Interactions with other organizations likely influence how local governments confront complex problems. Drawing on theories of collaborative governance, we investigate the extent to which collaboration affects U.S. local governments’ prioritization of the sustainability benefits of Smart Cities Technologies (SCT). Using data from the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) 2016 Smart Cities Survey and the U.S. Census Bureau, we find that collaboration with local, regional, and private sector partners influences the extent to which local governments prioritize the sustainability benefits of SCT. Organizational capacity is also an important predictor of perceived benefits of SCT. Our findings suggest a hidden side of boundary spanning, suggesting that collaboration can enhance opportunities for sustainability technologies.
AbelsM. (2014). Strategic alignment for the new normal: Collaboration, sustainability, and deliberation in local government across boundaries. State and Local Government Review, 46(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X14551179
2.
AbutabenjehS.DimandA. M.TaoJ. (2023). Determinants of the success of cooperative public procurement. Public Performance & Management Review, 46(2), 391–417.
3.
AbutabenjehS.NukpezahJ. A.AzharA. (2022). Do smart cities technologies contribute to local economic development?Economic Development Quarterly, 36(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242421105359
4.
AcutoM. (2013). City leadership in global governance. Global Governance, 19, 481–498.
5.
AgranoffR. (2017). Crossing boundaries for intergovernmental management. Georgetown University Press.
6.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
7.
Alfaro NavarroJ. L.López RuizV. R.Nevado PeñaD. (2017). The effect of ICT use and capability on knowledge-based cities. Cities, 60, 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.010
8.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A. (2010). Capacity, leadership, and organizational performance: Testing the black box model of public management. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02158.x
Angus-LeppanT.BennS.YoungL. (2010). A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.675
12.
AnsellC.GashA. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
13.
AppioF. P.LimaM.ParoutisS. (2019). Understanding smart cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.018
14.
AraralE. (2020). Why do cities adopt smart technologies? Contingency theory and evidence from the United States. Cities, 106, 102873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102873
15.
AtkinsonC. L.SapatA. K. (2013). Hurricane Wilma and long-term business recovery in disasters: The role of local government procurement and economic development. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 11(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2013-0002
16.
AwasthiR.NagarajanM.DeiningerK. W. (2021). Property taxation in India: Issues impacting revenue performance and suggestions for reform. Land Use Policy, 110, 104539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104539
17.
BakıcıT.AlmirallE.WarehamJ. (2013). A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
18.
BankinsS.DennessB.KrizA.MolloyC. (2017). Innovation agents in the public sector: Applying champion and promotor theory to explore innovation in the Australian public service: Innovation agents in the public sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12198
19.
BattyM. (2020). Defining smart cities: High and low frequency cities, big data and urban theory. In KitchinK.MarvinS.PerngA. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to smart cities (1st ed., pp. 10–24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178387
20.
BellS.MorseS. (2003). Measuring sustainability: Learning by doing. Earthscan Publications Ltd.
21.
BenavidesA. D.NukpezahJ. A. (2020). How local governments are caring for the homeless during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 650–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020942062
22.
BermanS. (2001). Ideas, norms, and culture in political analysis. Comparative Politics, 33(2), 231–250.
23.
BertelliA. M.SmithC. R. (2010). Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(Suppl1), i21–i40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup033
24.
BianchiC.NasiG.RivenbarkW. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: Models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777
25.
BjorvatnT.WaldA. (2018). Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 876–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.05.003
26.
BowmanA. O. M.KearneyR. C. (2016). State and local government. Cengage Learning.
BrinkE.WamslerC. (2018). Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation: Mapping citizen–municipality interactions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(2), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1795
29.
BrombergD.ManoharanA. (2015). E-procurement implementation in the United States: Understanding progress in local government. Public Administration Quarterly, 39, 360–392.
30.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM. (2003). Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00276
31.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2013). Complex contracting. Cambridge University Press.
32.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2006). Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00590.x
33.
BrunjesB. M. (2020). Competition and federal contractor performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz027
34.
BurkeR. (2013). Project management: Planning and control techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
CaragliuA.DelBo C. F. (2019). Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 373–383.
37.
CarrJ. B.HawkinsC. V. (2013). The costs of cooperation: What the research tells us about managing the risks of service collaborations in the US. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 224–239.
38.
ChristensenR. K.GazleyB. (2008). Capacity for public administration: Analysis of meaning and measurement. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 28(4), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.500
39.
ChristensenT.LægreidP. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration—theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4
40.
