Reinventing government is a cross-national movement that has important, and potentially negative, implications for the career civil service. This article examines the global development of the reinventing government movement, arguing that it represents at least in part an attack on bureaucratic power and the career public service Each of its principal themes—including debureaucratization, decentralization, privatization, and managerialism —poses challenges to important public service values We argue that reinventing government, contrary to its most ardent proponents' rhetoric, threatens to undermine the important role played by public servants in modern democratic governments The broad implications of this argument are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker, R. (1991). The role of the state and the bureaucracy in developing countries since World War II. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration (pp. 353-363). New York: Marcel Dekker.
2.
Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy A new vision for managing in governmentBerkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Butler, R. (1991, Autumn). New challenges or familiar prescriptions ? Public Administration, 69, 363-372.
4.
Caiden, G. (1991a). Administrative reform. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration (pp. 367-380). New York: Marcel Dekker.
5.
Caiden, G. (1991b). Administrative reform comes of age. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
6.
Caiden, G. (1994, March-April). Administrative reform—American style. Public Administration Review54, 123-128.
7.
Chnstoph, J. (1992, August). The remaking of British administrative culture. Administration and Society24, 163-181.
8.
Cothran, D. (1993, September-October). Entrepreneurial budgeting: An emerging reform? Public Administration Review, 53, 445-454.
9.
Dubnick, M. (1994). A coup against king bureaucracy? In J. DiIulio (Ed.), Deregulating the public service (pp. 249-287). Washington, D.C.: Brookmgs.
10.
Dunshire, A. & Hood, C.C. (1989). Cutback management in public bureaucracies. Cambridge: Cambndge University Press.
11.
Economist (1992, October 31). Reshaping Britain's civil service. Economist, 19-21.
12.
Esman, M. (1991). The state, government bureaucracies, and their alternatives. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration (pp. 457-465). New York: Marcel Dekker.
13.
Fitzgerald, R. & Lipson, G. (1984). Pork barrel. Washington, D.C. : The Cato Institute.
14.
Fulton, E.K. (1993, March 31). Gathering dust. Maclean's , 10-11.
15.
Gant, G.F. (1979). Development administration: Concepts, goals, and methods. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
16.
Goodsell, C. (1993, January-February). Remvent government or rediscover it? Public Administration Review, 53, 85-87.
17.
Gore, A. (1993). From red tape to results : Creating a government that works better and costs less. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
Gregory, R.J. (1991, July 1). The attitudes of senior public servants in Australia and New Zealand: Administrative reform and technocratic consequences ? Governance, 4, 295-331.
19.
Halligan, J. (1991). Career public service and administrative reform in Australia. International Review of Administrative Sciences , 57, 345-360.
20.
Halligan, J. & Power, J. (1991). A framework for the analysis of recent changes in Australian executive branches. In A. Farazman (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration (pp. 91-99). New York: Marcel Dekker.
21.
Hammergren, L. (1983). Development and the politics of administrative reform. Lessons from Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press.
22.
Hays, S. (1998, Spring). Symposium: Reinventing the public personnel function. Public Administration Quarterly22, 3-113.
23.
Hays, S. & Kearney, R. (1997). Riding the crest of a wave: The National Performance Review and public management reform. International Journal of Public Administration20 (1), 11-40.
24.
Hine, D. (1993). Governing Italy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25.
Holmes, M. (1992, October). Public sector management reform: Convergence or divergence? Governance, 5, 472-483.
Hood, C. (1991, Spring). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
28.
Hood, C. (1990). Beyond the bureaucratic state Public administration in the 1990sLondon: School of Economics .
29.
Ingraham, P. & Eisenberg, E. (1995). Comparative examination of national civil service and personnel reforms. In J. Rabm (Ed.), Handbook of public personnel administrationNew York: Marcel Dekker.
30.
Ingraham, P. & Rosenbloom, D. (1988-89, Winter). Symposium on the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Policy Studies Journal17.
31.
Jasper, H. & Alpem, A. (1994, Spring). National Performance Review: The good, the bad, the indifferent. The Public Manager, 27-34.
32.
Jiaqi, G. (1992, October). Restructuring government organizations in China and transforming government functions for an efficient and more productive bureaucratic performance. Governance, 5, 391-401.
33.
Kam, A. & Shaw, G.J. (1993-94, Winter). Managers and top professionals band together. The Public Manager, 7-10.
34.
Kettl, D. (1994). Reinventing government? Appraising the National Performance Review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35.
Klingner, D. & Lynn, D. (1997). Beyond civil service: The changing face of public personnel management. Public Personnel Management, 26 (2), 157-173.
36.
Lan, Z. & Rosenbloom, D. (1992, November-December). Public administration in transition ? Public Administration Review, 52, 535-537.
