The Efficacy of public Participation in municipal Budgeting: An Exploratory Survey of officials in Government finance officers Association's Award-Winning Cities

Abstract

Municipal reformers often call for more public participation in the budget process. However, few studies have surveyed the viewpoints of budget practitioners on the efficacy of public involvement in municipal budgeting. In this paper, we report a survey administered by e-mail to budget directors in cities that won the Government Finance Officers Association's (GFOA) distinguished budget presentation award in 2011. The survey is based upon the research of Berner (2004) and the theoretical framework developed by Ebdon and Franklin (2006). We find that budget directors in the sampled cities view traditional participation methods, such as the public hearing, as the most effective, compared to more interactive and participatory methods. This viewpoint stands in contrast to the scholarly literature's normative arguments and empirical evidence that meaningful public input must be solicited early in the budgeting process through interactive methods.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnstein

S. R.

(1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216–224.

Arnstein

S. R.

(1975). A Working Model of Participation. Public Administration Review, 35 (1), 70–73.

Berner

(2004). Current Practices for Involving Citizens in Local Government Budgeting: Moving Beyond Method. Public Administration Quarterly, 27 (3), 410–432.

Biewen

(2012). Chicago Ward Gives Budgetary Power to the People. National Public Radio, Retrieved on March 14, 2014 from http://www.npr.org/2012/05/26/153747108/chicago-ward-gives-budgetary-power-to-the-people.

Ebdon

& Franklin

(2004). Searching for a Role for Citizens in the Budget Process. PublicBudget & Finance, 24 (1), 32–49.

Edbon

& Franklin

(2006). Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory. Public Administration Review, 66 (3), 437–447.

Government Finance Officers Association. (n.d.). About Us: Mission Statement. Retrieved from http://www.gfoa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=76&Itemid=96.

Guo

& Neshkova

(2013). Citizen Input in the Budget Process: When Does it Matter? The American Review of Public Administration, 43 (1), 331–346.

Herian

M. N.

(2011). Local Budgeting and Public Participation: Contextual Predictors of State Laws Mandating Public Input. State and Local Government Review, 43 (2), 95–109.

10.

Innes

J. E.

& Booher

D. E.

(2004). Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21^st Century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5 (4), 419–436.

11.

King

S. K.

, Feltey

K. M.

, & O'Neill Susel

(1998). The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Participation in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 58 (4), 317–326.

12.

Lee

& Kwak

Y. H.

(2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for Social Media-Based Public Engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (4), 492–503.

13.

Preisser

(1997). Citizen-Based Budgeting: The Redding, California Experiment. Public Management (PM), 79 (5), 18–21.

14.

Wang

(2001). Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Cities. Public Performance & Management Review, 24 (4), 322–336.

15.

Wang

& Wart

M. V.

(2007). When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers' Perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67 (2), 265–278.