A decade before the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States (US) federal government was working to create flexible work environments for employees under the 2010 Telework Enhancement Act. Given this reality and the growing desire for greater flexibility of workers inspired by the “Great Resignation” during the pandemic, the US federal government appears to have recovered lost employees faster than other levels of the public sector. Still, given that federal workers skew older with less than a tenth of the workforce being under age 30 years and nearly a third reaching retirement age, a true crisis still looms in our administrative state. Using the 2021 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey Data, we analyze what factors predict turnover intention post-pandemic, focusing the analysis on teleworking and other workplace flexibility policies. We use the findings to make recommendations to help increase employee recruitment and retention within the US federal government.
BaeK.KimD. (2016). The impact of decoupling of telework on job satisfaction in US federal agencies: Does gender matter?The American Review of Public Administration, 46, 356–371.
3.
BaileyD.KurlandN. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383–400.
4.
BertelliA. M. (2007). Determinants of bureaucratic turnover intention: Evidence from the department of the treasury. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul003
5.
BodeC.SinghJ.RoganM. (2015). Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organization Science, 26(6), 1702–1720.
6.
CaillierJ. (2018). Do flexible work schedules reduce turnover in U.S. federal agencies?The Social Science Journal, 55, 108–115
7.
CaillierJ. G. (2012). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. Federal Government Agency. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011409394
8.
ChoiS. (2020). Flexible work arrangements and employee retention: A longitudinal analysis of the federal workforces. Public Personnel Management, 49(3), 470–495.
9.
DahlstromT. R. (2013). Telecommuting and leadership style. Public Personnel Management, 42(3), 438–451.
10.
DaltonD. R.JohnsonJ. L.DailyC. M. (1999). On the use of “intent to.” variables in organizational research: An empirical and cautionary assessment. Human Relations, 52(10), 1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905201006
11.
De VriesH.TummersL.BekkersV. (2018). The benefits of teleworking in the public sector: Reality or rhetoric?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39, 570–593.
ErtasN. (2015). Turnover intentions and work motivations of millennial employees in federal service. Public Personnel Management, 44(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026015588193
14.
FacerR. L.WadsworthL. (2008). Alternative work schedules and work-family balance: A research note. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 166–177.
15.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis
16.
Government Accountability Office. (2020). Disability employment (Report to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, U.S. House of Representatives. GAO-20-384).
17.
GreenD. D.RobertsG. E. (2010). Personnel implications of public sector virtual organizations. Public Personnel Management, 39(1), 47–57.
18.
GuimaraesT.DallowP. (1999). Empirically testing the benefits, problems, and success factors for telecommuting programmes. European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 40–54.
19.
HassettM. P. (2022). The effect of access to training and development opportunities, on rates of work engagement, within the US Federal Workforce. Public Personnel Management, 51(3), 380–404.
20.
HatcherW. (2020). Voicing the problem of administrative burnout and the solution of caring organizations. Public Voices, 16(2), 79–93.
HombergM.LükemannL.AbendrothA. K. (2023). From ‘home work’ to ‘home office work’?Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 17(1), 74–116.
23.
HuntonJ. E.NormanC. S. (2010). The impact of alternative telework arrangements on organizational commitment: Insights from a longitudinal field experiment. Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 67–90.
24.
JurkiewiczC. L.BrownR. G. (1998). Generational comparisons of public employee motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18(4), 18–37.
25.
KangI. G.CroftB.BichelmeyerB. A. (2021). Predictors of turnover intention in U.S. Federal Government Workforce: Machine learning evidence that perceived comprehensive HR practices predict turnover intention. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020977562
26.
KimS. (2005). Factors affecting state government information technology employee turnover intentions. American Review of Public Administration, 35(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004273150
27.
KimS. Y.FernandezS. (2017). Employee empowerment and turnover intention in the US federal bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 4–22.
28.
KwonM.JeonS. H. (2020). Do leadership commitment and performance-oriented culture matter for federal teleworker satisfaction with telework programs?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 36–55.
29.
LeeD.KimS. (2016). A quasi-experimental examination of telework eligibility and participation in the U.S. federal government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38, 451–471.
30.
LeeH.-W.RobertsonP. J.KimK. (2020). Determinants of job satisfaction among U.S. Federal Employees: An investigation of racial and gender differences. Public Personnel Management, 49(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019869371
31.
LeiderJ. P.HarperE.ShonJ. W.SellersK.CastrucciB. C. (2016). Job satisfaction and expected turnover among federal, state, and local public health practitioners. American Journal of Public Health, 106(10), 1782–1788. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2016.303305
32.
LewisG. B. (1991). Turnover and the quiet crisis in the federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 51(2), 145–155.
33.
Liss-LevinsonR.BharthapudiK.LeiderJ. P.SellersK. (2015). Loving and leaving public health: Predictors of intentions to quit among state health agency workers. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 21, S91–S101. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000317
34.
MahlerJ. (2012). The telework divide: Managerial and personnel challenges of telework. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 407–418.
35.
McCarthyI. O.MoonesingheR.DeanH. D. (2020). Association of employee engagement factors and turnover intention among the 2015 U.S. Federal Government Workforce. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931847
36.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). The ties that bind: Social networks, person-organization value fit, and turnover intention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum013
Pink-HarperS. A.RauhausB. (2017). Examining the impact of federal employee wellness programs and employee resilience in the federal workplace. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 40(3), 353–387.
40.
PittsD.MarvelJ.FernandezS. (2011). So hard to say goodbye? Turnover intention among U.S. Federal Employees. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02414.x
41.
PourshabanD.Basurto-DávilaR.ShihM. (2015). Building and sustaining strong public health agencies. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 21, S80–S90. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000311
42.
ReshW.MoldogazievT.FernandezS.LeslieC. A. (2021). Reversing the lens: Assessing the use of federal employee viewpoint survey in public administration research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 132–162.
43.
RousseauD. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations. Sage.
44.
RubinE. V. (1973). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the department of defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum035
45.
SellersK.LeiderJ. P.LamprechtL.Liss-LevinsonR.CastrucciB. C. (2020). Using public health workforce surveillance data to prioritize retention efforts for younger staff. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(4), 562–569.
46.
SetiawanI.SuprihantoS.NugrahaA. C.HutahaeanJ. (2020). HR analytics: Employee attrition analysis using logistic regression. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(3), 032001.
47.
Sousa-UvaM.Sousa-UvaA.SerranheiraF. (2021). Telework during the COVID-19 epidemic in Portugal and determinants of job satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–11.
48.
TaskinL.EdwardsP. (2007). The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: Lessons from the public sector. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22, 195–207.
49.
TaylorD.KavanaughJ. (2005). Developing a model of leadership in the teleworking environment: A qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 9, 73–95.
50.
TremblayD. G. (2002). Balancing work and family with telework? Organizational issues and challenges for women and mangers. Women in Management Review, 17(3/4), 157–170.
51.
TremblayD. G. (2012). Work-family balance: Is the social economy sector more supportive. . . and is this because of its more democratic management?Review of Social Economy, 70(2), 200–232.
WangT. K.BrowerR. (2019). Job satisfaction among federal employees: The role of employee interaction with work environment. Public Personnel Management, 48(1), 3–26.
54.
WeaverT. L. (2015). Intent to exit: Why do US federal employees leave?International Journal of Public Administration, 38(6), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.949739
WrightT.CropanzanoR. (1998). Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 486–493.