CleverS.CragoT.PolkaA.Al-JaroodiJ.MohamedN. (2018). Ethical analyses of smart city applications. Urban Science, 2(4), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2040096
41.
CutterS. L.BarnesL.BerryM.BurtonC.EvansE.TateE.WebbJ. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
42.
DameriR. P.CocchiaA. (2013, December). Smart city and digital city: Twenty years of terminology evolution [Conference session]. In X Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, ITAIS (pp. 1–8). Milan, Italy.
43.
DameriR. P.RicciardiF. (2015). Smart city intellectual capital: An emerging view of territorial systems innovation management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(4), 860–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2015-0018
44.
DaviterF. (2017). Coping, taming or solving: Alternative approaches to the governance of wicked problems. Policy Studies, 38(6), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1384543
45.
DeslatteA.StokanE. (2020). Sustainability synergies or silos? The opportunity costs of local government organizational capabilities. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13237
46.
DeslatteA.SwannW. L.FeiockR. C. (2021). Performance, satisfaction, or loss aversion? A Meso–Micro assessment of local commitments to sustainability programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa021
47.
DialloA. B.ReidM. F. (2021). Sustaining cross-sector collaborations: Managing conflicts in large-scale urban event collaborations. Public Administration Quarterly, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.45.4.5
48.
Dimitrijevska-MarkoskiT.NukpezahJ. A. (2022). Determinants of network effectiveness: Evidence from a benchmarking consortium. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(1), 61–75.
49.
DyerJ. H. (1997). Effective interim collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535–556.
50.
EmersonK.NabatchiT.BaloghS. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
51.
ErikssonE.AnderssonT.HellströmA.GadolinC.LifvergrenS. (2020). Collaborative public management: Coordinated value propositions among public service organizations. Public Management Review, 22(6), 791–812.
52.
EstoqueR. C.MurayamaY. (2014). Measuring sustainability based upon various perspectives: A case study of a hill station in southeast Asia. AMBIO, 43(7), 943–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0498-7
53.
FernandezS. (2004). Developing and testing an integrative framework of public sector leadership: Evidence from the public education arena. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui014
54.
FernandezS.RaineyH. G. (2017). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. In DurantR. F.DurantJ. R. S. (Eds.), Debating public administration: Management challenges, choices, and opportunities (pp. 7–26). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095097
FiorinoD. J.WetedC. A. (2020). Environmental federalism in a polarized era. State and Local Government Review, 52(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X20986225
57.
ForrerJ.KeeJ. E. (2004). Public servants as contract managers?Public Contract Law Journal, 33(2), 361–367.
58.
GabrysJ. (2014). Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and space, 32(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1068/d1681
GarganJ. J. (1981). Consideration of local government capacity. Public Administration Review, 41(6), 649. https://doi.org/10.2307/975741
61.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K. (2017). We know the Yin—But where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189
62.
GilleyA.GilleyJ. W.McMillanH. S. (2009). Organizational change: Motivation, communication, and leadership effectiveness. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(4), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20039
63.
HacklerD.SaxtonG. D. (2007). The strategic use of information technology by nonprofit organizations: Increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00730.x
64.
HansenK.MullinM.RiggsE. K. (2020). Collaboration risk and the choice to consolidate local government services. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(3), 223–238.
65.
HarmanH. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press.
66.
HartleyJ.SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
67.
HawkinsC. V.KrauseR. M.DeslatteA. (2021). Staff support and administrative capacity in strategic planning for local sustainability. Public Management Review, 25, 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1999667.
68.
HawkinsC. V.KwonS.-W.BaeJ. (2016). Balance between local economic development and environmental sustainability: A multilevel governance perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(11), 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1035787
69.
HeadB. W.AlfordJ. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
70.
HöjerM.WangelJ. (2015). Smart sustainable cities: Definition and challenges. In HiltyL. M.AebischerB. (Eds.), ICT innovations for sustainability (pp. 333–349). Springer International Publishing.
71.
HollandsR. G. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011
72.
HölscherK.FrantzeskakiN.McPhearsonT.LoorbachD. (2019). Tales of transforming cities: Transformative climate governance capacities in New York City, US and Rotterdam, Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043
73.
HomsyG. C.WarnerM. E. (2015). Cities and sustainability: Polycentric action and multilevel governance. Urban Affairs Review, 51(1), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414530545
74.
HomsyG. C.LiaoL.WarnerM. E. (2019). Sustainability and disaster planning: What are the connections?Rural Sociology, 84(3), 516–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12262
75.
