The impacts of elevation on pool fire behavior in a closed compartment were investigated based upon a distinctive stratification phenomenon. The parameters including the mass loss rate, the combustion efficiency, and the heat release rate were measured. The results indicated that the mass loss rate maintained a steady stage for fires whose flame did not impinge the ceiling. The boiling burning occurred soon after the ignition, the mass loss rate increased sharply and the value was much larger than that in the open space if the flame impinged the ceiling. The combustion efficiency and carbon conversion ratio tended to be smaller if the fire was elevated higher. The combustion efficiency of fires whose flame impinged the ceiling was much smaller than that of fires whose flame did not impinge the ceiling. From the perspective of the heat release rate, elevated fires whose flame impinged the ceiling were more hazardous at the early stage.
TakedaH. Model experiments of ship fire. P Combust Inst1989; 22(1): 1311–1317.
2.
StewardFMorrisonLMehaffeyJ. Full scale fire tests for ship accommodation quarters. Fire Technol1992; 28(1): 31–47.
3.
NikitinYV. Self-extinction of fire in a closed compartment. J Fire Sci1999; 17(2): 97–102.
4.
NikitinYV. Indirect method of estimating a fire pool area in a closed compartment. J Fire Sci1999; 17(1): 57–70.
5.
ChowWKZouGW. Numerical studies on closed chamber fires. Nav Eng J2009; 121(2): 79–89.
6.
LiC. Experimental study on pool fire behaviors in closed compartment on ship. PhD Thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, China, 2010.
7.
ZukoskiE. Development of a stratified ceiling layer in the early stages of a closed room fire. Fire Mater1978; 2(2): 54–62.
8.
SugawaOKawagoeKOkaY. Burning behavior in a poorly-ventilated compartment fire-ghosting fire. Fire Sci Tech1989; 9(2): 5–14.
9.
LiCLuSYuanM. Studies on ghosting fire from pool fire in closed compartments. J China Univ Sci Tech2010; 40(7): 751–756.
10.
BackovskyJFooteKAlvaresNJ. Temperature profiles in forced-ventilation enclosure fires. In: WakamatsuTHasemiYSekizawaASeegerPGPagniPJGrantCE (eds) Fire safety science. Tokyo, Japan: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1989, pp. 315–324.
11.
MounaudL. A parametric study if the effect of fire source elevation in a compartment. Master Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA, 2004.
12.
YouHFaethG. Ceiling heat transfer during fire plume and fire impingement. Fire Mater1979; 3(3): 140–147.
13.
BabrauskasV. Flame lengths under ceilings. Fire Mater1980; 4(3): 119–126.
14.
YouHZ. An investigation of fire plume impingement on a horizontal ceiling. 1—plume region. Fire Mater1984; 8(1): 28–39.
15.
YouHZ. An investigation of fire-plume impingement on a horizontal ceiling. 2—impingement and ceiling-jet regions. Fire Mater1985; 9(1): 46–56.
16.
GrossD. Measurement of flame lengths under ceilings. Fire Safety J1989; 15(1): 31–44.
17.
ThomasPKarlssonB. On the length of flames under ceilings. J Fire Sci1991; 9(6): 527–537.
18.
BaukalCGebhartB. A review of flame impingement heat transfer studies. Part 1: experimental conditions. Combust Sci Technol1995; 104(4–6): 339–357.
19.
BaukalCGebhartB. A review of flame impingement heat transfer studies. Part 2: measurements. Combust Sci Technol1995; 104(4–6): 359–385.
20.
WengWHasemiY. Heat transfer to an unconfined ceiling from an impinging buoyant diffusion flame. Heat Mass Transfer2006; 42(7): 652–659.
21.
UtiskulYQuintiereJGRangwalaAS. Compartment fire phenomena under limited ventilation. Fire Safety J2005; 40(4): 367–390.
22.
KarlssonBQuintiereJG. Enclosure fire dynamics. New York: CRC Press, 2002.
23.
QuintiereJG. Fire behavior in building compartments. P Combust Inst2002; 29(1): 181–193.
24.
BabrauskasVWickströmUG. Thermoplastic pool compartment fires. Combust Flame1979; 34: 195–202.
25.
TewarsonA. Heat release rate in fires. Fire Mater1980; 4(4): 185–191.
26.
BabrauskasVPeacockRD. Heat release rate: the single most important variable in fire hazard. Fire Safety J1992; 18(3): 255–272.
27.
ChowWZouG. Numerical simulation of pressure changes in closed chamber fires. Build Environ2009; 44(6): 1261–1275.
28.
PlumecocqWCoutinMMelisS. Characterization of closed-doors electrical cabinet fires in compartments. Fire Safety J2011; 46(5): 243–253
29.
KoGHHaminsABundyM. Mixture fraction analysis of combustion products in the upper layer of reduced-scale compartment fires. Combust Flame2009; 156(2): 467–476.
30.
ZhangJLuSLiQ. Smoke filling in closed compartments with elevated fire sources. Fire Safety J2012; 54: 14–23
31.
KangQSLuSXChenB. Experimental study on burning rate of small scale heptane pool fires. Chinese Sci Bull2010; 55(10): 973–979.
32.
ChenBLuSLiC. Initial fuel temperature effects on burning rate of pool fire. J Hazard Mater2011; 188(1–3): 369–374.
33.
ChenBLuSLiC. Unsteady burning of thin-layer pool fires. J Fire Sci2012; 30(1): 3–15.
34.
RangwalaAS. Mathematical modeling of low ventilation compartment fires. Master Thesis, University of Maryland, USA, 2002.
35.
UtiskulY. Theoretical and experimental study on fully-developed compartment fires. PhD Thesis, University of Maryland, USA, 2006.
36.
MizukamiTUtiskulYNaruseT. A compartment burning rate model for various scales. Fire Safety Sci2009; 9: 839–848.
37.
QuintiereJG. Fundamentals of fire phenomena. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
38.
BeylerCL. Analysis of compartment fires with overhead forced ventilation. In: CoxGLangfordB (eds) Fire safety science. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd, 1991, pp. 291–300.
39.
JanssensML. Measuring rate of heat release by oxygen consumption. Fire Technol1991; 27(3): 234–249.
40.
HuggettC. Estimation of rate of heat release by means of oxygen consumption measurements. Fire Mater1980; 4(2): 61–65.
