The Kirton Adaptation- Innovation Inventory (KAI) is designed to measure propensity to innovate versus propensity to adapt, a personality dimension claimed significant for understanding and building organizational effectiveness This article presents a series of validity checks for the KAI, reports two serendipitous findings, then tests Kirton's hypothesis that a team composed of extreme adapters or extreme innovators is less effective than a team balanced on this dimension
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashby, W.R. (1956) Introduction to cyberneticsNew YorkJohn Wiley
2.
Bagozzi, R. & Foxall, G. (1995). Construct validity and generalizability of the Kirton Adaptation -Innovation Inventory European Journal of Personality, 9 (3), 185-206.
3.
Bowman, J. (1994). At last, an alternative to performance appraisal: Total quality managementPublic Administration Review, 54 (2), 129-136
4.
Campbell, Donald (1979) Degrees of freedom and the case study In T Cook & C Reichart (Eds.), Quantitative and qualitative methods in evaluation research (pp 47-69) Beverly Hills, CASage
5.
Clapp, R.G. (1993) Stability of cognitive style in adults and some implications A longitudinal study of the Kirton Adaptatton-InnovattonInventory Psychological Reports, 73 (3), 1235-1245
6.
Filstead, W. (1979) Qualitative methods In T Cook & C Reichart (Eds.), Quantitative and qualitative methods in evaluation research (pp 33-48) Beverly Hills, CASage.
7.
Fisher, A. (1985) Leadership as medium Treating complexity in group communication research Small Group Behavior, 16 (2), 167-196
8.
Fleenor, J. & Taylor, S. (1994). Construct validity of three self-report measures of creativityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 54 (2), 464-470
9.
Foden, L. & Mason, H. (1986) What price participation? Educational and Child Psychology, 3 (3), 230-236
10.
Foxall, G. & Hackett, P. (1992) The factor structure and construct validity of the Kirton Adaptation InnovationInventory Personality and Individual Differences, 13 (9), 967-975
11.
Follett, M.P. (1918/1998) The new stateUniversity Park, PAPennsylvania State University Press .
12.
Goldsmith, R. (1989) Creative style and personality theory In M Kirton (Ed ), Adaptors and innovators (chap 2LondonRoutledge,
13.
Guion, R. (1980) On trinitarian doctrines of validityProfessional Psychology, 11, (3), 385-398
14.
Hair, J., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, R. (1987) Multivariate data analysis (2nd ed ) New YorkMacmillan Publishers .
15.
Holland, PA, Bowskill, I., Bailey, A. (1991) Adaptors and innovators Selection versus induction . Psychological Reports, 68 (3), 1283-1290
16.
Jacobson, C. (1993) Cognitive styles of creativity Relations of scores on the Kirton Adaptation- Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs type indicator among managers in the USA. Psychological Reports, 72, 1131-1138.
17.
KAI Report Back Form. (1985)
18.
Kirton, M. (1989) Adaptors and innovatorsLondonRoutledge
19.
Kirton, M. (1978) Have adaptors and innovators equal levels of creativity ? Psychological Reports, 42, 695-698.
20.
Kirton, M. (1976) Adaptors and innovators. A description and measureJournal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629
21.
Kuhn, T. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutionsChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press
22.
Messick, S. (1988) The once and future issues of validity Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement In H Wainer & H Braun (Eds ), Test validity (pp 33-45) Hillsdale, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates
23.
Miller, D. (1990) The Icarus paradoxNew YorkHarper Business
24.
Mudd, S. (1996) Kirton's A-I theory Evidence bearing on the style/level and factor composition issuesBritish Journal of Psychology , 87 (2), 241-254
25.
Murdock, M. , Isaksen, S. & Lauer, K. (1993) Creativity training and the stability and internal consistency of the Kirton Adaption-InnovationInventory Psychological Reports, 72 (3), 1123-1130
26.
Quinn, R. (1988) Beyond rational managementSan FranciscoJossey-Bass
27.
Sirgy, J. (1990) Toward a theory of social relations The regression analogBehavioral Science, 35 (3), 197-206
28.
Sterman, C. (1990) Are you the product of my misunderstanding? Or the role of sorting mechanisms and the basic human programs in the treatment of alcoholism In C Sterman (Ed.), Neuro-linguistic programming in alcoholism treatment (pp 125-140) New YorkHaworth
Thompson, T. (1991) Dialectics, communication and exercises for creativityJournal of Creative Behavior, 25 (1), 43-51
31.
Trend, M.G. (1979) On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantiative analyses In T Cook & C. Reichart (Eds ), Quantitative and qualitative methods in evaluation research (pp 68-86) Beverly Hills, CASage
32.
Tullett, A. (1997) Cognitive style Not culture's consequenceEuropean Psychologist, 2 (3), 258-267
33.
Tullett, A. & Kirton, M. (1995) Further evidence for the independence of adaptive-innovative (A-I) cognitive style from national culturePersonality and Individual Differences, 19 (3), 393-396
34.
Van der Molen, P. (1989) Adaptation-innovation and changes in social structure On the anatomy of catastrophe In M Kirton (Ed ), Adaptors and innovators (pp chap 7) LondonRoutledge
35.
Watson, W., Kuman, K. & Michaelsen, L. (1993) Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groupsAcademy of Management Journal, 36 (3), 590-602
36.
Weick, K. (1991) The vulnerable System An analysis of the Tenenfe air disaster In P Frost, L Moore, M. Louis, C Lundberg & J Martin (Eds ), Reframing organizational culture (pp 117-130) Newbury ParkSage
37.
Weick, K. (1987) Organizational culture as a source of high reliabilityCalifornia Management Review, 29 (2), 112-127
38.
Weick, K. (1979) The social psychology of organizingNew YorkRandom House
