A growing consensus among administrators and academic researchers is that merit pay based on individual performance has failed in the public sector. At the same time, however, governments continue to express support for the merit pay concept. This article reviews the theoretical foundation and proposed advantages of merit pay systems, then identifies the four most critical problems associated with merit pay practices in the public service.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bann, C. and J. Johnson (1984). "Federal Employee Attitudes Toward Reform: Performance Evaluation and Merit Pay," pp. 65-86 in P. W. Ingraham and C. Ban (eds.) Legis lating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.Albany, NY : State University of New York Press.
2.
Condrey, S.E. and J.L. Brudney (1992). "Performance-Based Managerial Pay in the Federal Government : Does Agency Matter?"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory2, 2: 157-174.
3.
Cumming, C. (1988). "Linking Pay to Performance."Personnel Administrator33, 5: 47-52.
4.
Daley, D. (1987). "Merit Pay Enters with a Whimper: The Initial Federal Civil Service Reform Experiences."Review of Public Personnel Administration7 , 2: 72-79.
5.
Deming, W.E. (1986). Out of The Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Edelman, M. (1964). The Symbolic Uses of PoliticsUrbana: University of Illinois Press.
7.
Foster, G.D. and S.K. Snyder (1989). "Public Attitudes Toward Government : Contradiction, Ambivalence, and the Dilemmas of Response." pp. 71-94 in The Volcker Commission, Leadership for America : Rebuilding the Public ServiceLexington, MA: Lexington Books.
8.
Fox, C.J. (1991). "Employee Performance Appraisal: The Keystone Made of Clay," pp. 58-72 in C. Ban and N. M. Riccucci (eds.) Public Personnel Management: Current Concerns -- Future Challenges . New York: Longman.
9.
Fox, C.J. and H. Miller (1992). Symbolic Politics as Signature of the Postmodern Condition: Implications for Personnel PolicyPaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois.
10.
Fox, S.F. (1989). "Intergenerational Differences, Merit Pay, and Loyalty in State and Local Government."Review of Public Personnel Administration9, 2:15-27.
11.
Gabris, G.T. (1986). "Can A Merit Pay System Avoid Creating Discord between Supervisors and Subordinates? -- Another Uneasy Look at Performance Appraisal."Review of Public Personnel Administration7, 1: 70-89.
12.
Gaertner, K.N. and G.H. Gaertner (1984). "Performance Evaluation and Merit Pay: Results in the Environmental Protection Agency and the Mine Safety and Health Administration," pp. 87-111 in Ingraham and Ban (eds.) Legislating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.Albany, NY : State University of New York Press.
13.
— (1985). "Performance-Contingent Pay for Federal Managers."Administration and Society17, 1: 7-20.
14.
Golembiewski, R.T. (1986). "OD Perspectives on High Performance : Some Good News and Some Bad News about Merit Pay."Review of Public Personnel Administration7, 1:9-26.
15.
Goodsell, C.T. (1989). "Administration as Ritual."Public Administration Review49, 2:161-166.
16.
Gordon, J.R. (1990). A Diagnostic Approach to Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
17.
Hackman, J.R. and E.E. Lawler III (1971). "Employee Reactions to Job Characteristics."Journal of Applied Psychology55: 259-286.
18.
Hackman. J.R. and G.R. Oldham.1980. Work RedesignReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
Halachmi, A. and M. Holzer (1987). "Merit Pay, Performance Targeting, and Productivity."Review of Public Personnel Administration7, 2: 80-91.
20.
Heneman, H.G. and I.P. Young (1991). "Assessment of a Merit Pay Program for School District Administrators."Public Personnel Management20, 1: 35-47.
21.
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of ManCleveland: World Publishing Company.
22.
Ingraham, P.W. (1987). "Building Bridges or Burning Them? The President, the Appointees, and the Bureaucracy."Public Administration Review475:425-435.
23.
— (1991). Of Pigs in Pokes and Pay for Performance: An Analysis of Assumptions Guiding Policy ChoicePaper presented at the Conference on Public Management, The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University
24.
Kirschten, D. (1983). "Administration Using Carter-Era Reforms To Manipulate the Levers of Government."National Journal1515:732-736.
25.
Lane, L.M. and J.F. Wolf (1990). The Human Resource Crisis in the Public Sector: Rebuilding the Capacity to GovernNew York: Quorum Books.
26.
Latham, G.P. and K.N. Wexley (1981). Increasing Productivity through Performance Appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Lawler, E.E. III (1981). Pay and Organization Development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
— (1983). "Merit Pay: An Obsolete Policy?" pp. 305-310 in J. R. Hackman, E. E. Lawler III and L.W. Porter, (eds.) Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Lee, R.D., Jr. (1987). Public Personnel Systems, (2ond ed.). Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.
31.
Locke E.A. (1982). "The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation."Academy of Management Review7, 1: 14-24.
32.
Locke, E.A., D.B.Feren, V.M. McCaleb, K.N. Shaw and A.T. Denny (1980). "The Relative Effectiveness of Four Methods of Motivating Employee Performance," pp. 363-388 in K.D. Duncan and D. Wallis (eds.) Changes in Working Life. New York: John Wiley & Son, Ltd.
33.
Lovrich, N.P. (1987). "Merit Pay and Motivation in the Public Workforce: Beyond Technical Concerns to More Basic Considerations."Review of Public Personnel Administration7, 2: 54-71.
34.
Moe, T.M. (1985). "The Politicized Presidency," pp. 235-271 in J. Chubb and P. Peterson (eds.) The New Direction in American Politics . Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
35.
Mount, Michael K. (1987). "Coordinating Salary Action and Performance Appraisal," pp. 187-195 in D. B. Balkin and L. R. Gomez-Mejia (eds.) New Perspectives on Compensation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
36.
