The “Steiner Tunnel” test, which is standardized under ASTM E84 and UL 723, is used to comparatively assess surface-burning characteristics, namely, flame spread and smoke release from a wide range of building materials and assemblies. While the method is well known to fire safety engineers, it is not as well understood by material scientists who develop new fire safe materials that will meet this test. Understanding how the test measures flammability and smoke is critical to designing materials that can meet requirements that reference E84 and UL 723. This article primarily discusses the ASTM E84 test, discusses the history of the method, how it measures flame spread and smoke release, and how mounting samples in the test method affects flame spread and smoke release. Finally, there is discussion on test methods that could be used for qualitative screening tools for materials developed for the E84 test.
ASTM E84-23. Standard test method for surface burning characteristics of building materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2023.
2.
AbramsMSD’SouzaMVHigginsonP, et al. Review of ASTM test for surface burning characteristics of building materials (E84) (An ASTM white paper). J Test Eval1985; 13: 89–114.
3.
SteinerAJ.Fire hazard classification of building materials. Bulletin of research no. 32, September 1944. Northbrook, IL: Underwriters’ Laboratories Inc.
4.
SteinerAJ. Historical background of the fire protection department, Underwriters’ Laboratories, Inc. In: BrandonM (ed.) The departments of Underwriters’ Laboratories, Inc. Northbrook, IL: Underwriters’ Laboratories Inc, 1964.
Flammability studies of cellular plastics and other building materials used for interior finishes. Subject report no. 723, 13 June 1975. Northbrook, IL: Underwriters’ Laboratories.
SorathiaULongGGracikT, et al. Screening tests for fire safety of composites for marine applications. Fire Mater2001; 25: 215–222.
12.
MIL-STD-3020. Department of defense standard practice: fire resistance of U.S. Naval surface ships, 2007.
13.
NFPA 262. Standard method of test for flame travel and smoke of wires and cables for use in air-handling spaces.
14.
Interlaboratory study to establish precision statements for E84, standard test method for surface burning characteristics of building materials. Research report no. ISR E05-0001, 1 November 1994. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
15.
BabrauskasVWhiteJAUrbasJ.Testing for surface spread of flame: new tests to come into use. Build Stand1997; 66: 13–18.
StevensMCoutelenP.Comparison of fiber-reinforced polymers in global fire performance tests. In: MorganABWilkieCANelsonGL (eds) Fire and polymers VI: new advances in flame retardant chemistry and science (ACS symposium series #1118). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2012, pp. 481–494.
18.
RowenJB.FR veil provides low cost model to achieve ASTM E-84 class A smoke index. In: American Composites Manufacturers Association (ACMA) conference proceedings, Anaheim, CA, 1–3 October 2003.
19.
DietenbergerMAWhiteRH. Reaction-to-fire testing and modeling for wood products. In: 12th annual BCC conference on flame retardancy, Stamford, CT, 21–23 May 2001.
20.
DietenbergerMAGrexaOWhiteRH, et al. Room/corner tests of wall linings with 100/300 kW burner. In: Proceedings of 4th international fire and materials conference, Crystal City, Washington, 15–16 November 1995, pp. 53–62. London: Interscience Communications.
21.
WhiteRHDietenbergerMA. Cone calorimeter evaluation of wood products. In: 15th annual BCC conference on flame retardancy, Stamford, CT, 21–23 May 2004.
22.
AyrilmisNCandanZWhiteR.Physical, mechanical, and fire properties of oriented strandboard with fire retardant treated veneers. Holz Roh Werkst2007; 65: 449–458.
23.
WhiteRHDietenbergerMAStarkNM. Cone calorimeter tests of wood-based decking materials. In: 18th annual BCC conference on flame retardancy, Stamford, CT, 21–23 May 2007.
24.
JanssensMHuczekJSaucedaA. Development of a model of the ASTM E84 Steiner Tunnel test. In: Proceedings of the ninth international fire safety science (IAFSS) symposium, Karlsruhe, 21–26 September 2008, pp. 279–290, https://publications.iafss.org/publications/fss/9/279
25.
ASTM C1288-17. Standard specification for fiber-cement interior substrate sheets. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2017.
26.
ASTM C1186-22. Standard specification for flat fiber-cement sheets. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2022.
27.
MorganABGalaskaML.Flammability testing of wool/cellulosic and wool/synthetic fiber blends: vertical flame spread and heat release results. J Fire Sci2020; 38: 522–551.
28.
DiNennoPJDrysdaleDBeylerCL, et al. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 4th ed.Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, 2008.
29.
JanssensM. Effects of substrates and support systems on ASTM E84 performance. In: ASTM E05 research review, Seattle, WA, 14 June 2022.
30.
HasburghLECraftSTVan ZeelandI, et al. Relative humidity versus moisture content relationship for several commercial wood species and its potential effect on flame spread. Fire Mater2019; 43: 365–372.
31.
ASTM E2769-11. Extended duration surface burning characteristics of building materials (30 min tunnel test). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2018.
32.
FabianTZ.Fire performance properties of solid wood and lignocellulose-plastic composite deck boards. Fire Technol2014; 50: 125–141.
RossiMCaminoGLudaM-P.Characterisation of smoke in expanded polystyrene combustion. Polym Degrad Stab2001; 74: 507–512.
35.
MountassirATirriTSundP, et al. Sulfenamides as standalone flame retardants for polystyrene. Polym Degrad Stab2021; 188: 109588.
36.
PawelecWAubertMPfaendnerR, et al. Triazene compounds as a novel and effective class of flame retardants for polypropylene. Polym Degrad Stab2012; 97: 948–954.
