Despite the increasing frequency in spot ignition by embers in wildfires, research on the multiple physicochemical processes intrinsic to ember combustion is limited. In this study, a two-dimensional computational model was proposed to study the glowing combustion of a wooden ember. A global char oxidation reaction was used to represent the glowing combustion of the ember. A parametric study showed that the porosity, heat of reaction, and oxygen concentration were the most influential parameters on the ember combustion. Then, the model was compared to a series of bench-scale experiments in terms of glowing time and thermal response of a non-reacting substrate when exposed to a hot ember. The simulation results showed that ember combustion was mostly diffusion-controlled rather than kinetic-controlled. Thus, given the ember diversities in spotting fire, modelers should pay more attention to the difference in the physical properties instead of the kinetics between ember species.
RadeloffVCHammerRBStewartSI, et al. The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl2005; 15(3): 799–805.
2.
Fernandez- PelloAC. Wildland fire spot ignition by sparks and firebrands. Fire Safe J2017; 91: 2–10.
3.
EllisP.Fuelbed ignition potential and bark morphology explain the notoriety of the eucalypt messmate “stringybark” for intense spotting. Int J Wildland Fire2011; 20(7): 897–907.
4.
GanteaumeALampin-MailletCGuijarroM, et al. Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds. Int J Wildland Fire2009; 18(8): 951–969.
5.
ManzelloSLClearyTGShieldsJR, et al. On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands. Fire Mater2006; 30(1): 77–87.
6.
FateevVAgafontsevMVolkovS, et al. Determination of smoldering time and thermal characteristics of firebrands under laboratory conditions. Fire Safe J2017; 91: 791–799.
7.
ScottSHaddenRFereresS, et al. Ignition of combustible fuel beds by embers and heated particles. In: Fall Technical Meeting Western States Section/Combustion Institute, University of California, Irvine, CA, 16–17October2023, pp. 26–27. Pittsburgh, PA: The Combustion Institute.
8.
WangSDingPLinS, et al. Smoldering and flaming of disc wood particles under external radiation: autoignition and size effect. Front Mech Eng2021; 7: 686638.
9.
WangSDingPLinS, et al. Deformation of wood slice in fire: Interactions between heterogeneous chemistry and thermomechanical stress. Proc Combust Inst2021; 38(3): 5081–5090.
10.
WoycheeseJ. Wooden disk combustion for spot fire spread. In: The ninth international fire science and engineering conference (INTERFLAM), Edinburgh, 17–19 September 2001. London: Interscience Communicaton.
11.
ZhangZDingPWangS, et al. Smouldering-to-flaming transition on wood induced by glowing char cracks and cross wind. Fuel2023; 352: 129091.
12.
ManzelloSLParkS-HClearyTG.Investigation on the ability of glowing firebrands deposited within crevices to ignite common building materials. Fire Safe J2009; 44(6): 894–900.
13.
HakesRSSalehizadehHWeston-DawkesMJ, et al. Thermal characterization of firebrand piles. Fire Safe J2019; 104: 34–42.
14.
SalehizadehH.Critical ignition conditions of structural materials by cylindrical firebrands. Master Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 2019.
15.
TaoZBathrasBKwonB, et al. Effect of firebrand size and geometry on heating from a smoldering pile under wind. Fire Safe J2021; 120: 103031.
16.
BearingerEDHodgesJLYangF, et al. Localized heat transfer from firebrands to surfaces. Fire Safe J2021; 120: 103037.
17.
UrbanJLVicariottoMDunn-RankinD, et al. Temperature measurement of glowing embers with color pyrometry. Fire Tech2019; 55: 1013–1026.
18.
NazareSLeventonIDavisR.Ignitibility of structural wood products exposed to embers during wildland fires: a review of literature. NIST Technical Note2021; 2153.
19.
Abul-hudaYM. Development of a spatially resolved optical technique for measuring heat flux and thermal footprint of firebrand piles. NIST Technical Note2019; 205228.
20.
JuXConklingMHajilouM, et al. Laboratory quantification of firebrand generation from WUI fuels for model development. Fire Safe J2023; 141: 103921.
21.
ManzelloSLSuzukiS.The new and improved NIST Dragon’s LAIR (Lofting and Ignition Research) facility. Fire Mater2012; 36(8): 623–635.
22.
WadhwaniRSullivanCWickramasingheA, et al. A review of firebrand studies on generation and transport. Fire Safe J2022; 134: 103674.
