Where Do Participants Move and How Do Their New Neighborhoods Compare to Where They Rented? Evidence from a North Carolina First-Time Homeownership Program

Abstract

In North Carolina, the Forsyth County Homeownership Program (FCHP) seeks to promote improved socioeconomic outcomes and wealth accumulation through home ownership by subsidizing down payments and offering a targeted financial literacy program. An important aspect of the FCHP is that it allows participants to decide what house to buy and where they ultimately live. We offer a first-ever analysis of the neighborhood differences between where participating families rented and where they moved. Analyzing a sample of 452 participants, we find evidence that the average family moved to neighborhoods with improved socioeconomic characteristics, compared to the neighborhoods where they rented. However, their new neighborhoods had worse socioeconomic measurements when compared to the overall county. We offer a discussion of these results and their policy implications.

Keywords

neighborhood first-time homeownership program homeownership moving

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell

Chetty

Jaravel

Petkova

Van Reenen

(2019). Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 647–713. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy028

Brooks-Gunn

Duncan

G. J.

Klebanov

P. K.

Sealand

(1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395. https://doi.org/10.1086/230268

Chetty

Hendren

Jones

M. R.

Porter

S. R.

(2020). Race and economic opportunity in the United States: An intergenerational perspective. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 711–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz042

Chetty

Hendren

Katz

L. F.

(2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855–902. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150572

Chetty

Hendren

Kline

Saez

(2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553–1623. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju022

Darrah

DeLuca

(2014). Living here has changed my whole perspective”: How escaping inner-city poverty shapes neighborhood and housing choice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), 350–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21758

DiPasquale

Glaeser

E. L.

(1999). Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens? Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), 354–384. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1998.2098

Freeman

Harden

J. J.

(2015). Affordable homeownership: The incidence and effect of down payment assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 25(2), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2014.915226

Green

R. K.

White

M. J.

(1997). Measuring the benefits of homeowning: Effects on children. Journal of Urban Economics, 41(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2010

10.

Grinstein-Weiss

Key

Guo

Yeo

Y. H.

Holub

(2013). Homeownership and wealth among low- and moderate-income households. Housing Policy Debate, 23(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2013.771786

11.

Grogger

(1997). Local violence and educational attainment. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 659–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/146425

12.

Herbert

C. E.

Tsen

(2007). The potential of downpayment assistance for increasing homeownership among minority and low-income households. Cityscape, 9, 153–183.

13.

Hess

Walter

R. J.

Acolin

Chasins

(2019). Comparing small area fair market rents with other rental measures across diverse housing markets. Cityscape, 21(3), 159–186.

14.

Jencks

Mayer

S. E.

Jr. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In Lynn

L. E.

McGeary

M. G. H.

(Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111–186). National Academy Press.

15.

Kleit

R. G.

Manzo

L. C.

Stanko

Pollard

(n.d). HOPE VI redevelopment of Westpark evaluation: Year III report (Research Report University of Washington). Retrieved from https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/u.osu.edu/dist/6/1264/files/2014/08/2-1z6tgyi.pdf.

16.

Logan

J. R.

Zhang

Stults

B. J.

Gardner

(2021). Improving estimates of neighborhood change with constant tract boundaries. Applied Geography, 132: 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102476

17.

Mendenhall

DeLuca

Duncan

(2006). Neighborhood resources, racial segregation, and economic mobility: Results from the Gautreaux program. Social Science Research, 35(4), 892–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.06.007

18.

Perkins

K. L.

Rieger

S. M.

Spader

Herbert

(2020). The potential for shared equity and other forms of down payment assistance to expand access to homeownership. Cityscape, 22(1), 147–186.

19.

Quercia

R. G.

McCarthy

G. W.

Wachter

S. M.

(2003). The impacts of affordable lending efforts on homeownership rates. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1051-1377(03)00004-4

20.

Reid

C. K.

(2006). Locating the American dream: Assessing the neighborhood benefits of homeownership. In Rohe

W. M.

Watson

(Eds.), Chasing the American dream: Multidisciplinary perspectives on affordable homeownership (pp. 233–261). Cornell University Press.

21.

Rohe

W. M.

Stewart

L. S.

(1996). Homeownership and neighborhood stability. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 37–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1996.9521213

22.

Rosenbaum

J. E.

DeLuca

(2000). Is housing mobility the key to welfare reform. Lessons from Chicago’s Gautreaux Project. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/rosenbaum.pdf.

23.

Rothwell

Massey

D. S.

(2015). Geographic effects on intergenerational income mobility. Economic Geography, 91(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12072

24.

Sampson

R. J.

Morenoff

J. D.

Gannon-Rowley

(2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114

25.

Santiago

A. M.

Galster

G. C.

Kaiser

A. A.

Roman

A. H. S. S.

Grace

R. A.

Linn

A. T. W.

(2010). Low-Income homeownership: Does it necessarily mean sacrificing neighborhood quality to buy a home? Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00478.x

26.

Santiago

A. M.

Leroux

(2021). Hogar Dulce Hogar? [Home Sweet Home?]. Cityscape, 23(3), 95–136.

27.

Sharkey

Faber

J. W.

(2014). Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043350

28.

Sharkey

Torrats-Espinosa

(2017). The effect of violent crime on economic mobility. Journal of Urban Economics, 102, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.07.001

29.

Tach

Jacoby

Wiebe

D. J.

Guerra

Richmond

T. S.

(2016). The effect of microneighborhood conditions on adult educational attainment in a subsidized housing intervention. Housing Policy Debate, 26(2), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2015.1107118

30.

Tamborini

C. R.

Kim

Sakamoto

(2015). Education and lifetime earnings in the United States. Demography, 52(4), 1383–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0407-0

31.

Vanfossen

Brown

C. H.

Kellam

Sokoloff

Doering

(2010). Neighborhood context and the development of aggression in boys and girls. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20367

32.

Van Zandt

Rohe

W. M.

(2006). Do first-time home buyers improve their neighborhood quality? Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(5), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00311.x

33.

Wainer

Zabel

(2020). Homeownership and wealth accumulation for low-income households. Journal of Housing Economics, 47, 101624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2019.03.002

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB