A simple and effective laboratory test methodology was developed for differentiating wildland fire chemicals based on the ignition time of vegetative fuel samples. The test apparatus consisted of an electric-powered radiant heater that was used to produce a uniform radiant thermal load to ignite the vegetative fuel samples. The samples, treated with wildland fire chemicals, were mounted on to a load cell to determine the transient mass loss during the combustion process. A custom-built heat flux sensor, that was modified and tested to reduce high errors, was used to determine the time to flaming ignition. The time to flaming ignition was also measured using transient mass loss data of the vegetative fuel samples. Statistical t-test analysis was conducted on the time to flaming ignition to determine whether the results were statistically significant for the different chemical treatments. The results indicated that the test methodology allowed for effective differentiation between the wildland fire chemical treatments by comparing their mean ignition times. The narrow standard deviations of the average ignition times suggested that the test methodology was able to produce repeatable results.
FrankmanDWebbBWButlerBW. Measurements of convective and radiative heating in wildland fires. Int J Wildland Fire2013; 22: 157–167.
2.
ByramGM. Combustion of forest fuels. In: DavisKP (ed.) Forest fire: control and use. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959, pp. 61–89.
3.
SalazarLABradshawLS. Display and interpretation of fire behavior probabilities for long-term planning. Environ Manage1986; 10: 393–402.
4.
HirschKGMartellDL. A review of initial attack fire crew productivity and effectiveness. Int J Wildland Fire1996; 6: 199–215.
5.
WeberRO. Wildland fire spread models. In: JohnsonEAMiyanishiK (eds) Forest fires: behavior and ecological effects. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2001, pp. 151–169.
6.
KeeleyJE. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review. Int J Wildland Fire2009; 18: 116–126.
7.
KiddCTNelsonCG. How the Schmidt-Boelter gage really works. In: Proceedings of 41st international instrumentation symposium, Instrument Society of America Research Triangle Park, NC, 7–11 May 1995, pp. 347–368.
8.
GardonR. An instrument for the direct measurement of intense thermal radiation. Rev Sci Instrum1953; 24: 366–370.
9.
DillerTE. Advances in heat flux measurements. In: Hartnett JP and Irvine TF (eds) Advances in heat transfer, vol. 23. Boston, MA: Academic Press, 1993, pp. 279–368.
10.
RobbinsAPCollierPC. Heat flux measurements: experiments and modelling. BRANZ study report 206, 2009. Judgeford, New Zealand: BRANZ Ltd.
11.
KeltnerNRBeckJVNakosJT. Using directional flame thermometers for measuring thermal exposure. J ASTM Int2010; 7(2): 27–43.
12.
LamCWeckmanE. Steady-state heat flux measurements in radiative and mixed radiative-convective environments. Fire Mater2009; 33(7): 303–321.
13.
SamuelMLSeul-HyunPThomasCG. Development of rapidly deployable instrumentation packages for data acquisition in wildland–urban interface (WUI) fires. Fire Safety J2010; 45(5): 327–336.
14.
SullivanEMcDonaldA. Mathematical model and sensor development for measuring energy transfer from wildland fires. Int J Wildland Fire2014; 23: 995–1004.
15.
KalabokidisKD. Effects of wildfire suppression chemicals on people and the environment—a review. Global Nest: Int J2000; 2: 129–137.
16.
LiodakisSAntonopoulosIKakardakisT. Evaluating the use of minerals as forest fire retardants. Fire Safety J2010; 45: 98–105.
17.
LiodakisSBakirtzisDDimitrakopoulosAP. Auto ignition and thermogravimetric analysis of forest species treated with fire retardants. Thermochim Acta2003; 399: 31–42.
18.
LyonsJW. The chemistry and uses of fire retardants. Malabar, FL: RE Krieger Publishing Company, 1987.
19.
PappaAATzamtzisNEStatheropoulosMK. A comparative study of the effects of fire retardants on the pyrolysis of cellulose and Pinus halepensis pine-needles. J Anal Appl Pyrol1995; 31: 85–100.
20.
PouwelsADEijkelGBBoonJJ. Curie-point pyrolysis–capillary gas chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry of micro crystalline cellulose. J Anal Appl Pyrol1989; 14: 237–280.
21.
WangQLiJWinandyE. Chemical mechanism of fire retardance of boric acid on wood. Wood Sci Technol2004; 38: 375–389.
22.
ASTM E1321-13. Standard test method for determining material ignition and flame spread properties. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013.
23.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Wildland Fire Chemical Systems. Standard test procedure, section 2: fire tests, STP 2.1–2.2, http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/fire/wfcs/tests/index.htm
24.
TafreshiAMDi MarzoM. Foams and gels as fire protection agents. Fire Safety J1999; 33: 295–305.
25.
DietenbergerMAShalbafanAWellingJ. Treated and untreated foam core particleboards with intumescent veneer: comparative analysis using a cone calorimeter. J Therm Anal Calorim2013; 114: 979–987.
26.
ShenDKFangMXChowWK. Ignition of wood-based materials by thermal radiation. Int J Eng Perform Based Fire Code2006; 8(2): 69–83.
27.
McAllisterSGrenfellLHadlowA. Piloted ignition of live forest fuels. Fire Safety J2012; 51: 133–142.
28.
National Fire Protection Association. NFPA 2113: standard on selection, care, use, and maintenance of flame-resistant garments for protection of industrial personnel against flash fire, National Fire Protection Association 2015.
29.
AyrilmisNCandanZWhiteR. Physical, mechanical, and fire properties of oriented strandboard with fire retardant treated veneers. Holz Als Roh-Und Werkst2007; 65: 449–458.
30.
ISO 5660-1:1993. Fire tests—reaction to fire. Part 1—rate of heat release for building products (cone calorimeter method).
31.
ASTM E1354-02. Standard test method for heat and visible smoke release rates for materials and products using an oxygen consumption calorimeter. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2002.
32.
GrexaOLubkeH. Flammability parameters of wood tested on a cone calorimeter. Polym Degrad Stabil2001; 74: 427–432.
33.
SullivanE. Measuring energy transfer from wildland forest fires. MSc Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2014, pp. 1–2, 15–26, 62–65.
34.
TaylorJR. An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements. 2nd ed.Sausalito, CA: University Science Books, 1996, pp. 13, 60–66.
35.
PowellRHallWHyinkC. Thermocouple reference tables based on the IPTS-68. Stamford, CT: Omega Press1975, p. 350.
36.
SilvaniXMorandiniF. Fire spread experiments in the field: temperature and heat fluxes measurements. Fire Safety J2009; 44(2): 279–285.
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Specification for fire suppressant foam (class A. foam) for wildland firefighting. Specification 5100-307a, 2010, http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/fire/wfcs/documents/307a.pdf
ASTM D4442-07. Standard test methods for direct moisture content measurement of wood and wood-based materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2007.
41.
PowelRWHoCYLileyPE. “Thermal conductivity of selected materials,” National standard reference data series—National Bureau of Standards—8 (Category 5—thermodynamic and transport properties), 25November1966, http://www.nist.gov/data/nsrds/NSRDS-NBS-8.pdf
42.
McDonaldAMoreauCChandraS. Use of thermal emission signals to characterize the impact of fully and partially molten plasma-sprayed zirconia particles on glass surfaces. Surf Coat Tech2010; 204: 2323–2330.
43.
MontgomeryDC. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed.AZ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey, 2013, pp. 36–38, 686.