37.
PeacockRDAverillJDRenekePA, et al. Characteristics of fire scenarios in which sublethal effects of smoke are important. Fire Technol2004; 40: 127–147.
38.
ButlerKMMullhollandGW.Generation and transport of smoke components. Fire Technol2004; 40: 149–176.
39.
NeviaserJLGannRG.Evaluation of toxic potency values for smoke from products and materials. Fire Technol2004; 40: 177–199.
40.
BlomqvistPRosellLSimonsonM.Emissions from fires part I: fire retarded and non-fire retarded TV-sets. Fire Technol2004; 40: 39–58.
41.
BlomqvistPRosellLSimonsonM.Emissions from fires part II: fire retarded and non-fire retarded TV-sets. Fire Technol2004; 40: 59–73.
42.
RabieiAKarimpourKJanssensM, et al. Simulated pool fire testing and modeling of a composite metal foam. Fire Mater2021; 45: 379–386.
43.
KramerRHZammaranoMLinterisGT, et al. Heat release and structural collapse of flexible polyurethane foam. Polym Degrad Stab2010; 95: 1115–1122.
44.
SchartelBBartholmaiMKnollU.Some comments on the use of cone calorimeter data. Polym Degrad Stab2005; 88: 540–547.
45.
QuintiereJG.A theoretical basis for flammability properties. Fire Mater2006; 30: 175–214.
46.
LyonREQuintiereJG.Criteria for piloted ignition of combustible solids. Combust Flame2007; 151: 551–559.
47.
ASTM E135-19a. Standard tests method for assessing combustibility of materials using a vertical tube furnace at 750°C. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2019.
48.
HirschlerMM.Procedures for development and revision of codes and standards associated with fire safety in the USA. Fire Mater2017; 41: 1058–1071.
49.
ASTM E2231-21. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mounting of pipe and duct insulation materials to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2021.
50.
ASTM E2404-22. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mounting of textile, paper or polymeric (including vinyl) and wood wall or ceiling coverings, facings and veneers, to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2022.
51.
ASTM E2573-19. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mounting of site-fabricated stretch systems to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2019.
52.
ASTM E2579-23. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mounting of wood products to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2023.
53.
ASTM E2599-22. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mounting of reflective insulation, radiant barrier and vinyl stretch ceiling materials for building applications to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2022.
54.
ASTM E2688-18. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mount of tapes to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2018.
55.
ASTM E2690-22. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mounting of caulks and sealants to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2022.
56.
ASTM E2988-17. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mounting of fibrous glass insulation for metal building to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2017.
57.
ASTM E3202-19. Standard practice for specimen preparation and mounting of plastic composites for use as deck boards, stair treads, guards or handrails to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2019.
58.
ASTM E3287-21. Practice for specimen preparation of fenestration profiles intended to support non-combustible in-fill materials to assess surface burning characteristics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2021.
59.
LaymonRGandhiPLiuX.Combustibility of interior finish and building materials using small-scale, steiner tunnel, and room-corner tests. In: Proceedings of fire and materials, San Francisco, CA, 29–31 January 2007, pp. 141–153. London: Interscience Communications.
60.
ASTM D3806-19. Standard test method of small-scale evaluation of fire-retardant paints (2 foot tunnel method). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2019.
61.
ASTM E162-22. Standard test method for surface flammability of materials using a radiant heat energy source. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2022.
62.
ASTM E1321-18. Standard test method for determining material ignition and flame spread properties. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2018.
63.
ASTM E662-21ae1. Standard test method for specific optical density of smoke generated by solid materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2021.
64.
ASTM E1354-22c. Standard test method for heat and visible smoke release rates for materials and products using an oxygen consumption calorimeter. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2022.
65.
LaymonRBorgersonJLGhandhiPD, et al. Use of bench-scale test methods to predict the fire growth of large-scale room corner tests for building materials. In: Proceedings of fire and materials, San Francisco, CA, 26–28 January 2009, pp. 141–153. London: Interscience Communications.
66.
TerreiLAcemZLardetP, et al. Study of wood self-extinguishment with a double sliding cone calorimeter. Fire Saf J2021; 122: 103316.
67.
BartlettAIHaddenRMBisbyLA.A review of factors affecting the burning behaviour of wood for application to timber construction. Fire Technol2019; 55: 1–49.
ISO 5659-2:2017. Plastics—smoke generation—part 2: determination of optical density by a single-chamber test. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2017.
70.
DiDomizioMJ.On the potential use of small scale fire tests for screening steiner tunnel results for spray foam insulation. Master’s Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2013.
71.
MorganAB. Data on rigid isocyanurate foams with class A ratings tested by cone calorimeter (Unpublished data, 2013.).
72.
ParkerW.An investigation of the fire environment in the ASTM E-84 tunnel test (National Bureau of Standards technical note 945). Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards, 1977.
73.
BabrauskasVPeacockRD.Heat release rate: the single most important variable in fire hazard. Fire Saf J1992; 18: 255–272.
74.
BabrauskasV.Specimen heat fluxes for bench-scale heat release rate testing. Fire Mater1995; 19: 243–252.
75.
CostaLCaminoGBertelliG, et al. Mechanistic study of the combustion behavior of polymeric materials in bench-scale tests. I. Comparison between cone calorimeter and traditional tests. Fire Mater1995; 19: 133–142.
76.
PetrellaRV.The assessment of full-scale fire hazards from cone calorimeter data. J Fire Sci1994; 12: 14–43.
77.
SchartelBHullTR.Development of fire—retarded materials—interpretation of cone calorimeter data. Fire Mater2007; 31: 327–354.
