Carefully conducted analyses are prepared regularly by and for U.S. municipalities providing important information on a range of issues facing these governments. A review of selected examples, along with information on the qualifications and training of beginning analysts in 50 large municipalities, suggests that much of the analysis in the field relies heavily on the application of management science techniques and basic descriptive statistics. Less evidence points toward the extensive use of intermediate or advanced social science statistics, despite the potential applicability of these tools and their prominence in graduate curricula.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
City of Albuquerque (2000). Strategic Management Guide.Albuquerque: Author, Office of Management and Operations Improvement.
2.
City of Kansas City Auditor's Office (1998). Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department Patrol Deployment: Blackout Analysis.Kansas City, MO: Author.
3.
City of Pittsburgh Office of City Controller (1996). Performance Audit: Department of Public Safety Office of Professional Standards.Pittsburgh: Author.
4.
City of San Diego (undated).Program Evaluation: Productivity Improvement Training Manual.San Diego: Author, Financial Management Department.
5.
City of Savannah (1978). Analyst Manual: Resource Management and Control System, Savannah:Author.
6.
City of Savannah (1999). 1999 Service Program and Budget.Savannah: Author.
7.
City of Savannah (1996). Continuous Improvement Process: Quality Services for Quality Living.Savannah: Author.
8.
City of St. Petersburg (1975). Evaluation Process Handbook for Local Government Services: A Program Evaluation Guide.St. Petersburg, FL: Author, Management Improvement Department.
9.
DeLorenzoLisa "Stars Aren't Stupid But Our Methodological Training Is." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory11 (Jan-uary):139–145.
10.
FitzpatrickJody (2000). "What Are Our Goals in Teaching Research Methods to Public Administrators?" Journal of Public Affairs Education6 (July):l75–181.
11.
GillJeffrey and KennethJ. Meier (2000). "Public Administration Research and Practice: A Methodological Manifesto." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10 (January):157–199.
12.
HyRonald J. and GaryH. Brooks (1984). "An Assessment of Evaluation Skill Needs in State Evaluation Agencies in the South." Review of Public Personnel Administration5 (Fall):25–33.
13.
International City/County Management Association (2001). "Practices for Effective Local Government Management." www.icma.org.
14.
La PlanteJosephine M. (1989). "Research Methods Education for Public Sector Careers: The Challenge of Utilization." Policy Studies Review8 (Summer):845–851.
15.
National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (2000). Commission on Peer Review and Accreditation (COPRA) Standards for Professional Masters Degree Programs in Public Affairs, Policy and Administration.www.naspa.org/copra/stan-dards.hrrm.
16.
NuttPaul C. (1999). "Public/Private Differences and the Assessments of Alternatives for Decision Making." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (April):309–349.
17.
RobinsonCharles L.K. (1995). "The Effects of Caseload on Code Enforcement Case Completions." Mount Pleasant, MI:Central Michigan University, Paper submitted for Master of Science in Administration degree.
18.
RobinsonCharles L.K. (2001). Correspondence by e-mail, April 24.
19.
WaughWilliam L.Jr., RonaldJohn Hy, and JeffreyL. Brudney (1994). "Policy Analysis Skills, Microcomputers, and Public Administration Education." Public Productivity Review9 (Summer/Fall):165–174.
20.
WaughWilliam L.Jr., RonaldJohn Hy, and JeffreyL. Brudney (1994). "Quantitative Analyses and Skill Building in Public Administration Graduate Education." Public Administration Quarterly18 (Summer):204–222.
