This study investigated the effect of intumescent mats (M1 and M2) with different compositions on the post-fire performance of carbon fibre reinforced composites. The sandwich structure was designed for composites where M1 (carbon fibre reinforced composite-M1) or M2 (carbon fibre reinforced composite-M2) mats were covered on the composite surface. A significant reduction in the peak heat release rate and total heat release was observed from the cone calorimetric data, and carbon fibre reinforced composite-M1 showed the lowest value of 148 kW/m2 and 29 MJ/m2 for peak heat release rate and total heat release, respectively. In addition, a minor influence on mechanical properties was observed due to the variation of composite thickness and resin volume in the composite. The post-fire properties of composite were characterised, and the M1 mat presented better retention of flexural strength and modulus. The feasibility of two-layer model was confirmed to predict the post-fire performance of composites and reduce the reliance on the large amounts of empirical data.
MorganA.Flame retardant fiber-reinforced composites. In: Selcen KilincF (ed) Handbook of fire resistant textiles. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013, pp. 623–652.
3.
MangalgiriP.Composite materials for aerospace applications. Bull Mater Sci1999; 22: 657–664.
4.
RanaSFangueiroR.Advanced composite materials for aerospace engineering: processing, properties and applications. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2016.
5.
KiliarisPPapaspyridesCD.Chapter 1 – Polymers on fire. In: KiliarisPPapaspyridesCD (eds) Polymer green flame retardants. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, pp. 1–43.
6.
WaltersRNLyonRE.Flammability of polymer composites. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Research and Development, Federal Aviation Administration, 2008.
7.
LuS-YHamertonI.Recent developments in the chemistry of halogen-free flame retardant polymers. Prog Polym Sci2002; 27: 1661–1712.
8.
LaoutidFBonnaudLAlexandreMet al. New prospects in flame retardant polymer materials: from fundamentals to nanocomposites. Mat Sci Eng R2009; 63: 100–125.
9.
RakotomalalaMWagnerSDöringM.Recent developments in halogen free flame retardants for epoxy resins for electrical and electronic applications. Materials2010; 3: 4300–4327.
10.
ShawS.Halogenated flame retardants: do the fire safety benefits justify the risks?Rev Environ Health2010; 25: 261–306.
11.
PapachlimitzouABarberJLLosadaSet al. A review of the analysis of novel brominated flame retardants. J Chromatogr A2012; 1219: 15–28.
12.
BabrauskasVFuocoRBlumA.Chapter 3 – Flame retardant additives in polymers: when do the fire safety benefits outweigh the toxicity risks? In: PapaspyridesCKiliarisP (eds) Polymer green flame retardants. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, pp. 87–118.
13.
RothonRHornsbyP.Chapter 9 – Fire retardant fillers for polymers. In: KiliarisPPapaspyridesCD (eds) Polymer green flame retardants. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014, pp. 289–321.
14.
SuchitraMRenukappaN.The thermal properties of glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites with and without fillers. Macromol Symp2016; 361: 117–122.
15.
WeilED.Fire-protective and flame-retardant coatings – a state-of-the-art review. J Fire Sci2011; 29: 259–296.
16.
AlongiJHanZBourbigotS.Intumescence: tradition versus novelty. A comprehensive review. Prog Polym Sci2015; 51: 28–73.
17.
FeihSMouritzAMathysZet al. Fire structural modeling of polymer composites with passive thermal barrier. J Fire Sci2010; 28: 141–160.
18.
KandolaBKBhattiWKandareE.A comparative study on the efficacy of varied surface coatings in fireproofing glass/epoxy composites. Polym Degrad Stabil2012; 97: 2418–2427.
19.
ShiYWangG.The novel silicon-containing epoxy/PEPA phosphate flame retardant for transparent intumescent fire resistant coating. Appl Surf Sci2016; 385: 453–463.
20.
RowenJB.Composite flame retardant and smoke suppressing surfacing mat. In: Proceedings of the SAMPE, Long Beach, CA, 12–16 May 2003.
21.
KandareEChukwunonsoAKKandolaBK.The effect of fire-retardant additives and a surface insulative fabric on fire performance and mechanical property retention of polyester composites. Fire Mater2011; 35: 143–155.
22.
MalucelliGCarosioFAlongiJet al. Materials engineering for surface-confined flame retardancy. Mat Sci Eng R2014; 84: 1–20.
23.
ZhangXWangRWangRet al. Universal evaluation of fire retardant properties of fiber mats by the optimal cone calorimeter. Text Res J2018; 88: 892–903.
24.
KandolaBKLuangtriratanaPDuquesneSet al. The effects of thermophysical properties and environmental conditions on fire performance of intumescent coatings on glass fibre-reinforced epoxy composites. Materials2015; 8: 5216–5237.
25.
LiuJZhangYPengSet al. Fire property and charring behavior of high impact polystyrene containing expandable graphite and microencapsulated red phosphorus. Polym Degrad Stabil2015; 121: 261–270.
26.
MariappanT.Recent developments of intumescent fire protection coatings for structural steel: a review. J Fire Sci2016; 34: 120–163.
27.
MouritzA.Post-fire flexural properties of fibre-reinforced polyester, epoxy and phenolic composites. J Mater Sci2002; 37: 1377–1386.
KandareEChukwudolueCKandolaBK.The use of fire-retardant intumescent mats for fire and heat protection of glass fibre-reinforced polyester composites: thermal barrier properties. Fire Mater2010; 34: 21–38.
32.
AbdouAABudaiwiIM.Comparison of thermal conductivity measurements of building insulation materials under various operating temperatures. J Build Phys2005; 29: 171–184.
33.
OthmanAM.Experimental Investigations of the effect of some insulating materials on the compressive strength, water absorption and thermal conductivity of building bricks. Jordan J Mech Indus Eng2010; 4: 443–450.
34.
PapadopoulosAM.State of the art in thermal insulation materials and aims for future developments. Energ Buildings2005; 37: 77–86.
35.
GibsonAWrightPWuY-Set al. Modelling residual mechanical properties of polymer composites after fire. Plast Rubber Compos2003; 32: 81–90.
