Ames, K., C. Sulavik, N. Joseph, L. Beachy and T. Park (1992) "Domesticated Bliss." Newsweek (March): 62-63.
2.
Barber, A., R.B. Dunham and R.A. Formisano( 1992). "The Impact of Flexible Benefits on Employee Satisfaction: A Field Study." Personnel Psychology45: 55-75.
3.
Bureau of National Affairs (1991) Recognizing Non-Traditional Families. Special Report #38.
4.
Colbert, C.R. III and J.G. Wofford (1993). "Sexual Orientation in the Workplace: The Strategic Challenge." Compensation and Benefits Management8: 1-18.
5.
Dinan, J. and T. Beeken (1991). Covering Domestic PartnersHMO Magazine (Sept/Oct )
6.
Dolbrin, A. (1989) "In Gay Marriage, A Longing for LegitimacyNewsday (December): 5.
7.
Employee Benefit Plan Review (1992) Benefits Offered to Domestic Partners. Volume 46 (January): 55.
Fineman, H. (1993) "Marching to the Mainstream." Newsweek (April). 43
11.
Fisher, M.J. (1990). "Health Benefits Surging as Strike Issue." National Underwriter947, 31.
12.
Gonsiorek, J. (1993). "Threat, Stress, and Adjustment: Mental Health and the Workplace for Gay and Lesbian Individuals," pp. 243-264 in L. Diamant (ed.) Homosexual Issues in the Workplace. Washington D.C : Taylor and Francis.
13.
Gossett, C. (1994). Domestic Partnership Benefits: Public Sector Patterns . Review of Public Personnel Administration14, 1: 64-84.
Higgins, Foster (1991). Domestic Partner Health Care Coverage 1991 Employer Survey Results. San Francisco
16.
lannuzzo, C. and A. Pink (1991). Benefits for the Domestic Partner of Gay and Lesbian Employees at Lotus Development Corporation. Boston: Simmons College Graduate School of Management
17.
Johnson, R.E. (1988). Flexible Benefit Plans," in J. Matzer Jr. (ed ) Pay and Benefits New Ideas for Local Government. Washington, D.C.: ICMA.
18.
Kerr, J., and J.W. Slocum (1987). Managing Corporate Culture Through Reward Systems . Academy of Management Executive1: 99-108.
19.
Mayor's Task Force on Family Policy (1990). Approaching 2000 Meeting the Challenges to San Franetsco's FamiliesSan Francisco.
20.
McCaffery, R.M. (1988). Employee Benefit Programs A Total Compensation Perspective. Boston. PWS- Kent.
21.
Murphy, E. (1992). Understanding the Domestic Partner Dilemma Perspectives of Employer and Insurer. City of West Hollywood.
22.
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (October 1992). Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights in the U. SWashington: D.C.: The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.
23.
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (1990). Domestic Partners/Nontraditional Family Recognition in Campus Benefit Policies 1990 Survey. Washington, D.C: The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.
24.
Penn and Schoen Assoc., Inc. (1991) A Report to the Human Rights Campaign Fund on Public Attitudes Towards Homosexuals and Their Place in the Military. HumanRightsCampaign Fund .
25.
Poverny, L.M. and W.A. Finch, Jr. (1988). "Gay and Lesbian Domestic Partnerships: Expanding the Definition of Family." Social Case-work. The Journal of Contemporary Social Work: 116-121.
26.
Ray, P. ( 1993, April) "Matching Employee Benefits to Employee Needs: AFSCME's Experiences." Paper presented at ASPA's national conference, San Francisco.
27.
Schneider, W. and I.A. Lewis (1984). The Straight Story on Homosexuality and Gay Rights . Public Opinion (February/March): 7, 16-20, 59-60.
28.
Sheridan, J.E. (1992) "Organizational Culture and Employee Retention ." Academy of Management Journal35: 1036-1056.
29.
Stanford University Committee on Faculty and Staff Benefits (1991). Report of the Subcommittee on Domestic Partners' Benefits. Palo Alto, California.
30.
Swan, W. (April 1992) "Domestic Partnerships The Legalization of Alternative Families." Paper presented at ASPA's national conference, Chicago.
31.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1992). Marital Status and Living Arrangements. Current Population Reports (series P-20, No. 468 . March. U. S. Government Printing Office , Washington, D.C
32.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990) Household and Family Characteristics Current Population Reports (series P-20, No. 447). March 1989 and 1990. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.
33.
U.S. General Accounting Office (August 1992 ). The Changing Workforce Comparison of Federal and Nonfederal Work/Family Programs and Approaches. (GAO / GGD-92-84) Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
34.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (November 1991). Balancing Work Responsibilities and Family Needs: The Federal Civil Service Response. Washington, D.C. : Government Printing Office.
35.
Wallace, M.J. Jr. and C.H. Fay (1988). Compensation Theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Kent .
36.
Wiatrowski. W.J. (1990). "Family-related Benefits in the Workplace." Monthly Labor Review113: 28-33.
37.
Wojcik, J. (1991a). "Few Offer Benefits to Unwed Couple." Busmess Insurance (March):1,30.
38.
Wojcik, J. (1991b). "Newspaper First to Offer Domestic Partner Plan ." Business Insurance (March): 30-31.
39.
Wooldridge, B. and J. Wester (1991). "Turbulent Environment of Public Personnel Administration: Responding to Challenges of the Changing Workplace of the Twenty-first Century " Public Personnel Management20: 207-224.