23.
LautenbergerCFernandez-PelloA.Spotting ignition of fuel beds by firebrands. WIT Trans Model Simul2009; 48: 603–612.
24.
WareyA.Influence of thermal contact on heat transfer from glowing firebrands. Case Stud Thermal Eng2018; 12: 301–311.
25.
LinSWangSHuangX.Modeling smoldering ignition by an irradiation spot. Fire Safe J2022; 134: 103708.
26.
SantamariaSKempnáKThomasJC, et al. Investigation of structural wood ignition by firebrand accumulation. In: First International Conference on Structures Safety Under Fire Blast, Glasgow, 17September2015. Hefei, China: University of Science and Technology of China.
27.
MagnaterraMFuscoJOchoaJ, et al. Kinetic study of the reaction of different hardwood sawdust chars with oxygen. Chemical and structural characterization of the samples. In: BridgwaterAV (ed.) Advances in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion. New York: Springer, 1993, pp. 116–130.
28.
BoonmeeNQuintiereJ.Glowing ignition of wood: the onset of surface combustion. Proc Combust Inst2005; 30(2): 2303–2310.
29.
SongZ.Modelling oxygen-limited and self-sustained smoldering propagation: Underground coal fires driven by thermal buoyancy. Combust Flame2022; 245: 112382.
30.
SaidiMHajaligolMMhaisekarA, et al. A 3D modeling of static and forward smoldering combustion in a packed bed of materials. Appl Math Model2007; 31(9): 1970–1996.
31.
Van KuijkHVan OijenJBastiaansR, et al. Reverse combustion: Kinetically controlled and mass transfer controlled conversion front structures. Combust Flame2008; 153(3): 417–433.
32.
JanseAMde JongeHGPrinsW, et al. Combustion kinetics of char obtained by flash pyrolysis of pine wood. Ind Eng Chem Res1998; 37(10): 3909–3918.
33.
Anca-CouceAZobelNBergerA, et al. Smouldering of pine wood: Kinetics and reaction heats. Combust Flame2012; 159(4): 1708–1719.
34.
ManzelloSLClearyTGShieldsJR, et al. Ignition of mulch and grasses by firebrands in wildland–urban interface fires. Int J Wildland Fire2006; 15(3): 427–431.
35.
LautenbergerCFernandez-PelloC.Generalized pyrolysis model for combustible solids. Fire Safe J2009; 44(6): 819–839.
36.
RaglandKAertsDBakerA.Properties of wood for combustion analysis. Bioresource Tech1991; 37(2): 161–168.
37.
JanssensM. Thermo-physical properties for wood pyrolysis models. In: Pacific Timber Engineering Conference, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 11–15July1994. Canberra, ACT, Australia: National Library of Australia.
38.
GroenliMG. A theoretical and experimental study of the thermal degradation of biomass. Ph.D. Thesis, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 1996.
39.
UrbanJLZakCDSongJ, et al. Smoldering spot ignition of natural fuels by a hot metal particle. Proc Combust Inst2017; 36(2): 3211–3218.
40.
Di BlasiC. Processes of flames spreading over the surface of charring fuels: effects of the solid thickness. Combust Flame1994; 97(2): 225–239.
41.
YovanovichM. New contact and gap conductance correlations for conforming rough surfaces. In: AIAA 16th thermophysics conference, Palo Alto, CA, 23–25June1982 (AIAA Paper No. 81-1164). Reston, VA: AIAA.
42.
HuangXRestucciaFGramolaM, et al. Experimental study of the formation and collapse of an overhang in the lateral spread of smouldering peat fires. Combust Flame2016; 168: 393–402.
43.
YangJLiuNChenH, et al. Effects of atmospheric oxygen on horizontal peat smoldering fires: Experimental and numerical study. Proc Combust Inst2019; 37(3): 4063–4071.
44.
YangJWangSChenH.Effect of interface thermal resistance on ignition of reactive material by a hot particle. Int J Heat Mass Trans2016; 97: 146–156.
45.
HambyDM.A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environ Monit Asses1994; 32: 135–154.
46.
YuanHRestucciaFRichterF, et al. A computational model to simulate self-heating ignition across scales, configurations, and coal origins. Fuel2019; 236: 1100–1109.
47.
UrbanJLZakCDFernandez-PelloC.Cellulose spot fire ignition by hot metal particles. Proc Combust Inst2015; 35(3): 2707–2714.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
