The construct of public service motivation (PSM) has gained a lot of attention as a motivational force for joining the public sector. However, since its introduction by Perry and Wise (1990), research based on longitudinal data linking PSM with actual behavior, i.e. joining the public sector, has remained scarce, particularly with respect to Germany. Based on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (N = 672), we found PSM to be a relatively weak job preference. However, for Millennial job entrants, PSM was a significant antecedent of having chosen the public sector, even when controlling for other job preferences (material aspects, low work strain, and intrinsic job motivation). Further, women in our sample were more likely to have joined the public sector than men. This study therefore provides evidence for positive effects of PSM on public sector choice in the German Millennial generation. Limitations and avenues for further research are discussed, and implications of the results are illustrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BensonJ. & FleishmanJ.A. (1994). The robustness of maximum likelihood and distribution-free estimators to non-normality in confirmatory factor analysis. Quality & Quantity, 28(1), 117–136.
2.
BreitsohlH. & RuhleS. (2012). Differences in work-related attitudes between Millennials and Generation X: evidence from Germany. In: NgE. S., LyonsS. T. & SchweitzerL. (eds.) Managing the new workforce. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 107–129.
3.
BruchH., KunzeF. and BöhmS. (2010). ‘Führung von fünf Generationen am Arbeitsplatz’, in BruchH., KunzeF. and BöhmS. (eds), Generationen erfolgreich führen, Wiesbaden: Gabler, 87–136.
4.
BuelensM. & Van den BroeckH. (2007). An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation between Public and Private Sector Organizations. Public Administration Review, 65–74.
5.
ChristensenR. K., & WrightB. E. (2011). The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 723–743.
6.
ClerkinR. M & CoggburnJ. D. (2012). The Dimensions of Public Service Motivation and Sector Work Preferences. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(3), 209–235.
7.
CourseyD. H., & PandeyS. K. (2007). Public Service Motivation Measurement Testing an Abridged Version of Perry's Proposed Scale. Administration & Society, 39(5), 547–568.
8.
CostanzaD. P., BadgerJ. M., FraserR. L., SevertJ. B., & GadeP. A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375–394.
9.
DriesN., PepermansR., De KerpelE. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career: Is “statisfied” the new “successful”?. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 907–928.
10.
FrickJ. R., GoebelJ., EngelmannM. & RahmannU. (2010). The Research Data Center (RDC) of the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), Schmollers Jahrbuch, 130, 393–401.
11.
GiesselmannM. & StanevaM. (2011). BIOAGE17: The Youth Questionnaire. In: GoebelJ. (2011). Biography and Life History Data in the German Socio Economic Panel (SOEP, v28, 1984 – 2011). DIW, 131–142.
12.
HammerschmidtG., MeyerR. E. & Egger-PeitlerI. (2009). Das Konzept der Public Service Motivation – Status Quo der Internationalen Diskussion und Erste Empirische Evidenzen für den Deutschsprachigen Raum. Der moderne Staat, 2(1), 73–93.
13.
HartogJ. & OosterbeeckH. (1993). Public and private sector wages in the Netherlands. European Economic Review, 37(1), 97–114.
14.
HeadyF. (1995). Public administration: A comparative perspective. New York: Marcel Dekker.
15.
HolzerM. & SchwesterR. W. (2011). Public administration: An introduction. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
16.
HoustonD. J. (2011). Implications of occupational locus and focus for public service motivation: Attitudes toward work motives across nations. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 761–771.
17.
KimS. (2011). Testing a Revised Measure of Public Service Motivation: Reflective versus Formative Specification. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 521–546.
18.
KimS., VandenabeeleW., WrightB. E., AndersenL. B., CeraseF. P., ChristensenR. K., … & De VivoP. (2013). Investigating the Structure and Meaning of Public Service Motivation across Populations: Developing an International Instrument and Addressing Issues of Measurement Invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102.
19.
KjeldsenA. M. & JacobsenC. B. (2012). Public Service Motivation and Employment Sector: Attraction or Socialization?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1–28.
20.
Kristof-BrownA., & GuayR. P. (2011). Person–environment fit. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial/organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–50). Wash ington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
Kristof-BrownA. L., ZimmermanR. D., & JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of Individuals' Fit at Work: A Meta-Analysis of Person–Job, Person–Organization, Person–Group, and Person–Supervisor Fit. Personnel Psychology, 58 (2), 281–342.
22.
LeisinkP., & SteijnB. (2008). Recruitment, Attraction and Selection. In: PerryJ. L., HondeghemA. (eds.) Motivation in Public Management: The Call for Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–135.
23.