HouY.MoynihanD. P.IngrahamP. W. (2003). Capacity, management, and performance: Exploring the links. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(3), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003251651
IngrahamP. W.JoyceP. G.DonahueA. K. (2003). Government performance: Why management matters. Taylor & Francis.
78.
Jenkins-SmithH. C.NohrstedtD.WeibleC. M.IngoldK. (2018). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. In WeibleC. M.SabatierP. A. (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 135–171). Routledge.
79.
JiH.DarnallN. (2018). All are not created equal: Assessing local governments’ strategic approaches towards sustainability. Public Management Review, 20(1), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1293147.
80.
JoaquinM. E.GreitensT. J. (2012). Contract management capacity breakdown? An analysis of U.S. local governments. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02587.x
81.
JoaquinM. E.GreitensT. J. (2021). American administrative capacity. Springer Books.
82.
JohnstonJ.KouzminA. (2010). Addressing governance, accountability and performance monitoring issues in partnerships: Can ‘infrastructure Australia’ provide a strategic response?Public Administration Quarterly, 34, 513–551.
83.
JukićT.PevcinP.BenčinaJ.DečmanM.VrbekS. (2019). Collaborative innovation in public administration: Theoretical background and research trends of co-production and co-creation. Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 90.
84.
KaroE.KattelR. (2018). Innovation and the state: Towards an evolutionary theory of policy capacity. In WuX.HowlettM.RameshM. (Eds.), Policy Capacity and Governance (pp. 123–150). Palgrave Macmillan.
85.
KeinerM.KimA. (2007). Transnational city networks for sustainability. European Planning Studies, 15(10), 1369–1395.
86.
KerznerH. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
87.
KimJ. (2018). Collaborative leadership and financial sustainability in local government. Local Government Studies, 44(6), 874–893.
88.
KimY.AldagA. M.WarnerM. E. (2020). A balanced view: Us local government managers’ perceptions of fiscal stress. Public Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 172–200. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.44.2.2
89.
KleinJ. T. (2020). Sustainability and collaboration: Cross disciplinary and cross-sector horizons. Sustainability, 12(4), 1515.
90.
KlijnE. H.KoppenjanJ. F. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management and International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(2), 135–158.
91.
KoernerA. A.JohnstonJ. M. (2021). Linking organizational capacity and performance: The case of probation and Medicaid reform in California counties. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 702–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab047
92.
KomninosN.PallotM.SchaffersH. (2013). Special issue on smart cities and the future internet in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0083-x
93.
KrauseR. M. (2011). Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), 45–60.
94.
KrauseR. M.FeiockR. C.HawkinsC. V. (2016). The administrative organization of sustainability within local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 113–127.
95.
KrauseR. M.HawkinsC. V.ParkA. Y. (2023). How has the COVID crisis impacted local governments’ sustainability efforts? An examination of initial effects. State and Local Government Review, 55(1), 27–40.
96.
KumarH.SinghM. K.GuptaM. P.MadaanJ. (2020). Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.024
97.
KushnerR. J.PooleP. P. (1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.4130070203
98.
KwonM.JangH. S.FeiockR. C. (2014). Climate protection and energy sustainability policy in California cities: What have we learned?Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(5), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12094
99.
LamP. T.YangW. (2020). Factors influencing the consideration of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) for smart city projects: Evidence from Hong Kong. Cities, 99, 102606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102606
100.
LarssonJ.LarssonL. (2020). Integration, application and importance of collaboration in sustainable project management. Sustainability, 12(2), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020585
101.
LaurianL.WalkerM.CrawfordJ. (2017). Implementing environmental sustainability in local government: The impacts of framing, agency culture, and structure in US cities and counties. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(3), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1107738
102.
LeeY. (2011). Economic development networks among local governments: The structure of collaboration networks in the Tampa Bay Metropolitan Area. International Review of Public Administration, 16(1), 113–134.
LeuenbergerD. Z.BartleJ. R. (2014). Sustainable development for public administration. Routledge.
105.
LiaoL.WarnerM. E.HomsyG. C. (2019). Sustainability’s forgotten third E: What influences local government actions on social equity?Local Environment, 24(12), 1197–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1683725
106.
LimW. M.RasulT. (2022). Customer engagement and social media: Revisiting the past to inform the future. Journal of Business Research, 148, 325–342.
107.
LimY.EdelenbosJ.GianoliA. (2019). Identifying the results of smart city development: Findings from systematic literature review. Cities, 95, 102397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102397
108.
