The Gasb'S Initiative to Require Sea Reporting

Abstract

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is exploring an initiative that would require state and local governments to engae in performance measurement. The GASB maintains that governmental entities must embrace "service efforts and accomplishments" (SEA) \reporting for accountability to be fully realized. This article examines the feasibility of mandating SEA reporting for state and local governments concluding that a reporting cannot be approved based on the six characteristics that support general purpose external financial reporting. A reporting requirement is only possible if it were based and supported on the broader definition of accountability embraced by the GASB which includes the operational performance of governmental entities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ammons

David N.

(1966). Municipal Benchmarks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Barrett

Katherine

and Greene

Richard

(2000). "Truth in Measurement." Governing 13 (July):86.

Bhornlund

Lydia

(1999). Beyond Data. Washington D.C.:

International City/County Management Association, Center for Performance Measurement.

Bowman

James S.

and Hellein

Russell

(1998). "Total Quality Management in Florida: Implementation in State Agencies." Public Administration Quarterly 22 (Spring): 114–129.

Coe

Charles

(1999). "Local Government Benchmarking: Lessons from Two Major Multigovernment Efforts." Public Administration Review 59(March/April):110–123.

Fischer

Richard J.

(1994). "An Overview of Performance Measurement." Public Management 76 (September):S2–S8.

Gauthier

Stephen J.

(1998). "Applying Full-Cost Accounting to Solid-Waste Management Operations." Government Finance Review 14 (August): 19–22.

Government Accounting Standards Board (1994). Objectives of Financial Reporting. Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Foundation.

Government Accounting Standards Board (1994). Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting. Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Foundation.

10.

Grifel

Stuart S.

(1993). "Performance Measurement and Budgetary Decision Making." Public Budgeting & Management Review 16 (Summer):403–436.

11.

Hatry

Harry P.

(1980). "Performance Measurement Principles and Techniques: An Overview for Local Government." Public Productivity Review 4 (December):312–339.

12.

Hatry

Harry P.

et al. (eds.). Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting: Its Time Has Come. Norwalk, CT: Government Accounting Standards Board.

13.

Mullins

Daniel R.

and Zorn

C. Kurt

(1999). "Is Activity-Bases Costing Up to the Challenge When It Comes to Privatization of Local Government Services?" Public Budgeting and Finance 19 (Summer): 17–58.

14.

Rago

William V.

(1996). "Straggles in Transformation: A Study in TQM, Leadership, and Organizational Culture in a Government Agency." Public Administration Review 56 (May/June):227–234.

15.

Rivenbark

William C.

(2000). "The Role of Capital Cost in Performance Measurement and Benchmarking." Public Performance & Management Review 24 (September):22–29.

16.

Rivenbark

William C.

(2000). "The Art of Using Performance and Cost Data." Local Finance Bulletin. Chapel Hills: University of North Carolina, Institute of Government.

17.

Rivenbark

William C.

and Carter

K. Lee

(2000). "Benchmarking and Cost Accounting: The North Carolina Approach." Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 12 (Spring): 125–137.

18.

Streib

Gregory

and Theodore

H. Poister

(1998). "Performance Measurement in Municipal Governments." Municipal Year Book. Washington D.C.:

International City/County Management Association.