LewisG. B. & FrankS. A. (2002). Who Wants to Work for the Government?. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 395–404.
24.
LiuB., HuiC., Wensheng YangJ. H. & YuX. (2011). How well can public service motivation connect with occupational intention?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 191–211.
25.
LyonsS. T., DuxburyS. E. & HigginsC. A. (2006). A Comparison of the Values and Commitment of Private Sector, Public Sector, and Parapublic Sector Employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 605–618.
26.
LyonsS.T., DuxburyL., & HigginsC. (2007). An empirical assessment of generational differences in basic human values. Psychological Report, 101(2), 339–352.
27.
NgE.S., SchweitzerL. & LyonsS. T. (2010). ‘New generation, great expectations: a field study of the millennial generation’. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–92.
28.
NgE.S., LyonsS. T. & SchweitzerL. (2012). Managing the New Workforce International: Perspectives on the Millennial Generation.Edward Elgar Publishing, xvii–xxii.
29.
ParryE. & UrwinP. (2011). Generational Differences in Work values: A Review of Theory and Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 79–96.
30.
PengC. J., LeeK. L. & IngersollG. M. (2002). An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3–14.
31.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
32.
PerryJ. L. (1997). Antecedents of Public Service Motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 181–197.
33.
PerryJ. L. (2010). Introduction to the Symposium on Public Service Motivation Research. Public Administration Review, 679–680.
34.
PerryJ. L., HondeghemA. & WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
35.
PerryJ. L., & WiseL. R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.
36.
PetersP. G. & PierreJ. (2007). Introduction: The role of public administration in governing. In: PetersP. G. & PierreJ. (eds.) Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage, 1–10.
37.
PollittC. & BouckaertG. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
RaineyH. G. & BozemanB. (2000). Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–469.
39.
RaynerJ., WilliamsH. M., LawtonA., & AllinsonC. W. (2010). Public Service Ethos: Developing a Generic Measure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 27–51.
40.
ReichardC., & SchröterE. (2009). Der öffentliche Dienst im Wandel der Zeit: Tradierte Probleme, aktuelle Herausforderungen und künftige Reformperspektiven. Der moderne Staat–Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 2(1), 17–36.
41.
RitzA. & WaldnerC. (2011). Competing for Future Leaders: A Study of Attractiveness of Public Sector Organizations to Potential Job Applicants. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(2), 291–316.
42.
RobertsB. W., EdmondsG., & GrijalvaE. (2010). It Is Developmental Me, Not Generation Me Developmental Changes Are More Important Than Generational Changes in Narcissism—Commentary on Trzesniewski & Donnellan (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 97–102.
43.
SchneiderB. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40 (3), 437–453.
44.
SchneiderB., SmithD. B., & GoldsteinH. W. (2000). Attraction–selection–attrition: Toward a person– environment psychology of organizations. In: WalshW. B.CraikK. H. & PriceR. H. (eds.) (2000). Person– environment psychology: New directions and perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 61–85.
45.
SmolaK., & SuttonC. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 363–382.
46.
SteijnB. (2008). Person-environment fit and public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11 (1), 13–27.
47.
TaylorJ. (2012). ‘Public service motivation and work preferences of the Millennials in Australia’. In: NgE. S., LyonsS. T. & SchweitzerL. (eds.) Managing the new workforce. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 20–41.
48.
TerjesenS., VinnicombeS. & FreemanC. (2007). Attracting Generation Y graduates: Organisational attributes, likelihood to apply and sex differences. Career Development International, 12(6), 504–522.
49.
TwengeJ.M. (2010). ‘A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 201–10.
50.
TwengeJ. M., & CampbellS. M. (2012). ‘Who are the Millennials? Empirical evidence for generational differences in work values, attitudes and personality’. In: NgE. S., LyonsS. T. & SchweitzerL. (eds.) Managing the new workforce. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1–19.
51.
VandenabeeleW. (2008). Government Calling: Public Service Motivation as an Element in Selecting Government as an Employer of Choice. Public Administration, 86(4), 1089–1105.
52.
VandenabeeleW., ScheepersS., & HondeghemA. (2006). Public service motivation in an international comparative perspective: The UK and Germany. Public Policy and Administration, 16(1), 13–31.
53.
WagnerG. G., FrickJ. R. & SchuppJ. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) – Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.
54.
WrightB. E. & ChristensenR. K (2010). Public Service Motivation: A Test of the Job Attraction–Selection–Attrition Model. International Public Management Journal, 13(2), 155–176.
55.
WrightB. E. & GrantA. M. (2010). Unanswered Questions about Public Service Motivation: Designing Research to Address Key Issues of Emergence and Effects. Public Administration Review, 691–700.