37.
Leemans, A. (1987). Recent trends: The career service in European countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences , 53 (1), 63-88.
38.
Lmdeen, J. (1994). Governing America's economy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
39.
Lutjens, S. (1991). State administration in socialist Cuba. In A. Farazman (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration (pp. 325-338). New York: Marcel Dekker.
40.
Maruyama, M. (1993). Management reform in Eastern and Central Europe . Aldershot, England: Dartmouth .
41.
Mascarenhas, R.C. (1993, July-August). Building an enterprise culture in the public sector in Australia, Britain, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 53, 319-328.
42.
Moe, R. ( 1994, March-April). The 'reinventing government' exercise: Misinterpreting the problem, misjudging the consequences. Public Administration Review, 54, 111-122.
43.
Moe, R. & Gilmour, R. (1995, March-April). Rediscovering principles of public administration: The neglected foundation of public law. Public Administration Review, 55, 135-146.
44.
Moussios, A. & Legge, J. (1991). Implementing the denationalization options: Great Britain and the United States. In A. Farzmand (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration (pp. 41-52). New York: Marcel Dekker.
45.
Mutahaba, G., Beguma, R. &Halam, M. (1993). Vitalizing African public administration for recovery and development. West Hartford: Kumanan Press.
46.
Nakamura, A. & Koike, O. (1992, October). Responsible governance and problems of administrative reform: Experiences of developing countries in Asia. Governance, 4, 484-492.
47.
National Commission on the Public Service [Volcker Commission] (1989). Leadership for America: Rebuilding the public serviceWashington, D.C.: National Commission on the Public Service.
48.
National Commission on the State and Local Public Service [Winter Commission] (1993). Hard truths/tough choices: An agenda for state and local reform. Albany, New York : Nelson Rockefeller Institute of Government.
49.
Niskanan, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldme Atherton.
50.
Nunberg, B. (1995). Managing the civil service: Lessons from advanced industrialized countnesWashington, D.C.: The World Bank.
51.
Overman, E. & Boyd, K. (1992). Best practices research and postbureaucratic reform . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4 (1), 67-83.
52.
Perry, J. (1995). Compensation, merit pay, and motivation. In S. Hays & R. Kearney (Eds.), Public personnel administration: Problems and prospects (pp. 121-132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
53.
Peters, G. (1994). Managing the hollow state. International Journal of Public Administration, 17 (3 & 4), 739-756.
54.
Peters, G. (1991a). Government reform and reorganization in an era of retrenchment and conviction politics. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration (pp. 381-403). New York: Marcel Dekker.
55.
Peters, G. (1991b). Morale in the public service: A comparative inquiry . International Review of Administrative Sciences57, 421-440.
56.
Peters, G. & Savoie, D. (1994, September-October). Civil service reform: Misdiagnosing the patient. Public Administration Review, 54, 418-425.
57.
Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public service: The Anglo-American expenence. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
58.
Premfors, R. (1988). Governmental com-missions in Sweden. American Behavioral Scientist, 26, 467-489.
59.
Public Objective (1995, June). On the cutting edge: Governing in New Zealand, 1-3.
60.
Rainey, H. (1991). Understanding and managing public organizations . San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
61.
Rocha, J.A.O. (1998, Spring). The new public management and its consequences in the public personnel system. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18, 82-87.
62.
Rosenbloom, D. (1993, November-December). Editorial: Have an administrative RX? Don't forget the politics!Public Administration Review , 53, 503-507.
63.
Rothstein, P. (1993). Decentralization and changing fiscal rules in the Japanese local public sector. Public Finance, 48, 110-132.
64.
Rourke, F. (1992, November-December). Responsiveness and neutral competence in American bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 52, 539-546.
65.
Rourke, F. (1984). Bureaucracy, politics, and public policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
66.
Sakamoto, M. (1991). Public administration in Japan: Past and present in the higher civil service. In A. Farazman (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration (pp. 101-125). New York: Marcel Dekker.
67.
Savoie, D. (1994). Thatcher, Reagan, and Mulroney: In search of a new bureaucracy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
68.
Stahl, O. (1995). A retrospective and prospective: The moral dimension . In S. Hays and R. Kearney (Eds.), Public personnel administration: Problems and prospects (pp. 331-344). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
69.
Stewart, J. & Walsh, K. (1992, Winter). Change in the management of public services . Public Administration, 70, 499-518.
70.
U.S. General Accounting Office (1994). Management reforms. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
71.
Wilson, V. (1988). What legacy? The Nielsen Task Force Program Review . In K. Graham (Ed.), How Ottawa spends. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.
72.
Wolferen, K. (1993, September-October). Japan's non-revolution. Foreign Affairs, 72, 54-65.
