The extant literature has demonstrated the vast gender differences among public officials, especially as it relates to agenda priorities and implementation as well as leadership and management styles. However, questions remain as to budget-related organizational performance and gender differences. Previous studies have examined elected official and high level management differences with little research dedicated to staff personnel with major responsibilities. In this exploratory study, there is an examination of North Carolina county financial management influence based on quantitative performance indicators. Findings indicate female finance officers maintain a stronger gatekeeping role compared to male counterparts denying initial departmental request more frequently while maintaining suitable salaries; however, males have an increased probability of more budget discretion, staff, and increased investment income.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexisMarcus and WilsonCharles Z. (1967). Organizational Decision-Making. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
2.
BurnsRuth Ann (1979). Women in Muncipal Management: Choice, Challenge & Change. Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, New Jersey: Center of the American Woman and Politics.
3.
CoeCharles K. (2008). Preventing Local Government Fiscal Crises: Emerging Practices. Public Administration Review68 (4): 759–767.
4.
CoeC.HarlesK. (2007). Preventing Local Government Fiscal Crises: The North Carolina Approach. Public Budgeting and Finance27 (1): 39–49.
5.
ConwayMargaret M.; SteuernagelGertrude A.; and AhemDavid W. (1997). Women and Political Participation. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.
6.
CroswellRobert. (1975). Self-Governing Growth in Public Programs. Public Choice21: 91–99.
7.
DolanJulie. (2002). Representative Bureaucracy in the Federal Executive: Gender and Spending Priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory12 (3): 353–375.
8.
DownsAnthony. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown Publishers.
9.
FoxRichard L. and SchuhmannRobert A. (1999). Gender and Local Government: A Comparison of Women and Men City Managers. Public Administration Review59 (3): 231–243.
10.
FrankovicKathleen A. (1982). “Sex and Politics-New Alignments, Old Issues.” PS15(3):439–48.
11.
GawthropLouis C. (1969). Bureaucratic Behavior in the Executive Branch. New York: Free Press.
Groves SanfordM. and MaureenG. (2003). Evaluating Financial Conditions: A Handbook for Local Government. Washington, D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
MeierKenneth J., and NigroLloyd G. (1976). “Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences: A Study in the Attitudes of Federal Executives.” Public Administration Review36 (4):458–69.
17.
ModlinSteve. (2010). “State Enhancement of Local Government Decision Making in the Budgetary Process: A Model for State Oversight of Local Government Finances.” Public Performance & Management Review33 (4): 571–593.
18.
ModlinSteve. (2011). “Who Really Runs County Government? The County Manager in the Budget Formulation Process.” Public Administration & Management16 (12): 21–45.
19.
ModlinSteve. (2012b). “County Government Finance Practices: What Independent Auditors are Finding and What Makes Local Government Susceptible.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management24 (4): 558–578.
20.
ModlinSteve. (2008). “Defining the Role of County Commissioners in the Budgetary Process.” Politics & Policy36 (6): 1044–1065.
21.
ModlinSteve. (2016a). “County Government Fleet Purchasing Practices: Financial Efficiency v. Need Assertion.” Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs2 (1): 15–30.
22.
ModlinSteve. (2016b). “Getting All You Can: County Government Investment Pool Participation Based On Need or Want.” Public Administration Quarterly40 (4): 949–970.
23.
ModlinSteve. (2016c). “Increasing Transparency and Efficiency: An Examination of County Government Note Disclosures.” Public Administration Research5 (2): 59–69.
24.
ModlinSteve. (2017). “Increasing Transparency through Compliance: Revisiting Local Government Audit Findings.” Public Finance and Management17 (4).
25.
ModlinSteve and StewartLaShonda. (2012a). “Cash Management Practices Among Southeastern County Governments: Proper Utilization or Excessive Caution.” Public Finance and Management12 (2): 100–119.
26.
ModlinSteve and StewartLaShonda. (2013). “Assessing Participation In The State-Sponsored Local Government Investment Pool During The Recession: An Examination Of North Carolina Counties.” Public Budgeting & Finance33 (4): 90–106.
27.
ModlinSteve and StewartLaShonda. (2014). “Determining County Government Fiscal Instability: Independent Audit Report Findings and the Prompting of State Action.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management26 (3): 405–428.
28.
MorganD., RobinsonK. and StrachotaD. (2015). Budgeting for Local Governments and Communities. Oxford, U.K.: Taylor & Francis Press.
29.
NiskanenWilliam A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
30.
RomzekBarbara S. (1990). “Employee Investment and Commitment: The Ties That Bind.” Public Administration Review50 (3): 374–82.
31.
ShapiroRobert Y, and MahajanHarpreet. (1986). “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly50 (1):42–61.
32.
SimonHerbert A. (1957). Administrative Behavior, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
33.
SvaraJames H. (1985). “Dichotomy and Duality: Reconceptualizing the Relationship Between Policy and Administration in Council-Manager Cities.” Public Administration Review45: 221–232.
34.
SvaraJames H. (1998). “The Politics-Administration Dichotomy Model as Aberration.” Public Administration Review58 (1): 51–58.
35.
SvaraJames H. (1999). “Conflict and Cooperation in Elected-Administrative Relations in Large-CouncilManager Cities.” State & Local Government Review31: 173–189.
36.
WildavskyAaron. (1964). The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little, Brown Publishers.
37.
WildavskyAaron. (1989). The Politics of the Budgetary Process. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown Publishers.
