In recent decades, in line with the ethos of democratization and market-driven reforms, there has emerged a growing trend towards decentering the state and transferring its power to various non-state actors, including local government institutions. In the developing world, although the principles and processes of decentralization have been introduced in order to enhance local-level accountability, the realization of such accountability has been greatly constrained or compromised due to various forms of social divides based on class, caste, and gender. This article explores these issues and concerns with special reference to selected South Asian countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amnesty International (2004). Women's Human Rights Violence and Discrimination: India. New York: Amnesty International USA.
2.
BeharA. and KumarY. (2002). Decentralisation in Madhya Pradesh, India: From Panchayati Raj to Gram Swaraj (1995 to 2001). Working Paper No.170, September, Overseas Development Institute, London.
3.
BoexJ., GudgeonP., and ShottonR. (2002). Role of UNDP in Promoting Local Governance and Decentralization in Bangladesh. Report of the Initial SPPD Scoping Mission. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
4.
ChattopadhyayR. and DufloE. (2003). The Impact of Reservation in the Panchayati Raj: Evidence from a Nationwide Randomized Experiment. Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
DainisA.P. (1999). “Country Paper: Sri Lanka,”. in UNESCAP (ed.), Local Government in Asia and the Pacific.Bangkok: UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
10.
DrezeJ. and SenA. (2002). “Democratic Practice and Social Inequality in India.” Journal of Asian and African Studies37(2): 6–37.
11.
GaihaR. and KulkarniV. (2002). “Panchayats, Communities, and the Rural Poor in India.” Journal of Asian and African Studies37(2): 38–82.
12.
GunatilakeM. (2001). “State of Women in Urban Local Government Sri Lanka,”. in UNESCAP (ed.), Women in Local Government in Asia and the Pacific.Bangkok: UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
13.
HaqueM.S. (1997). “Editorial Introduction: Local Governance in Developing Nations: Reexamining the Question of Accountability.” Regional Development Dialogue18(2): iii–xxiii.
14.
HRW (Human Rights Watch) (1999). Broken People: Caste Violence Against India's ‘Untouchables’. New York: Human Rights Watch.
15.
HRW (Human Rights Watch) (2001). Caste Discrimination: A Global Concern. New York: Human Rights Watch.
16.
IslamN. (1999). “Country Paper: Bangladesh,”. in UNESCAP (ed.), Local Government in Asia and the Pacific.Bangkok: UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
17.
MahatR.S. (2003). “Democracy in a Plural Society: A Case of Nepal.” Paper presented at the seminar on Pluralism, Democracy and Conflict Resolution, 20–21 February, New Delhi, India.
18.
MathewG. (2002). Panchayati Raj Institutions and Human Rights in India. Geneva: International Council on Human Rights Policy.
MontesR. (2002). “India: Panchayats–Decentralization to the Grassroots,”. in BrillantesA.B. and CuachonN.G. (eds.), Decentralization & Powershift: An Imperative for Good Governance.Manila: Asian Resource Center for Decentralization, University of the Philippines.
21.
MoscareD.L.O. (2002). “Bangladesh: Decentralizing Governance,”. in BrillantesA.B. and CuachonN.G. (eds.), Decentralization & Powershift: An Imperative for Good Governance.Manila: Asian Resource Center for Decentralization, University of the Philippines.
22.
NayakP. (1995). “Economic Development and Social Exclusion in India,”. in De HaanA. and NayakP. (eds.), Social Exclusion and South Asia.Geneva: International Labour Organization.
23.
NazR. (2001). “Report of the State of Women in Urban Local Government Pakistan,”. in UNESCAP (ed.), Women in Local Government in Asia and the Pacific.Bangkok: UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
24.
ParkerA.N. (1995). Decentralization: The Way Forward for Rural Development? Policy Research Working Paper No.1475, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
25.
Poornima and VyasuluV. (1999). “Women in Panchayati Raj: Grassroots Democracy in India–Experience from Malgudi.” Paper presented at the Meeting on Women and Political Participation: 21st Century Challenges, 24–26 March, New Delhi, India.
26.
RanaM. (2000). “Democracy and Poverty in South Asia: Participation.” Paper presented at South Asian Regional Workshop on Democracy and Poverty: A Missing Link?, 10–11 April, Kathmandu, Nepal.
27.
ReyesS. and AzizahW. (2002). Quotas for Women for Legislative Seats at the Local Level in Pakistan. Stockholm: International IDEA.
28.
RondinelliD.A. (1983). “Implementing Decentralization Programmes in Asia: A Comparative Analysis.” Public Administration and Development3(3): 181–207.
ShresthaS.D. (2001). “Report on the State of Women in Urban Local Government Nepal,”. in UNESCAP (ed.), Women in Local Government in Asia and the Pacific: A Comparative Analysis of Thirteen Countries.Bangkok: UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.
31.
SilwalU.K. (2003). “Need for Restructuring Local Bodies.” Kathmandu Post (Nepal), 29 April.
32.
SlaterR. and PrestonA. (2004). “Local Governance and Service Delivery to the Poor: Bangladesh Case Study,”. in UNCDF (ed.), Local Government Initiative: Pro-Poor Infrastructure and Service Delivery in Asia.New York: United Nations Capital Development Fund.
TimsinaN.P. (2002). “Empowerment vis-à-vis Marginalisation: A Mix Response from the Decentralised Institutions for Sustainable Resource Management.” Paper presented at the Bishkek Global Mountain Summit, 23–28 April, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
35.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2002). Human Development Report 2002. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2003). Fiscal Transfer to Local Government in Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: UNDP.
37.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2005). Human Development Report 2005. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
UNESCAP (UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific) (1997). Report of the Regional Workshop on Women in Urban Local Governments in South Asia, Allahabad, India. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP.
39.
UNESCAP (UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific), ed. (1999). Local Government in Asia and the Pacific: A comparative Study of Fifteen Countries. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP.
40.
UNESCAP (UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific), ed. (2001). Women in Local Government in Asia and the Pacific: A Comparative Analysis of Thirteen Countries. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCAP.
41.
WestergaardK. (2000). “Decentralization in Bangladesh: Local Government and NGOs.” Paper presented at the Colloquium on Decentralization and Development, 7 April, Department of Political Science, Yale University, USA.
42.
WijetungeK.H. (2001). “Sri Lanka.” Paper presented at the APO Seminar on Effective Decentralization for Community Development, 23–31 March, Sri Lanka.
43.
WinterM. (2004). “Local Government Infrastructure and Service Delivery: A Case Study of the Decentralized Financing and Development Programme—Nepal,”. in UNCDF (ed.), Local Government Initiative: Pro-Poor Infrastructure and Service Delivery in Asia.New York: United Nations Capital Development Fund.
44.
ZafarullahH.M. and HuqueA.S. (1998). “Public Management in South Asia: Dimensions and Directions of Change.” International Journal of Public Administration21(10): 1473–1498.