Nachmias, David and Paul J. Moderacki .1982. Patterns of Support for Merit Pay and EEO Performance : The Inherent Difficulties of Implementing Innovation."Policy Studies Journal11: 318-327.
37.
Nadler, D.A. and E.E. Lawler III (1983). "Motivation: A Diagnostic Approach," pp.67-87 in J. R. Hackman, E. E. Lawler III and L. W. Porter (eds.) Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
38.
National Research Council (1991). Pay for Performance: Evaluating Performance Appraisal and Merit PayWashington D.C.: National Academy Press .
39.
Newland, C.A. (1983). "A Midterm Appraisal -- The Reagan Presidency : Limited Government and Political Administration."Public Administration Review431:1-21.
40.
O'Toole, D.E. and J.R. Churchill (1982). "Implementing Pay-For-Performance : Initial Experiences."Review of Public Personnel Administration2, 3:13-28.
41.
Pagano, M.A. (1985). "An Exploratory Evaluation of the Civil Service Reform Act's Merit Pay System for the GS 13-15s: A Case Study of the U.S. Department Of Health and Human Services," pp. 161-176 in D. H. Rosenbloom (ed.) Public Personnel Policy: The Politics of Civil Service . Port Washington, NY: Associated Faculty Press.
42.
Pearce, J.L. (1989). "Rewarding Successful Performance," pp. 401-441 in J. L. Perry (ed.) Handbook of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Pearce, J.L. and J.L. Perry (1983). "Federal Merit Pay: A Longitudinal Analysis."Public Administration Review43: 315-325.
44.
Pearce, J.L. and L.W. Porter (1986). "Employee Responses to Formal Performance Appraisal Feedback."Journal of Applied Psychology71, 2:211-218.
45.
Pearce, J.L., W.B. Stevenson and J.L. Perry (1985). "Managerial Compensation Based on Organizational Performance: A Time Series Analysis of the Effects of Merit Pay."Academy of Management Journal28: 261-278.
46.
Perry, J.L. (1991). "Linking Pay to Performance: The Controversy Continues," pp. 73-86 in C. Ban and N. M. Riccucci (eds.) Public Personnel Management: Current Concerns -- Future Challenges. New York: Longman.
47.
— 1988-89. "Making Policy by Trial and Error: Merit Pay in the Federal Service" Policy Studies Journal17: 389-405.
48.
Perry, J.L. and J.L. Pearce (1985). "Civil Service Reform and the Politics of Performance Appraisal," pp. 146-158 in D. H. Rosenbloom (ed.). Public Personnel Policy: The Politics of Civil Service.Port Washington, NY: Associated Faculty Press.
49.
Perry, J.L., B.A. Petrakis and T.K. Miller (1989). "Federal Merit Pay, Round II: An Analysis of the Performance Management and Recognition System."Public Administration Review49: 29-37.
50.
Perry, J.L. and L.W. Porter (1982). "Factors Affecting the Context for Motivation in Public Organizations."Academy of Management Review7: 89-98.
51.
Perry, J.L. and L.R. Wise (1990). "The Motivational Bases of Public Service."Public Administration Review50: 367-373.
52.
Pinder, C.C. (1984). Work Motivation : Theory, Issues, and Application . Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
53.
Porter, L.W. and E.E. Lawler III (1968). Managerial Attitudes and Performance . Homewood, Ill: Dorsey Press.
54.
Rainey, H.G. (1982). "Reward Preferences Among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic."American Review of Public Administration16, 4: 299-302.
55.
— (1989). "Public Management: Recent Research on the Political Context and Managerial Roles, Structures, and Behaviors."Journal of Management15, 2:229-250.
56.
— (1991). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
57.
Schay, B.W. (1988). "Effects of Performance-Contingent Pay on Employee Attitudes."Public Personnel Management17, 2: 237-250.
58.
Sherwood, F. and B. Wechsler (1986). "The "Hadacol" of the Eighties: Paying Senior Public Managers for Performance."Review of Public Personnel Administration7, 1: 27-41.
59.
Siegel, G.B. (1987). "The Jury is Still Out on Merit Pay in Government."Review of Public Personnel Administration7: 3-15.
60.
Silverman, B.R. (1982). "The Merit Pay System: Prognosis."Review of Public Personnel Administration2, 3: 29-34.
61.
Stimson, R.A. (1980). "Performance Pay: Will It Work?"The Bureaucrat9, 2: 39-47.
62.
Thayer, F.C. (1984). "The President's Management Reforms: Theory X Triumphant," pp. 29-41 in P. W. Ingraham and C. Ban, (eds.) Legislating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
63.
Thompson, F.J., N.M. Riccucci and C. Ban (1991). "Drug Testing in the Federal Workplace: An Instrumental and Symbolic Assessment."Public Administration Review51, 6:515-525.
64.
U.S. Congress (1989). PMRS Reauthorization Act of 1989. U.S. Statutes at Large103: 670-672.
65.
— (1991a). Performance Management and Recognition System Amendments of 1991U.S. Statutes at Large105: 71
66.
— (1991b). Congressional Record, March 19, 1991, H1814.
67.
U.S. General Accounting Office (1984). A 2-Year Appraisal of Merit Pay in Three AgenciesWashington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
68.
U.S. House of Representatives (1989). Reauthorization of the Performance Management and Recognition System: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Compensation and Employee Benefits Serial No. 101-16. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
69.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (1990 ). Working for America: A Federal Employee SurveyWashington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office .
70.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (1991 ). Advancing Managerial Excellence : A Report on Improving the Performance Management and Recognition SystemWashington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
71.
Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
