Urban theories are built upon an understanding garnered from studying larger cities and major metropolitan areas. In this article, we examine use a case study that focuses on the political and managerial challenges faced by a smaller metropolitan area under conditions of rapid growth and demographic change. The case provides a foil for the normative components of urban theory and we offer a contrast between prescription and the insights provided by the case.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottC. (1987). The new urban America: Growth and politics in sunbelt cities. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
2.
AchebeC. (1959). Things fall apart. New York: Fawcett Crest by Ballantine Books.
3.
ArnoldD. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
4.
BanfieldE. C. and WilsonJ. Q. (1963). City politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5.
BellahR. N. (1985). ed. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BlakelyE. J. (1989). Plannning local economic development: Theory and practice. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
7.
ClarkeS., StaeheliL. A. and BrunellL. (1997). “Women redefining local politics”. In JudgeD., StokerG., and WolmanH. (Eds.), Theories of urban politics. London: Sage Publications.
8.
DiGaetanoA. (1997). Urban governing alignments and realignments in comparative perspective: Developmental politics in Boston, Massachussetts and Bristol, England, 1980–1996. Urban Affairs Review, 32 (6): 844–870.
9.
ElazarD. (Ed.) (1986). Cities of the prairie revisited: The closing of the metropolitan frontier. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
10.
EisingerP. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
11.
FeaginJ. R.E. (1988). Free enterprise city: Houston in political and economic perspective. New Brunswick,: Rutgers University Press.
12.
FeiockR. C. and CarrJ. (2001). Incentives, entrepreneurs, and boundary changes: A collective action framework. Urban Affairs Review, 36 (3): 382–405.
13.
GabrisG.T., GrenellK., IhrkeD. M. and KaatzJ. (2000). Managerial innovation at the local level: Some effects of administrative leadership and governing board behavior. Public Productivity and Management Review, 23 (4). 486–494.
14.
GainesboroughJ. F. (2001). Fenced off: The suburbanization of American politics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
15.
GulickL. (1937). Notes on the theory of organization. In GulickL. and UrwickL. (Eds.) Papers on the science of administration.New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
16.
HardingA. (1997). Elite theory and growth machines. In JudgeD., StokerG., and WolmanH. (Eds.), Theories of urban politics. London: Sage Publications.
17.
HerrickB. and KindlebergerC.P. (1983). Economic development. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishers.
18.
KanterR. M. (1979). Power failure in management circuits”. Harvard Business Review. 57 (4).
19.
LoganJ. and MolotchH. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
MayerH. J. and GreenbergM.R. (2001). Coming back from economic despair: Case studies of small- and medium-size American cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 15 (3): 203–16.
21.
PaganoM. and BowmanA. O'M. (1995). Cityscapes and capital: The politics of urban development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22.
PetersonP. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
PetersonP. (1995). The price of federalism. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
24.
PolsbyN. W. (1963). Community power and political theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
25.
PressmanJ. and WildavskyA. (1984). 3rd ed. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster Publishers.
27.
ReeseL. and RosenfeldR. (2002). The civic culture of local economic development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
28.
RenaudB. (1981). National urbanization policy in developing countries. Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development with Oxford University Press.
29.
RubinI. S. and RubinH.J. (1987). Economic development incentives: The poor (cities) pay more. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23 (1): 37–62.
30.
ShefterM. (1985). Political crisis/fiscal crisis: The collapse and revival of New York City. New York: Basic Books.
31.
SimonH.A. (1946). The proverbs of administration. Public Administration Review, 6: 53–67.
32.
StaeheliL.A., KodrasJ.E. and FlintC. (Eds.) (1997). State devolution in America: Implications for a diverse society. Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, No 48. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
33.
StiversC. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
34.
StoneC. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: The University Press of Kansas.
35.
SvaraJ. H. (1994). Facilitative leadership in local government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
36.
SwanstromT. (1985). The crisis of growth politics: Cleveland, Kucinich, and the challenge of urban populism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
37.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington D.C.
38.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001a). Table 5: Metropolitan areas ranked by percent population change: 1990 and 2000. In Ranking tables for metropolitan areas: 1990 and 2000. Washington, D.C.http://www.census.gov/population/cen2000/phc-t3/tab05.pdf, released April 2, 2001.
39.
ZimmermanJ. (1992). Contemporary American federalism: The growth of national power. New York: Praeger Press.
