Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-6
Where Do Participants Move and How Do Their New Neighborhoods Compare to Where They Rented? Evidence from a North Carolina First-Time Homeownership Program
In North Carolina, the Forsyth County Homeownership Program (FCHP) seeks to promote improved socioeconomic outcomes and wealth accumulation through home ownership by subsidizing down payments and offering a targeted financial literacy program. An important aspect of the FCHP is that it allows participants to decide what house to buy and where they ultimately live. We offer a first-ever analysis of the neighborhood differences between where participating families rented and where they moved. Analyzing a sample of 452 participants, we find evidence that the average family moved to neighborhoods with improved socioeconomic characteristics, compared to the neighborhoods where they rented. However, their new neighborhoods had worse socioeconomic measurements when compared to the overall county. We offer a discussion of these results and their policy implications.
BellA.ChettyR.JaravelX.PetkovaN.Van ReenenJ. (2019). Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 647–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy028
2.
Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG. J.KlebanovP. K.SealandN. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development?American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395. https://doi.org/10.1086/230268
3.
ChettyR.HendrenN.JonesM. R.PorterS. R. (2020). Race and economic opportunity in the United States: An intergenerational perspective. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 711–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz042
4.
ChettyR.HendrenN.KatzL. F. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855–902. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150572
5.
ChettyR.HendrenN.KlineP.SaezE. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553–1623. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju022
6.
DarrahJ.DeLucaS. (2014). Living here has changed my whole perspective”: How escaping inner-city poverty shapes neighborhood and housing choice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), 350–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21758
7.
DiPasqualeD.GlaeserE. L. (1999). Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens?Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 354–384. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1998.2098
8.
FreemanA.HardenJ. J. (2015). Affordable homeownership: The incidence and effect of down payment assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 25(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2014.915226
9.
GreenR. K.WhiteM. J. (1997). Measuring the benefits of homeowning: Effects on children. Journal of Urban Economics, 41(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2010
10.
Grinstein-WeissM.KeyC.GuoS.YeoY. H.HolubK. (2013). Homeownership and wealth among low- and moderate-income households. Housing Policy Debate, 23(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2013.771786
11.
GroggerJ. (1997). Local violence and educational attainment. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 659–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/146425
12.
HerbertC. E.TsenW. (2007). The potential of downpayment assistance for increasing homeownership among minority and low-income households. Cityscape, 9, 153–183.
13.
HessC.WalterR. J.AcolinA.ChasinsS. (2019). Comparing small area fair market rents with other rental measures across diverse housing markets. Cityscape, 21(3), 159–186.
14.
JencksC.MayerS. E.Jr. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In LynnL. E.McGearyM. G. H. (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). National Academy Press.
LoganJ. R.ZhangW.StultsB. J.GardnerT. (2021). Improving estimates of neighborhood change with constant tract boundaries. Applied Geography, 132: 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102476
17.
MendenhallR.DeLucaS.DuncanG. (2006). Neighborhood resources, racial segregation, and economic mobility: Results from the Gautreaux program. Social Science Research, 35(4), 892–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.06.007
18.
PerkinsK. L.RiegerS. M.SpaderJ.HerbertC. (2020). The potential for shared equity and other forms of down payment assistance to expand access to homeownership. Cityscape, 22(1), 147–186.
19.
QuerciaR. G.McCarthyG. W.WachterS. M. (2003). The impacts of affordable lending efforts on homeownership rates. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1051-1377(03)00004-4
20.
ReidC. K. (2006). Locating the American dream: Assessing the neighborhood benefits of homeownership. In RoheW. M.WatsonH. (Eds.), Chasing the American dream: Multidisciplinary perspectives on affordable homeownership (pp. 233–261). Cornell University Press.
RosenbaumJ. E.DeLucaS. (2000). Is housing mobility the key to welfare reform. Lessons from Chicago’s Gautreaux Project. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/rosenbaum.pdf.
23.
RothwellJ.MasseyD. S. (2015). Geographic effects on intergenerational income mobility. Economic Geography, 91(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12072
24.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
25.
SantiagoA. M.GalsterG. C.KaiserA. A.RomanA. H. S. S.GraceR. A.LinnA. T. W. (2010). Low-Income homeownership: Does it necessarily mean sacrificing neighborhood quality to buy a home?Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00478.x
SharkeyP.FaberJ. W. (2014). Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043350
28.
SharkeyP.Torrats-EspinosaG. (2017). The effect of violent crime on economic mobility. Journal of Urban Economics, 102, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.07.001
29.
TachL.JacobyS.WiebeD. J.GuerraT.RichmondT. S. (2016). The effect of microneighborhood conditions on adult educational attainment in a subsidized housing intervention. Housing Policy Debate, 26(2), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2015.1107118
VanfossenB.BrownC. H.KellamS.SokoloffN.DoeringS. (2010). Neighborhood context and the development of aggression in boys and girls. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20367
WainerA.ZabelJ. (2020). Homeownership and wealth accumulation for low-income households. Journal of Housing Economics, 47, 101624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2019.03.002
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
