This article addresses the accountability practices in the Netherlands. It is argued that during the past few decades, nearly all constituting elements of classic accountability have been abandoned. The new practices involve audits, monitoring, performance measurement, evaluation, etc. It is argued that these practices have some serious side-effects, namely that accountability procedures have deteriorated in standard operations, resulting in an increase of administrative cost, insignificance, biased accounts, and ambiguous responsibility. The article concludes by a plea to reconsider the merits of modern managerial accountability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelbergS. and BatsonD. (1978). “Accountability and Helping: When Needs Exceed Resources.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36(4): 343–350.
2.
AkerlofG. (1970). “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics84(3): 488–500.
3.
AnerachioF. and JacobsJ.B. (1996). The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
4.
AyeniV.O. (2004). New dimensions in Promoting Accountability in Public Administration – International and Theoretical Overview (draft version).
Bemelmans-VidecM.L. (2003). “Auditing and Evaluating Collaborative Government: The Rle of Supreme Audit Institutions,”. in GreyA., JenkinsB., and LeeuwF. (eds.), Collaboration in Public Services.New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
7.
BoogJ.J., TomM.J.F. and JansenM. (2002). Monitor Administratieve Lasten Bedrijven 2002. The Hague, Netherlands: EIM.
8.
BooneJ. and PottersJ. (2002). Transparency, Prices, and Welfare with Imperfect Substitutes. CEPR Discussion Paper No.3256; Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University, Netherlands.
9.
DayP. and KleinR. (1987). Accountabilities: Five Public Services. London: Tavistock.
10.
De ValkW. and De VriesM.S. (1994). “Criteria voor Milieu-effectrapporten.” Beleidswetenschap, 8 (3): 274–304.
11.
DubnickM.J. (2002). “Seeking Salvation for Accountability.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Conference, Boston, USA.
12.
FinerS.E.The History of Government; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999.
13.
HibbittC. (2004). External Environmental Disclosure and Reporting by Large European Companies (dissertation). Amsterdam, Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.
14.
JackallR. (1988). Moral Mazes: The world of Corporate Managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
MarchJ.G. and FeldmanM.S. (1981). “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol.” Administrative Science Quarterly26(1): 171–190.
16.
Ministry of Economic Affairs (2003). Annual Report 2002, Competition, Deregulation and Legislation. The Hague, Netherlands: Ministry of Economic Affairs.
17.
MøllgaardH.P. and OvergaardP.B. (2000). Market Transparency: A Mixed Blessing. Discussion Paper No.1999–15. Center for Industrial Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
18.
NRC (gazette) February 7th, 2004.
19.
OESO (2001). Price Transparency.Directorate General for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs, Committee on Competition Law and Policy, 11 September.
20.
OlsonO., HumphreyC. and GuthrieJ. (2001). “Caught in an Evaluatory Trap: A Dilemma for Public Services under NPFM.” The European Accounting Review10(3): 505–522.
21.
PaulS. (1992). “Accountability in Public Services: Exit, Voice and Control.” World Development20(7): 1047–1060.
22.
PowerM. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
SabineG.H. and ThorstonT.L. (1973). A history of Political Theory, 4th edition. Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.
24.
StiglitzJ.E. (1988). Economics of the Public Sector. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
25.
Stuiveling, S.J. (President of the Netherlands Court of Audit) (2003). “Building Public Trust and the role of the Internal Auditor.” Paper presented at the EURAC Seminar, September 12, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
26.
TukkerTerpstra (2001). Organisatieonderzoek Cadans Arnhem.TerpstraTukker, Bosch en Duin.
27.
Vab ThijnE., AlinkF., and Van DijkP. (eds.) (1998). De sorry-democratie. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Van Gennep.
28.
Van der KnaapP. (1997). Lerende” overheid, intelligent beleid. The Hague, Netherlands: Phaedrus.
29.
Van ThielS. (2001). Quangocratisation, Trends, Causes and Consequences. Aldershot, UK: Darmouth Publishing.
30.
Zapico-GoniE. (1997). “Performance Monitoring for Budget Management,”. in MayneJ. and Zapico-GoniE. (eds.), Monitoring Performance in the Public Sector.New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
