This study represents an empirical investigation of civil servant orientations toward the regulation of bureaucratic conduct and discretion in a developing country—Brazil—and in an advanced capitalist country—the United States. Survey findings suggest that Brazilian civil servants are far more cautious and more likely to oppose the use of discretion than a comparable sample of American civil servants. Factors such as personal/background characteristics and value orientations were also investigated for their impact upon orientations toward the use of discretion, producing evidence of both common associations and some nation—specific effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AberbachJ. D.PutnamR. D.RackmanB. A. (1981). Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
2.
BergerP.LuckmanT. (1976). The Politics of Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
3.
CrozierM. (1964). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
DalandR. T. (1981). Exploring Brazilian Bureaucracy: Performance and Pathology. Washington DC: University Press.
5.
DalandR. T. (1972). “Attitudes Toward Change Among Brazilian Bureaucrats”Journal of Comparative Administration4 (August): 165–203.
6.
DenhartR. B. (1986). Theories of Public Organization. Monterey, Ca.: Brooks/Cole.
7.
DillmanD. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley and Sons.
8.
DownsA. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
9.
Forbes (1985). “The Successful Women” January: 9.
10.
HamishekE.JacksonJ. E. (1977). Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
11.
HarmonM. M.MayerR. T. (1986). Organization Theory for Public Administration. Boston: Little Brown.
12.
HendersonK. (1969). “Comparative Public Administration: The Identity Crisis”Journal of Comparative Administration1 (May): 65–85.
13.
HofstedeG. (1982). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
14.
HofstedeG. (1980). “Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad?”Organizational Dynamics9 (Spring): 42–63.
15.
HuntingtonS. P. (1980). “Officership as a Profession” pp. 37–45 in PerlmutterA.BennettV. P. (eds.) The Political Influences of the Military. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16.
InglehartR. (1979). “Value Priorities and Socioeconomic Change” pp. 305–342 in BarnesS.KaaseM. (eds.) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
17.
InglehartR. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
InglehartR. (1971). “The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies”American Political Science Review65: 991–1017.
19.
LawlerE. (1986). High-Involvement Management: Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
LongN. E. (1949). “Power and Administration”Public Administration Review9 (Autumn): 257–264.
21.
LovrichN. P. (1981). “Professional Ethics and the Public Interest: Sources of Judgment”Public Personnel Management10 (Spring): 87–92.
22.
MaslowA. (1971). The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Viking Press.
23.
MaslowA. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
24.
MaslowA. (1943). “A Theory of Human Motivation”Psychological Review50: 370–396.
25.
McClellandD. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
26.
McDonoughP. (1981). Power and Ideology in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
27.
MendozaG. A. (1977). “The Transferability of Western Management Concepts and Programs, an Asian Perspective” pp. 46–78 in BlackJ.ColemanJ.StifelL. (eds.) Education and Training for Public Sector Management in Developing Countries. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation,.
28.
MilesR. E.RitchieJ. B. (1971). “Participative Management: Quality vs. Quantity”California Management Review13: 48–56.
29.
MorisJ. R. (1977). “The Transferability of Western Management Concepts and Programs, an East African Perspective” pp. 79–93 in BlackJ.ColemanJ.StifelL. (eds.) Education and Training for Public Sector Management in Developing Countries. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.
30.
ParsonsT. (1956). “Suggestions for a Sociological Approach in the Theory of Organizations”Administrative Science Quarterly1: 63–85.
31.
PetersG. (1984). The Politics of Bureaucracy. New York: Longman.
32.
RoettR. (1972). Brazil: Politics in a Patrimonial Society. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
33.
RosenB. C. (1964). “The Achievement Syndrome and Economic Growth in Brazil”Social Forces42 (March): 341–353.
34.
RosenB. C. (1962). “Socialization and Achievement Motivation in Brazil”American Sociological Review27 (October): 341–353.
35.
RourkeF. (1976). Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. Boston: Little Brown.
36.
SavageP. (1976). “Optimism and Pessimism in Comparative Public Administration”Public Administration Review36 (July/August): 415–423.
37.
SharkanskyI. (1982). Public Administration: Agencies, Policies and Politics. New York: W. H. Freeman.
38.
SharkanskyI. (1975). The United States: A Developing Country. New York: Longman.
39.
SiffinW. J. (1959). “Toward the Comparative Study of Public Administration” pp. 1–22 in SiffinW. (ed.) Toward the Comparative Study of Public Administration. Bloomington, Ind.: University of Indiana Press.
SloanJ. W. (1982). “Bureaucracy and Public Policy in Latin America” pp. 303–334 in TummalaS. (ed.) Administrative Systems Abroad. New York: University Press of America.
42.
StewartB. (1978). Change and Bureaucracy: Public Administration in Venezuela. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
43.
ThompsonV. A. (1965). “Bureaucracy and Innovation”Administrative Science Quarterly10 (June): 1–20.
44.
WaldoD. (1980). The Enterprise of Public Administration. Novato, CA: Chandler and Sharp Publishing Co.
45.
WeaverJ. L. (1973). “Bureaucracy During a Period of Social Change: The Case of Guatemala” pp. 37–52 in ThurberC. E.GrahamL. (eds.) Development Administration in Latin America. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
46.
WeaverJ. L. (1970). “Value Patterns of a Latin American Bureaucracy”Human Relations23 (June): 225–233.
47.
WebberR. A. (1977). “Convergence or Divergence” pp. 96–123 in WeinshallT. D. (ed.) Culture and Management. New York: Penguin Books.
