures and sustainability practices: The impact on understanding corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(7), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.609
57.
LiuJ.MaY.AppolloniA.ChengW. (2021). How do external stakeholders drive the green public procurement practice? An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Public Procurement, 21(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-04-2020-0035
58.
MaL.Umair AshrafR.AhtishamulHaqM.FanX. (2022). Hurdles on the way to sustainable development in the education sector of China. Sustainability, 15(1), 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010217
59.
MajidS.ZhangX.KhaskheliM. B.HongF.KingP. J. H.ShamsiI. H. (2023). Eco-efficiency, environmental and sustainable innovation in recycling energy and their effect on business performance: Evidence from European SMEs. Sustainability, 15(12), 9465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129465
60.
MarouliC. (2021). Sustainability education for the future? Challenges and implications for education and pedagogy in the 21st century. Sustainability, 13(5), 2901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052901
61.
MarounW.LodhiaS. (2017). Sustainability and integrated reporting by the public sector and not-for-profit organizations. In VilliersC.MarounW. (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and integrated reporting (pp. 101–120). Routledge.
62.
MasriH. A.JaaronA. A. M. (2017). Assessing green human resources management practices in Palestinian manufacturing context: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.087
63.
MirchandaniD.IkerdJ. (2008). Building and maintaining sustainable organizations. Organization Management Journal, 5(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2008.6
64.
MishraR. K.SarkarS.KiranmaiJ. (2014). Green HRM: Innovative approach in Indian public enterprises. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1504/WRSTSD.2014.062374
65.
MishraR. K.SinghP.SarkarS. (2017). Rethinking CSR: The case of the oil and gas sector in India. In JoseP. D. (Ed.), Corporations and sustainability (pp. 179–196). Routledge.
66.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
67.
MongeonP.Paul-HusA. (2016). The journal coverage of web of science and scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
68.
MunjalP.SharmaD. (2023). Determining the managerial perception on triple bottom line performance. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(2), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2021-0084
69.
MurtaghN.OdeleyeN. D.MaidmentC. (2019). Identities as enabling conditions of sustainability practices in urban planning: A critical realist exploration with planners in England. Urban Planning, 4(4), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i4.2263
70.
MwanduR. P. (2023). Corporate social responsibility investment by public sector organisations: A systematic literature review. African Journal of Accounting and Financial Research, 6(4), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.52589/AJAFR-FFEJXBPT
71.
NairS.MathewJ. (2023). Levelling up organisational learning through gamification: Based on evidence from public sector organisations in India. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 10(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/23220937221082772
72.
NijakiL. K. (2015). Justifying and juxtaposing environmental justice and sustainability: Towards an inter-generational and intra-generational analysis of environmental equity in public administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 85–116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24372044
73.
PalumboR.Fakhar ManeshM.PetroloD. (2024). What makes work smart in the public sector? Insights from a bibliometric analysis and interpretive literature review. Public Management Review, 26(6), 1449–1474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2152479
74.
PowerG.HansenO. L. (2010). The blueprint for global sustainability leadership. United Nations Global Compact Office.
75.
PullmanM. E.MaloniM. J.CarterC. R. (2009). Food for thought: Social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x
76.
RamosT. B.DominguesA. R.CaeiroS.CartaxoJ.PainhoM.AntunesP.SantosR.VideiraN.WalkerR. M.HuisinghD. (2021). Co-creating a sustainability performance assessment tool for public sector organisations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128738
77.
RayS. (2013). Linking public sector corporate social responsibility with sustainable development: Lessons from India. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 14, 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-69712013000600006
78.
RenS.FanD.TangG. (2023). Organizations’ management configurations towards environment and market performances. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05299-4
79.
RodriguesC. M.BastosL. G.CantarelliG. S.StedefeldtE.da CunhaD. T.de Freitas SaccolA. L. (2020). Sanitary, nutritional, and sustainable quality in food services of Brazilian early childhood education schools. Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 104920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104920
80.
RomanoG.MarcianoC.MinojaM. (2023). Successful remunicipalization processes in Italian waste management: Triggers, key success factors, and results. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(3), 648–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221077574
81.
RoziqinA.Kismartini FajrinaA. N.Salahudin., & SulistyaningsihT. (2022). The development of Indonesian e-Government: A bibliometric analysis. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 16(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.2007036
82.
SalatoR.GomesP.FerreiraC. (2024). Accrual accounting in the public sector of emerging economies: Bibliometric analysis and future research. Public Money & Management, 44(5),376–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2200968
83.
SangwanK. S.ChoudharyK. (2018). Benchmarking manufacturing industries based on green practices. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(6), 1746–1461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2200968
84.
SavitzA.WeberK. (2006). The triple bottom line. Jossey-Bass.
85.
SaxenaG.PurchaseD.MullaS. I.SarataleG. D.BharagavaR. N. (2020). Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated sites: Eco-environmental concerns, field studies, sustainability issues, and future prospects. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 249, 71–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2019_2
86.
SharabiM.PolinB.Yanay-VenturaG. (2019). The effect of social and economic transitions on the meaning of work: A cross-sectional study among Israeli employees. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 41(4), 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2018-0111
87.
SharmaS. K.SenguptaA.PanjaS. C. (2019). Mapping corruption risks in public procurement: Uncovering improvement opportunities and strengthening controls. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(4), 947–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1535984
88.
ShenJ.BensonJ. (2016). When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1723–1746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314522300
89.
TanL. K.EganM. (2018). The public accountability value of a triple bottom line approach to performance reporting in the water sector. Australian Accounting Review, 28(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12173
90.
TommasettiA.MussariR.MaioneG.SorrentinoD. (2020). Sustainability accounting and reporting in the public sector: Towards public value co-creation?Sustainability, 12(5), 1909. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051909
91.
TvaronavičienėM. (2014). If industrial sector development is sustainable: Lithuania compared to the EU. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 1, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2014.1.3(2)
92.
VedulaS.DoblingerC.PachecoD.YorkJ. G.BacqS.RussoM. V.DeanT. J. (2022). Entrepreneurship for the public good: A review, critique, and path forward for social and environmental entrepreneurship research. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 391–425. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0143
93.
WangK.JiangW. (2019). Brand equity and firm sustainable performance: The mediating role of analysts’ recommendations. Sustainability, 11(4), 1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041086
94.
WirtzB. W.KubinP. R.WeyererJ. C. (2023). Business model innovation in the public sector: An integrative framework. Public Management Review, 25(2), 340–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1972703
95.
YadavS. S. K.BandyopadhayayA. (2017). Communicating sustainability across the hierarchy of the organisation: A framework for the Indian ITeS sector. International Journal of Management Practice, 10(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2017.080647
96.
YajimaN. (2015). Protecting traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources by corporate social responsibility. In WolfR. (Ed.), Empowering organizations through corporate social responsibility (pp. 131–150). IGI Global.
97.
YarramS. R.Dung TranC. T. T.DolleryB. E. (2023). The impact of administrative intensity on financial sustainability in local government: An empirical analysis of New South Wales. Public Administration Quarterly, 47(4), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.47.4.3
98.
ZhanbayevR. A.YerkinA. Y.ShutalevaA. V.IrfanM.GabelashviliK.TemirbaevaG. R.ChazovaI. Y.AbdykadyrkyzyR. (2023). State asset management paradigm in the quasi-public sector and environmental sustainability: Insights from the Republic of Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1037023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1037023
99.
ZyoudS. H.Al-JabiS. W.SweilehW. M.WaringW. S. (2015). Scientific research related to calcium channel blockers poisoning: Bibliometric analysis in Scopus, 1968–2012. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 34(11), 1162–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327115571768
