The combustion characteristics of charring wood have been studied experimentally in a well-ventilated environment of a smoke chamber. A numerical simulation has also been performed for a limited case, with the Fire Dynamics Simulator, to estimate the burning environment. A horizontally placed specimen (ponderosa pine) with a moisture content of 0% or 20% is exposed to a radiant flux (25 kW/m2), with or without flaming ignition. Simultaneous measurements of the specimen’s in-depth temperature and the mass loss determine the charring front (rate) at 300 °C and the gasification rate, respectively. These condensed-phase conditions relate directly to real-time variations of gas-phase quantities: the specific optical density of smoke and the concentrations of toxic gases measured by a Fourier transform infrared gas analyzer. In-depth temperature trends are similar whether the flame exists, whereas the smoke and toxicants’ concentrations are substantially different. After the charring front moves through the specimen, the oxidative pyrolysis continues under the irradiation at high temperatures (up to ∼550 °C). Carbon monoxide and acrolein are produced continuously throughout the test, and the results indicate strong correlations. Although char formation of wood is favorable for fire safety, consequent incomplete combustion produces smoke and toxicants.
ReinhardtTE. Monitoring firefighter exposure to air toxins at prescribed burns of forest and range biomass. Research paper PNW-RP-441, October 1991. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
2.
ReinhardtTEOttmarRDHallettMJ. Guide to monitoring smoke exposure of wildland firefighters. Report no. PNW-GTR-448, March 1999. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
3.
ReinhardtTEOttmarRD.Baseline measurements of smoke exposure among wildland firefighters. J Occup Environ Hyg2004; 1: 593–606.
4.
Forest Products Laboratory. The encyclopedia of wood. rev. ed. New York: Sterling Publishing Company, Inc., 1989.
5.
CholinJM. Wood and wood-based products. In: CoteAEGrantCCHallJRJr, et al. (eds) Fire protection handbook. 20th ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 2008, pp. 61–74.
6.
FalkRH.Wood as a sustainable building material. General technical report, report no. FPL-GTR-190, April 2010. Madison, WI: US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory (also published In: Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. Centennial ed.).
7.
GerardRBarberDWolskiA. Fire safety challenges of tall wood buildings. Final report, Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, December 2013.
8.
WhiteRHDietenbergerMA. Fire safety of wood construction. General technical report, report no. FPL-GTR-190, April 2010. Madison, WI: US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory (also published In: Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. Centennial ed.).
9.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 92:2018. Standard for smoke control systems.
10.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 13943:2017. Fire safety—vocabulary (3rd ed.).
11.
AlarieY.Toxicity of fire smoke. Crit Rev Toxicol2002; 32: 259–289.
12.
WichmanIS.Material flammability, combustion, toxicity and fire hazard in transportation. Prog Energ Combust2003; 29: 247–299.
13.
HullTR.Bench-scale generation of fire effluents. In: HullTRStecAA (eds) Fire toxicity. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2010, pp. 424–460.
14.
LowdenLAHullTR.Flammability behaviour of wood and a review of the methods for its reduction. Fire Sci Rev2013; 2: 4.
15.
AdetonaOReinhardtTEDomitrovichJ, et al. Review of the health effects of wildland fire smoke on wildland firefighters and the public. Inhal Toxicol2016; 28: 95–139.
16.
BartlettAIHaddenRMBisbyLA.A review of factors affecting the burning behaviour of wood for application to tall timber construction. Fire Technol2019; 55: 1–49.
17.
MikkolaEWichmanIS.On the thermal ignition of combustible materials. Fire Mater1989; 14: 87–96.
18.
AtreyaAWichmanIS.Heat and mass transfer during piloted ignition of cellulosic solids. J Heat Trans: T ASME1989; 111: 719–725.
19.
SpearpointMJQuintiereJG.Predicting the piloted ignition of wood in the cone calorimeter using an integral model—effect of species, grain orientation and heat flux. Fire Safety J2001; 36: 391–415.
20.
