The contracting out of routine services and some sensitive functions has grown rapidly at every level of government in the United States It not only has become a new method for human resource managers to provide needed public services, but it also poses new challenges for personnel management and for the training responsibilities of future public administrators What accounts for the growth of privatization m recent years, despite strong and persistent opposition? This article suggests that the disappearance of some revenue sources accounts for the growth Another factor is that the intellectual climate supports a shift away from public programs toward the private sector For personnel specialists privatization carries with it a risk of transition in allegiance from the public to the private sector This development leaves workers at the mercy of the marketplace and steps away from the government protection that they had once enjoyed The article recommends that privatization should be limited to only those services that the people are willing to monitor or risk in order to safeguard democratic accountability
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahlbrandt, R.S. Jr. (1974, March). Implications of contracting for a public serviceUrban Affairs Quarterly , 337-358.
2.
Asher, M. & Popkm J. (1984) The effects of gender and race differentials on public-private wage comparisons A study of postal workersIndustrial and Labor Relations Review, 38,16-25
3.
Becker, E.W., Silverstein, G., &Chaykm, L. (1995). Public employee job security and benefits A barrier to privatization of mental health servicesPublic Productivity & Management Review, 19 (1), 25-33.
4.
Brace, P. (1996). Congestion points some states to private roadsPA Times, 19 (4), 3, 20.
5.
Brotman, A. (1992). Privatization of mental health services The case of increasing policy gridlockCommunity Mental Health Journal, 29, 103-114.
6.
Butler, S. (1991). Privatization for public purposes In W. Gormley (Ed.), Privatization and its alternatives . (pp. 17-24). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
Bureau of the Budget. (1955). Bulletin55-4.
8.
Cappell, C.L. (1990). The status of black lawyersWork and Occupations, 17, 100-121.
9.
Chamerlin, J.R. &Jackson, J.E. (1987). Privatization as institutional choiceJournal of Policy Analysis and Management , 6 (4), 586-604.
10.
Chi, K. ( 1993). Privatization in state governments Options for the futureState Trends Forecast, 2 (2), 1-39.
11.
Chi, K. ( 1998). Privatization in state governmentPublic Administration Review, 58 (4), 374-375.
12.
Chandler, T. & Feuille, P. (1991). Municipal unions and privatizationPublic Administration Review, 51 (1), 15-22.
13.
Christopher, G.C. (1997). Change: A view from the cutting edgePublic Manager, 26 (3), 25-28.
14.
Cohen, S. & Eimicke, W. (1998). Tools for innovatorsSan Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
15.
Dawson, I.O. (1990). Trends and developments in the public sector In S. W Hays & R. C. Kearney (Eds.), Public personnel administration (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJPrentice Hall
16.
Denhardt, K., Raffel, J., Jacobson, E., Manlove, M., Auger, D., & Lewis, J. (1995). Employee issues in privatizationMIS Report, 27 (10), 1-12.
17.
Dilger, R.J., Moffett, R.R., & Struyk, L. (1997). Privatization of municipal services in America's largest citiesPublic Administration Review , 57 (1), 21-26.
18.
Donahue, J.D. (1989). The privatization decision Public ends, private meansNew YorkBasic Books.
19.
Florestano, P.S. (1994). State commissions on privatization. Research, recommendations, and cautions In ASPA resource paper series (pp. 1-6). Washington, D.C.American Society for Public Administration.
20.
Fixler, P.E. Jr. & Poole, R.W. Jr. (1987) Status of state and local privatization In S. H. Hanke Ed.), Prospects for privatization (pp.164-178). NY. The Academy of Political Science.
21.
Frederickson, H.G. (1990). Public administration and social equityPublic Administration Review, 50 (2), 228-237.
22.
Gore, A. (1993). The Gore report on reinventing governmentNew York. Times Books.
23.
Goodman, J.C. (1985). Introduction In J. C. Goodman (Ed.), Privatization (pp. v-xiv). Dallas, Texas : National Center for Policy Analysis.
Harris County privatization experience. (1997). An interview with Joyce Cambric, personnel director of Harris County. Houston, Texas, November 20.
26.
Hatry, H. & Valente, C.F. (1983). Alternative service delivery approaches involving the use of the private sector. Municipal year book 1983 (pp. 199-217). Washington, D.C.: International City and County Management Association.
27.
Haque, M.S. (1996). The intellectual crisis in public administration in the current epoch of privatizationAdministration & Society, 27 (4), 510-536.
28.
Hout, M. (1984). The occupational mobility of black men: 1962-1973American Sociological Review, 47, 727-739.
29.
Ingraham, P.W., Thompson, J.R. & Sanders, R.P. (1998). Transforming government Lessons from the reinvention laboratoriesSan Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
30.
Jennings, E.T. (1991). Public choice and the privatization of government. Implications for public administration In J. S. Ott, A. C. Hyde, & J. M. Shafritz (Eds.), Public Management Essential Readings (pp.113-129). Chicago: Lyceum .