LombardiP.GiordanoS.FarouhH.YousefW. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
109.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (Vol. 7). Stata Press.
110.
LongN. E. (1990). Conceptual notes on the public interest for public administration and policy analysts. Administration & Society, 22(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979002200202
111.
LubellM.LippertL. (2011). Integrated regional water management: A study of collaboration or water politics-as-usual in California, USA. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310388367
112.
MalatestaD.SmithC. R. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12181
113.
MartensM. L.CarvalhoM. M. (2017). Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers’ perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004
114.
McGuireM. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43.
115.
McGuireM.SilviaC. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: Evidence from local emergency management. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02134.x
116.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state: A governance perspective. JHU Press.
117.
MeijerA.BolívarM. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408.
MoldavanovaA. (2016). Two narratives of intergenerational sustainability: A framework for sustainable thinking. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(5), 526–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014565390
120.
NeirottiP.De MarcoA.CaglianoA. C.ManganoG.ScorranoF. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010
121.
NelsonK. L.SvaraJ. H. (2015). The roles of local government managers in theory and practice: A centennial perspective. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12296
122.
NowellB.IzodA. M.NgaruiyaK. M.BoydN. M. (2016). Public service motivation and sense of community responsibility: Comparing two motivational constructs in understanding leadership within community collaboratives. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv048
123.
NukpezahJ.AbutabenjehS.AzharA. (2022). Do smart cities technologies contribute to revenue performance? Evidence from US local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(5), 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2076248
124.
OkaforC. C.AigbavboaC.ThwalaW. D. (2022). A bibliometric evaluation and critical review of the smart city concept–making a case for social equity. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 4, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-06-2020-0098
125.
OppS. M.SaundersK. L. (2013). Pillar talk: Local sustainability initiatives and policies in the United States—Finding evidence of the “three E’s”: Economic development, environmental protection, and social equity. Urban Affairs Review, 49(5), 678–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412469344
126.
OppS. M.OsgoodJ. L.RugeleyC. R. (2014). Explaining the adoption and implementation of local environmental policies in the United States. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(5), 854–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12072
127.
OvermansJ. F. A.NoordegraafM. (2014). Managing austerity: Rhetorical and real responses to fiscal stress in local government. Public Money & Management, 34(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2014.887517
128.
PandeyS. K. (2017). Theory and method in public administration. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X1770703
129.
ParkA. Y. S.KrauseR. M.HawkinsC. V. (2021). Institutional mechanisms for local sustainability collaboration: Assessing the duality of formal and informal mechanisms in promoting collaborative processes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa036.
130.
PettiboneL. (2016). Governing urban sustainability: Comparing cities in the USA and Germany. Ashgate.
131.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
132.
PianezziD.MoriY.UddinS. (2021). Public–private partnership in a smart city: A curious case in Japan. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(3), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085232110518
133.
PierceJ. C.BuddW. W.LovrichN. P.Jr. (2011). Resilience and sustainability in US urban areas. Environmental Politics, 20(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.589580
134.
PihlajamaaM.MerisaloM. (2021). Organizing innovation contests for public procurement of innovation–a case study of smart city hackathons in Tampere, Finland. European Planning Studies, 29(10), 1906–1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1894097
135.
PrzeybiloviczE.CunhaM. A.GeertmanS.LeleuxC.MichelsA.TomorZ.WilliamC.WebsterR.MeijerA. (2022). Citizen participation in the smart city: Findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 23–47.
SahaD. (2009). Factors influencing local government sustainability efforts. State and Local Government Review, 41(1), 39–48.
140.
SahaD.PatersonR. G. (2008). Local government efforts to promote the “Three Es” of sustainable development: Survey in medium to large cities in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08321803
141.
SajhauP. (2017). IBM–building sustainable cities through partnerships and integrated approaches. Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions, (Special Issue 16), 52–57.
142.
SandfortJ. (1999). The structural impediments to human service collaboration: Examining welfare reform at the front lines. Social Service Review, 73(3), 314–339.
143.
SchickA. (1988). Micro-budgetary adaptations to fiscal stress in industrialized democracies. Public Administration Review, 48(1), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/975515
144.
SchipperR. P. J.SilviusA. J. (2018). Characteristics of smart sustainable city development: Implications for project management. Smart Cities, 1(1), 75–97.
145.
SchwartzE. (2019). Autonomous local climate change policy: An analysis of the effect of intergovernmental relations among subnational governments. Review of Policy Research, 36(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12320
146.