BabrauskasV.Ignition handbook. Issaquah, WA: Fire Science Publishers, 2003.
21.
KhanMMDe RisJLOgdenSD. Effect of moisture on ignition time of cellulosic materials. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on fire safety science (ed KarlssonB), Karlsruhe, 21–26 September 2008, pp. 167–178. London: International Association for Fire Safety Science.
22.
ShiLChewMYL. Influence of moisture on autoignition of woods in cone calorimeter. J Fire Sci2012; 30: 158–169.
23.
AnandCShotorbanBMahalingamS, et al. Physics-based modeling of live wildland fuel ignition experiments in the forced ignition and flame spread test apparatus. Combust Sci Technol2017; 189: 1551–1570.
24.
ButlerCP. Notes on charring rates in wood. Report for the Department of the Environment and Fire Offices Committee Joint Fire Research Organization, Fire research note no. 896, November 1971. London: OUP.
25.
MikkolaE. Charring of wood based materials. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on fire safety science (ed CoxGLangfordB), Edinburgh, 8–12 July 1991, pp. 547–556. London: International Association for Fire Safety Science.
26.
WhiteRHNordheimEV.Charring rate of wood for ASTM E 119 exposure. Fire Technol1992; 28: 5–30.
27.
WhiteRHTranHC. Charring rate of wood exposed to a constant heat flux. In: Wood and fire safety—proceedings of the 3rd international scientific conference, High Tatras, 6–9 May 1996, pp. 175–183. Zvolen: Faculty of Wood Technology, Technical University of Zvolen.
28.
BrendenJJ. Measurements of heat release rates on wood products and an assembly. USDA forest research paper, report no. FPL 281, 1977. Madison, WI: US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
29.
WhiteRH. Fire performance of hardwood species. In: Proceedings of the XXI IUFRO world congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 7–12 August 2000, pp. 1–13.
30.
MoghtaderiBFletcherDF. Flaming combustion characteristics of wood-based materials. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Oceania symposium on fire science and technology, Singapore, 10–12 June 1998, pp. 209–220. London: International Association for Fire Safety Science.
31.
BabrauskasVHarrisRHJrBraunE, et al. The role of bench-scale test data in assessing real-scale fire toxicity (NIST technical note 1284). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 1991.
32.
BabrauskasVLevinBCGannRG, et al. Toxic potency measurement for fire hazard analysis (NIST special publication 827). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 1991.
33.
BabrauskasV.The generation of CO in bench-scale fire tests and the prediction for real-scale fires. Fire Mater1995; 19: 205–213.
34.
PurserDA.The evolution of toxic effluents in fires and the assessment of toxic hazard. Toxicol Lett1992; 64–65: 247–255.
35.
Bolstad-JohnsonDMBurgessJLCrutchfieldCD, et al. Characterization of firefighter exposures during fire overhaul. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J2000; 61: 636–641.
36.
WeissDCMillerJT.A study on chemicals found in the overhaul phase of structure fires using advanced portable air monitoring available for chemical speciation. Tualatin, OR: Governor’s Fire Service Policy Council and Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, 2011.
37.
TakahashiFGreenbergPSHunterGW.Firefighter particulate and gas sensor technology. FS—World Magazine, Fall 2014 edition, 2014, pp. 32–38.
38.
NaeherLPBrauerMLipsettM, et al. Woodsmoke health effects: a review. Inhal Toxicol2007; 19: 67–106.
39.
GannRG.Fire effluent, people, and standards: standardization philosophy for the effects of fire effluent on human tenability. In: BabrauskasVGannRGGraysonSJ (eds) Hazards of combustion products: toxicity, opacity, corrosivity and heat release. London: Interscience Communications, 2008.
40.
PurserDA. Assessment of hazards to occupants from smoke, toxic gases, and heat. In: DinennoPJ (ed.) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering. 4th ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 2008, pp. 96–193.
41.
