Scholars have used exchange theory to describe how unions contribute to candidates based on voting records, vulnerabil ity, and party identification. Although the theory has been well accepted, some of its assumptions have not been tested thoroughly. This study uses exchange theory to test new variables: system biases (ideology, right to work and public union laws) and economic interests (i.e., wage levels, public and private sector union differences). Results show that system biases and wages have a greater effect on the level of private sector contributions than on public sector contributions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
America Votes (1985). Washington, D.C.: Election Research Center.
2.
Babcock, C. (1992). "At Least the PACs Still Love Those Incumbents in Congress." The Washington Post Weekly Edition (June) 15-21: 32.
3.
Delaney, J., J. Fiorito, and M. Masters (1988). "The Effects of Organizational and Environmental Characteristics on Union Political Action." American Journal of Political Science32: 616-642.
4.
Federal Election Commission (1986). Federal Election Campaign Reports. Computer Index of Campaign Activity . Washington, D.C.: Federal Election Commission.
5.
Federal Election Commission (Sept. 15, 1992 ). PAC Contributions Up 10 Percent For '92 Races at 18-Month Mark. Washington, D.C.: Federal Election Commission.
6.
Freeman, R. and C. Ichniowski , eds. (1988). When Public Sector Workers Unionize . Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press
7.
Freeman, R. and J. Medoff (1979). "The Two Faces of Unionism." Public Interest54: 69-93.
8.
Gopoian, D. (1984). "What Makes PACs Tick? An Analysis of the Allocation Patterns of Economic Interest Groups." American Journal of Political Science28: 259-281.
9.
Gavernment Employee Relations Reporter (1990). State and Local Programs. RF-243, 51Washington, D.C.: BNA.
10.
Greenstone, J.D. (1975). "Group Theories" In F. Greenstone (ed.) Handbook of Political Science, Volume 2. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Herndon, J. (1982). "Access, Record, and Competition as Influences on Interest Group Contributions to Congressional Campaigns." Journal of Politics44: 996-1020.
12.
Hurd, R. and J. Sohl (1992). " Strategic Diversity in Union Political Action: Implications for the 1992 House Elections. Proceedings of the Forty-fourth Annual Meeting. Industrial Relations Research Association.
13.
Kau J. and P. Rubin (1981). "The Impact of Labor on the Passage of Economic Legislation." Journal of Labor Research2: 133-145.
14.
Masters, M. and J. Delaney (1984). "Interunion Variation in Congressional Campaign Support." Industrial Relations23: 410-416.
15.
___ ( 1985). "The Causes of Union Political Involvement: A Longitudinal Analysis." Journal of Labor Research6: 341-62.
16.
___ ( 1987a). "Contemporary Labor Political Investments and Performance ." Labor Studies Journal11: 220-37.
17.
___ ( 1987b). "Union Political Activities: A Review of the Empirical Literature." Industrial and Labor Relations Review40: 336-353.
18.
Masters, M. and A. Zardkoohi (1986). "The Determinants of Labor PAC Allocations to Legislators." Industrial Relations25: 328-336.
19.
Saltzman, G. (1987). "Congressional Voting on Labor Issues: The Role of PACs." Industrial and Labor Relations Review40: 163-79.
20.
____ ( 1988). "Public Sector Bargaining Really Matters," in Freeman and Ichniowski (ed) When Public Sector Workers Unionize. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.
21.
Smith, R. (1985). "Public Employee Unions and Politics in American Cities." Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector4: 1-12.
22.
Volunteer Workers Manual (n.d.). Washington, D.C.: Volunteers in Politics Dept. of COPE for the National AFL-CIO.
23.
Wright, G., R. Erikson, J. McIver (1985). "Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data." Journal of Politics45: 468-89.
