A comparative study on the suppression efficiency of different water mist additives was conducted in a counter-flow flame apparatus. The introduction of 1 mL/min ultrapure water mist reduced the critical stretch rate by 14%. The chemical additives could improve the suppression efficiency of water mist except FeSO4 and H3PO4. Their suppression efficiency could be generally sorted in a descending order: organic alkali metal salts (K2C2O4, C2H3KO2), inorganic alkali metal salts (KCl, KHCO3, K3PO4), phosphorus-containing compounds (K3PO4, NH4H2PO4, H3PO4), and inorganic ferrous compounds (FeCl2, FeSO4). The morphology of the particles deviated from the previous sphere shape assumptions. It is assumed that the efficiency of chemical additives in suppressing highly stretched diffusion can depend on the following factors: (1) the chemical nature of the additives, (2) the residence time controlled by the flow conditions, and (3) the residual particles formed by the additive-containing water mist.
MawhinneyJRDlugogorskiBZKIMAK (eds). A closer look at the fire extinguishing properties of water mist. In: 4th international symposium on fire safety science, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 13–17 July 1994.
2.
NdubizuCAnanthRTatemP. On water mist fire suppression mechanisms in a gaseous diffusion flame. Fire Safety J1998; 31(3): 253–276.
3.
LiuZKimAK. A review of water mist fire suppression systems—fundamental studies. J Fire Prot Eng1999; 10(3): 32–50.
4.
LeFortGMarshallAWPabonM. Evaluation of surfactant enhanced water mist performance. Fire Technol2009; 45(3): 341–354.
5.
LanMLiYWangX. Drop impact onto charring surface of heated Betula costata wood. CIESC J2013; 8: 16.
6.
YangLZhaoJ. Fire extinct experiments with water mist by adding additives. J Therm Sci2011; 20(6): 563–569.
7.
JosephPNicholsENovozhilovV. A comparative study of the effects of chemical additives on the suppression efficiency of water mist. Fire Safety J2013; 58: 221–225.
8.
BirchallJD. On the mechanism of flame inhibition by alkali metal salts. Combust Flame1970; 14(1): 85–95.
9.
ThomasG. The quenching of laminar methane-air flames by water mists. Combust Flame2002; 130(1): 147–160.
10.
CaoXRenJZhouY. Suppression of methane/air explosion by ultrafine water mist containing sodium chloride additive. J Hazard Mater2015; 285: 311–318.
11.
KuangKChowWNiX. Fire suppressing performance of superfine potassium bicarbonate powder. Fire Mater2011; 35(6): 353–366.
12.
LinterisGKattaVTakahashiF. Experimental and numerical evaluation of metallic compounds for suppressing cup-burner flames. Combust Flame2004; 138(1): 78–96.
13.
LiuJCongB. Experimental evaluation of water mist with metal chloride additives for suppressing CH4/air cup-burner flames. J Therm Sci2013; 22(3): 269–274.
14.
KorobeinichevOShmakovAChernovA. Fire suppression by aerosols of aqueous solutions of salts. Combust Explo Shock+2010; 46(1): 16–20.
15.
JayaweeraTFisherEFlemingJW. Flame suppression by aerosols derived from aqueous solutions containing phosphorus. Combust Flame2005; 141(3): 308–321.
16.
KorobeinichevOShmakovAShvartsbergV. Fire suppression by low-volatile chemically active fire suppressants using aerosol technology. Fire Safety J2012; 51: 102–109.
17.
MacDonaldMAJayaweeraTFisherEM. Inhibition of nonpremixed flames by phosphorus-containing compounds. Combust Flame1999; 116(1): 166–176.
RummingerMDLinterisGT. Inhibition of premixed carbon monoxide–hydrogen–oxygen–nitrogen flames by iron pentacarbonyl. Combust Flame2000; 120(4): 451–464.
20.
FriedmanRLevyJB. Inhibition of opposed jet methane-air diffusion flames. The effects of alkali metal vapours and organic halides. Combust Flame1963; 7: 195–201.
21.
TwarowskiA. Photometric determination of the rate of H2O formation from H and OH in the presence of phosphine combustion products. Combust Flame1993; 94(4): 341–348.
22.
ModakAUAbbud-MadridADelplanqueJ-P. The effect of mono-dispersed water mist on the suppression of laminar premixed hydrogen–, methane–, and propane–air flames. Combust Flame2006; 144(1): 103–111.
23.
LazzariniAKraussRChelliahH. Extinction conditions of non-premixed flames with fine droplets of water and water/NaOH solutions. P Combust Inst2000; 28(2): 2939–2945.
24.
ZhengRBrayKRoggB. Short communication. Combust Sci Technol1997; 126(1–6): 389–401.
25.
WanigarathnePKraussRChelliahH (eds). Fire suppression by particulates containing metallic compounds. In: Halon options technical working conference (HOTWC), Albuquerque, NM, 2–4 May 2000.
26.
TsujiHYamaokaI. The counterflow diffusion flame in the forward stagnation region of a porous cylinder. Symp Combust Proc1967; 11(1): 979–984.
27.
YoshidaATakasakiRKashiwaK. Extinguishment of counterflow methane/air diffusion flame by polydisperse fine water droplets. Combust Flame2013; 160(8): 1357–1363.
28.
YangJCDonnellyMKPriveNC. An apparatus for screening fire suppression efficiency of dispersed liquid agents. Fire Safety J2001; 36(1): 55–72.
29.
ChelliahHKLazzariniAWanigarathneP. Inhibition of premixed and non-premixed flames with fine droplets of water and solutions. P Combust Inst2002; 29(1): 369–376.
30.
ZegersEWilliamsBSheinsonR. Dynamics and suppression effectiveness of monodisperse water droplets in non-premixed counterflow flames. P Combust Inst2000; 28(2): 2931–2937.
31.
ChelliahH. Flame inhibition/suppression by water mist: droplet size/surface area, flame structure, and flow residence time effects. P Combust Inst2007; 31(2): 2711–2719.
32.
NaitoHUendoTSasoY. Effect of fine water droplets on extinguishment of diffusion flame stabilized in the forward stagnation region of a porous cylinder. P Combust Inst2011; 33(2): 2563–2571.
33.
RolonJC. Etude théorique et expérimentale de la flamme de diffusion à contre-courant. Châtenay-Malabry: Ecole Centrale Paris, 1988.
34.
WangXZhuPLiY. Effect of low ambient air pressure on spray characteristics of water mist. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2015; 66: 7–12.
35.
Du PlessisMWangRKahawitaR. Investigation of the near-region of a square jet. J Fluid Eng: T ASME1974; 96(3): 246–251.
36.
ShanbhogueSJHusainSLieuwenT. Lean blowoff of bluff body stabilized flames: scaling and dynamics. Prog Energ Combust2009; 35(1): 98–120.