31.
Kettl,D.E. (1993). Sharing power Public and private marketsWashington, D.C.: The Brookings Institute .
32.
Kettl, D.F. & Dilulio, J.J. Jr. (1995). Inside the reinvention machineWashington. D.C.. The Brookings Institute.
33.
Kobrak, P. (1995). Privatization and cozy politics In ASPA resource paper series (pp. 20-25). Washington, D.C. American Society for Public Administration.
34.
Kolderie, T. (1987, September-October). What do we mean by "privatization?"Society, 46-51.
35.
Kolderie, T. (1986). The two different concepts of privatizationPublic Administration Review, 46 (4), 285-291.
36.
Lasswell, H. (1958). Politics Who gets what, when, howNew York: Meridian Press.
37.
Linowes, D.F. (1988). Privatization. Toward a more effective government. Report of the president's commission on privatizationUrbana, IL. University of Illinois Press.
38.
Lochhead, C. (1988, May-June). Taking cities privateThe Saturday Evening Post, 30.
39.
Martin, L. (1993a). Bidding on service delivery. Public-private competitionMIS Report, 25 (11), 1-9.
40.
Martin, L. (1993b). Contracting out: A comparative analysis of local government practices In T D. Lynch & L. L. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of comparative public budgeting and financial management (pp. 225-239). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
41.
Mikesell, J.L. (1995). Fiscal administration Analysis and applications for the public sector (4th ed.) Belmont, CAWadsworth Publishing Co.
42.
Moe, R.C. (1996). Managing privatization: A new challenge to public administration In B.G. Peters & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), Agenda for excellence 2 (pp.135-148). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
43.
Moe, R.C. (1987). Exploring the limits of privatizationPublic Administration Review, 47 (6), 453-460.
44.
Morgan, D.R. & England, R.E. (1996). Managing urban America (4th ed.) Chatham, New JerseyChatham House Publishers, Inc.
45.
Moore, S. (1989). Privatization in American cities. Lessons for Washington, Part I In J. Sherrod (Ed.), Privatization A sourcebook (pp. 324-338). Omnigraphics, Inc.Detroit, Michigan.
46.
Morley, E. (1989). Patterns in the use of alternative delivery approaches. Municipal year book 1989Washington, D.C.: International City and County Management Association.
47.
Naff, K.C. (1991). Labor-management relations and privatization: A federal perspectivePublic Administration Review , 51 (1), 23-30.
48.
National Academy of Public Administration. ( 1998), Conference Resolve for Results ActPublic Objective, 4 (2), 1-2.
49.
National Commission for Employment Policy. ( 1988). Privatization and public employees The impact of city and county contracting out on government workersWashington, D.C.
50.
Office of Management and Budget. (1983, August 4). CircularA-76.
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sectorReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53.
Osborne, D. & Rivera, V.C. (1998). Reinventing government Facilitator guide and workbookSan Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
54.
Perry, J.L. & Wise, L.R. (1990). The motivational bases of public servicePublic Administration Review, 50 (3), 367-373.
55.
Popovich, M. (1998) Creating high-performance government organizationsCA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justiceCambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
57.
Reason Foundation. (1993). PrivatizationLos Angeles, CA: Reason Foundation .
58.
Sappington, D.E.M. & Stiglitz, J.E. (1987). Privatization, information and incentivesJournal of Policy Analysis and Management , 6 (4), 567-582.
59.
Savas, E.S. (1987). Privatization The key to better governmentChatham, NJ. Chatham House.
60.
Sherrod, J. (1989). Privatization A sourcebookDetroit Michigan. Omnigraphics Inc.
61.
Smith, A. (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (Eds.) [Glasgow edition, 1976]. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
62.
Smith, S.P. (1977). Equal pay in the public sector Fact or fantasy?Princeton. Princeton University, Industrial Relations Section.
63.
Starr, P. (1987). Limits of privatization In Hanke, S.H. (Ed.), Prospects for privatization (pp.125-137). NY: The Academy of Political Science.
64.
Sullivan, H.J. (1987). Privatization of public services. A growing threat to constitutional rightsPublic Administration Review , 47 (6), 461-467.
65.
Wallin, B.A. (1997). The need for privatization process: Lessons from development and implementation, Public Administration Review, 57 (1), 11-20.
66.
Williams, R.L. (1998). Economic theory and contracting out for residential waste collection: How "satisfying" is it?Public Productivity & Management Review, 21 (3), 259-271.
67.
Wise, L.R. (1990). Social equity in civil service systemsPublic Administration Review, 50 (5), 567-575.
68.
Zajac, G. & Al-Kazemi, A. (1997). Reinventing government and redefining leadership: Implications for personnel management in governmentPublic Productivity & Management Review, 20 (4), 372-383.
