This study explores how practitioners navigate feelings of nervousness associated with racial and economic inequities connected to public transit systems. It utilizes Gooden's (2014) 10 principles for conquering nervousness, which have received little attention in the literature to date. This preliminary investigation thus examines the extent to which the principles are adopted – or not – by transit practitioners across four diverse metropolitan areas. A purposive sample of transit equity experts led to 12 in-depth interviews. The analysis illustrates varying degrees of principle adoption amongst the participants. Findings suggest that external legal triggers (such as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) most often move the needle on racial equity in public transit. The least adopted principles indicate that agencies are less likely to adopt a race-conscious approach, limiting acknowledgement of historical inequities and structural barriers, which allows nervousness to linger and inequities to persist on a societal level.
AlbalateD., & BelG. (2009). What local policy makers should know about urban road charging: Lessons from worldwide experience. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 962–974.
5.
AlkadryM. G., & BlessettB. (2010). Aloofness or dirty hands? Administrative culpability in the making of the second ghetto. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(4), 532–556.
6.
AlkadryM. G., BlessettB., & PattersonV. L. (2017). Public administration, diversity, and the ethic of getting things done. Administration & Society, 49(8), 1191–1218.
7.
BassB. M., & AvolioB. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 112–121.
BrewerG. A. (2005). In the eye of the storm: Frontline supervisors and federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 505–527.
10.
BrewerG. A., & SeldenS. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 685–712.
11.
BlairR. F., & StarkeA. M.Jr (2017). The emergence of local government policy leadership: A roaring torch or a flickering flame?State and Local Government Review, 49(4), 275–284.
12.
CaillierJ. G. (2011). Funding, management, and individual-level factors: What factors matter in predicting perceived organizational effectiveness?International Journal of Public Administration, 34(7), 413–423.
13.
CappellanoF., & SpistoA. (2014). Transit oriented development & social equity: From mixed use to mixed framework. Advanced Engineering Forum, 11, 314–322.
14.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. (2nd edition). London: Sage Publications.
15.
DawkinsC., & MoeckelR. (2016). Transit-induced gentrification: Who will stay, and who will go?Housing Policy Debate, 26(4–5), 801–818.
16.
EmisonG. A. (2006). The EPA bureaucrat who could. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 152.
GarrettM., & TaylorB. (1999). Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Berkeley Planning Journal, 13(1), 6–27.
22.
GoodenS. T.2014. Race and social equity: A nervous area of government. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
23.
GoodenS. T. (2015a). PAR's social equity footprint. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 372–381.
24.
GoodenS. (2015b). From equality to equity. In GuyM. & RubinM. (Eds.), Public administration evolving: From foundations to the future (pp. 210–231). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
GoodenS. T. (2017). Social equity and evidence: Insights from local government. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 822–828.
26.
GoodenS. T., & RisslerG. E. (2017). Local government: Social equity “First Responders”. State and Local Government Review, 49(1), 37–47.
27.
GuestG., BunceA., & JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
28.
HallJ. L. (2007). Informing state economic development policy in the new economy: A theoretical foundation and empirical examination of state innovation in the United States. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 630–645.
29.
HibbertsM., JohnsonB.R., & HudsonK. (2012). Common survey sampling techniques. In GideonL. (Ed.), Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp. 53–74). New York, NY: Springer.
30.
HsiehH. F., & ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
31.
HurY., & StricklandR. A. (2015). Diversity management practices, do they make a difference? Examining consequences of their adoption in local governments. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(2), 325–357.
32.
JohnsonN., & SvaraJ. (2011). Justice for all: Promoting social equity in public administration. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
33.
KahnM. E. (2007). Gentrification trends in new transit-oriented communities: Evidence from 14 cities that expanded and built rail transit systems. Real Estate Economics, 35(2), 155–182.
34.
KellyM. (1994). Theories of justice and street-level discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(2), 119–140.
35.
KimS. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245–261.
36.
KingG., KeohaneR. O., & VerbaS. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
LarsonS. J. (2018). Examining the efficacy of Title VI social equity analysis: A comparative case study of transit access and neighborhood segregation outcomes over time. Public Integrity, 20(4), 344–357.
38.
LavenaC. F. (2016). Whistle-blowing: individual and organizational determinants of the decision to report wrongdoing in the federal government. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 113–136.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
Lopez-LittletonV., BlessettB., & BurrJ. (2018). Advancing social justice and racial equity in the public sector. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(4), 449–468.
42.
MahlerJ. (1997). Influences of organizational culture on learning in public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 519–540.
43.
MathurS., & SrinivasanS. (2009). High-speed rail in the Midwest United States: potential for success. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 4(4), 59–74.
44.
MelkersJ., & WilloughbyK. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
47.
MoynihanD. P. (2005). Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 203–216.
48.
MoynihanD. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
49.
NaffK. C., & KelloughJ. E. (2003). Ensuring employment equity: Are federal diversity programs making a difference?International Journal of Public Administration, 26(12), 1307–1336.
50.
PittsD. W. (2011). A little less conversation, a little more action: Using empirical research to promote social equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), i77–i82.
51.
PoisterT. H. (2005). Performance measurement in transportation: State of the practice. In the Transportation Research Board Performance Measures to Improve Transportation Systems Second National Conference. Irvine, CA, August 22–24, 2004.
52.
PoisterT. H., & StreibG. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59(4), 325–335.
53.
PoisterT. H., PashaO. Q., & EdwardsL. H. (2013). Does performance management lead to better outcomes? Evidence from the US public transit industry. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 625–636.
RiveraJ. D. (2018). When attaining the best sample is out of reach: Nonprobability alternatives when engaging in public administration research. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 1–29.
57.
RutledgeP. (2002). Some unfinished business in public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 390–394.
SingletonR. A. & StraitsB. C. (2010). Approaches to social research (Fifth edition). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
StarkeA. M., HecklerN., & MackeyJ. (2018). Administrative racism: Public administration education and race. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2018.1426428.
61.
WellmanG. C. (2012). Community empowerment and public transportation agencies: A case study analysis of transit agencies' community development initiatives. Community Development, 43(4), 512–526.
62.
WellmanG. C. (2015). The social justice (of) movement: How public transportation administrators define social justice. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 117–146.
63.
WittM. T. (2018). Never post-racial: The persistence of the dual state. Public Integrity, 20(4), 1–15.