DietenbergerMABoardmanCRWeiseDR. New methods for pyrolysis and combustion properties of forest litter: enhanced cone calorimetry with longleaf pine needles. In: Proceedings of the fire continuum conference, Missoula, MT, 21–24 May 2018, pp. 72–83. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
42.
HullTRStecAA.Introduction to fire toxicity. In: HullTRStecAA (eds) Fire toxicity. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2010, pp. 3–25.
43.
PurserDA.Hazards from smoke and irritants. In: HullTRStecAA (eds) Fire toxicity. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2010, pp. 51–117.
44.
Anon. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. DHHS (NIOSH) publication no. 2005-149, September2007. Washington, DC: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
45.
BlomqvistPSomonson-McNameeM.Large-scale generation and characterization of fire effluents. In: HullTRStecAA (eds) Fire toxicity. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2010, pp. 461–514.
46.
MarquisDGuillaumeELesenechalD.Accuracy (trueness and precision) of cone calorimeter tests with and without a vitiated air enclosure. Procedia Engineer2013; 62: 103–119.
47.
MatsuyamaYTakahashiF. Characterization of toxic gases and particulates in wood smoke using a standard chamber. In: Proceedings of the 9th international seminar on fire and explosion hazards, St. Petersburg, 21–26 April 2019, pp. 1165–1175. Russia: Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University.
48.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Fire dynamics simulator (FDS) and Smokeview (FDS 6.7.5, SMV 6.7.15). Free and Open-source software provided by NIST, https://pages.nist.gov/fds-smv/downloads.html
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 5659-2:2017. Plastics—smoke generation—part 2: determination of optical density by a single-chamber test.
51.
BergmanR. Chapter 13. Drying and control of moisture content and dimensional changes. In: Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. Centennial ed. Madison, WI: US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, April2010, pp. 13-1–13-19.
FahrniRSchmidJKlippelM, et al. Correct temperature measurements in fire exposed wood. In: Proceedings of the 2018 world conference on timber engineering, Seoul, South Korea, 20–23 August 2018.
54.
TerreiLAcemZMarchettiV, et al. In-depth wood temperature measurement using embedded thin wire thermocouples in cone calorimeter tests. Int J Therm Sci2021; 162: 106686.
55.
FardellPGuillaumeE.Sampling and measurement of toxic fire effluent. In: HullTRStecAA (eds) Fire toxicity. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 2010, pp. 385–423.
56.
SpeitelLC. Fourier Transform infrared analysis of combustion gases. Final report, report no. DOT/FAA/AR-01/88, October2001. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
57.
HakkarainenTMikkolaELaperreJ, et al. Smoke gas analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy—summary of the SAFIR project results. Fire Mater2000; 24: 101–112.
58.
TerreiLAcemZGeorgesV, et al. Experimental tools applied to the ignition study of spruce wood under cone calorimeter. Fire Safety J2019; 108: 102845.
59.
BoonmeeNQuintiereJG.Glowing ignition of wood: the onset of surface combustion. P Combust Inst2005; 30: 2303–2310.
60.
BabrauskasV. Ignition of wood: a review of the state of the art. In: Proceedings of the 9th international fire science and engineering conference (Interflam’2001), Edinburgh, 17–19 September 2001, pp. 71–88. London: Interscience Communications Ltd.
61.
SchartelBHullTR.Development of fire-retarded materials—interpretation of cone calorimeter data. Fire Mater2007; 31: 327–354.
62.
LyonRE.Ignition resistance of plastics. In: LewinM (ed.) Recent advances in flame retardancy of polymers, vol. 13. Norwalk, CT: Business Communications Company, Inc., 2002, pp. 14–25.
63.
GannRFriedmanR.Principles of fire behavior and combustion. 4th ed.Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2016, p. 184.
64.
HvenegaardS.Health impact of smoke exposure in wildland-urban interface fires: a literature review. Hinton, AB, Canada: FPInnovations, 2012.
65.
AndrewsGEBellMTangL, et al. Aircraft blanket ignition and toxic emission in simulated aircraft cabin fires using the cone calorimeter. Fire Mater2015; 2015: 734–748.