ScottT. A.ThomasC. W. (2017). Unpacking the collaborative toolbox: Why and when do public managers choose collaborative governance strategies?Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12162
147.
SelinH.VanDeveerS. D. (2011). US climate change politics and policymaking. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(1), 121–127.
148.
SharifiA. (2020). A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101936.
SniderK. F.RendonR. G. (2012). Public procurement: Public administration and public service perspectives. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(2), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2012.12001687
151.
SnisU. L.OlssonA. K.BernhardI. (2021). Becoming a smart old town – How to manage stakeholder collaboration and cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-10-2020-0148
152.
SørensenE.TorfingJ. (2021). Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance?Public Management Review, 23(11), 1590–1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1879914
153.
SoujaaI.NukpezahJ. A.BenavidesA. D. (2021). Coordination effectiveness during public health emergencies: An institutional collective action framework. Administration & Society, 53(7), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720985440
154.
StritchJ. M.BretschneiderS.DarnallN.HsuehL.ChenY. (2020). Sustainability policy objectives, centralized decision making, and efficiency in public procurement processes in U.S. local governments. Sustainability, 12(17), 6934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176934
155.
SvaraJ. H.WattT. C.JangH. S. (2013). How are US cities doing sustainability? Who is getting on the sustainability train, and why?Cityscape, 15(1), 9–44.
156.
SvaraJ. H.WattT. C.TakaiK. (2015). Advancing social equity as an integral dimension of sustainability in local communities. Cityscape, 17(2), 139–166.
157.
SwannW. L.DeslatteA. (2019). What do we know about urban sustainability? A research synthesis and nonparametric assessment. Urban Studies, 56(9), 1729–1747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018779713
158.
TermanJ.SmithC. (2018). Putting your money where your mouth is: Green procurement as a form of sustainability. Journal of Public Procurement, 18(3), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-2018-013
159.
ThaiK. V.GrimmR. (2000). Government procurement: Past and current developments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 12(2), 231–247.
TingM. M. (2011). Organizational capacity. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 27(2), 245–271.
162.
TrammellE.AbutabenjehS.DimandA. M. (2020). A review of public administration research: Where does public procurement fit in? International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1644654
163.
TrindadeE. P.HinnigM. P. F.MoreiradaCostaE.MarquesJ. S.BastosR. C.YigitcanlarT. (2017). Sustainable development of smart cities: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(3), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0063-2
164.
TurnerR. (2016). Gower handbook of project management. Routledge.
Van SlykeD. M. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00291
167.
Van SlykeD. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul012
168.
Viale PereiraG.CunhaM. A.LampoltshammerT. J.ParycekP.TestaM. G. (2017). Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: A cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Information Technology for Development, 23(3), 526–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
169.
VinzantD. H.VinzantJ. C. (1996). Strategy and organizational capacity: Finding a fit. Public Productivity & Management Review, 20(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380482
170.
VoelzG. J. (2010). Contractors in the government workplace: Managing the blended workforce. Government Institutes.
171.
WalkerW. E.ChaikenJ. M. (1982). The effects of fiscal contraction on innovation in the public sector. Policy Sciences, 15(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143076
172.
WangQ.PengJ. (2018). Political embeddedness of public pension governance: An event history analysis of discount rate changes. Public Administration Review, 78(5), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12968
173.
WangX.HawkinsC. V.LebredoN.BermanE. M. (2012). Capacity to sustain sustainability: A study of U.S. cities. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02566.
174.
WarbroekB.HoppeT.BressersH.CoenenF. (2019). Testing the social, organizational, and governance factors for success in local low carbon energy initiatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101269
175.
WarnerM. E.AldagA. M.KimY. (2021). Privatization and intermunicipal cooperation in US local government services: Balancing fiscal stress, need and political interests. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1751255
176.
WeberE. P.KhademianA. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
177.
WhitfordA. B.WongK. (2009). Political and social foundations for environmental sustainability. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908318322
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, p. 383.
181.
YiH.SuoL.ShenR.ZhangJ.RamaswamiA.FeiockR. C. (2018). Regional governance and institutional collective action for environmental sustainability. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 556–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12799
182.
YigitcanlarT. (2015). Smart cities: An effective urban development and management model?Australian Planner, 52(1), 27–34.
183.
YigitcanlarT.KamruzzamanMd.BuysL.IoppoloG.Sabatini-MarquesJ.da CostaE. M.YunJ. J. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003
