In recent years numerous studies have compared such work-related attitudes of employees of public and private organizations as work satisfaction, organizational commitment, and perceived relations between performance and rewards ("reward expectancies"). These comparisons are rele vant to various theoretical and institutional design issues, including civil service reform. This paper reviews these studies and discusses problems in methodology and in the aggregation of findings in this area of research. It then reports a comparison of "extrinsic expectancies" — perceived rela tions of pay and promotion to performance — on the part of public and private employees in two states. The results replicate a previous study which found weaker extrinsic reward expectancies on the part of public employees. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications for theory and for administrative reform.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, M., R. Schmidt and S. Baxter (1984). "Evaluating the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978: The Experience of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services," in P. W. Ingraham and C. Ban (eds.) Legislating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
Allison, G.T. (1983). "Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in all Unimportant Respects?," in J. L. Perry and K. Kraemer (eds.) Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
3.
Barton, A.H. (1980). "A Diagnosis of Bureaucratic Maladies," in C. H. Weiss and A. H. Barton (eds.) Making Bureaucracies Work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Blumenthal, W.M. (1983). "Candid Reflections of a Businessman in Washington ," in J. L. Perry and K. L. Kraemer (eds.) Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
5.
Blunt, B.E. (1981). "Organizational Leadership: An Analysis of Supervisor-Subordinate Linkages Utilizing the Path-Goal Approach." Unpublished dissertationTallahassee: Florida State University.
6.
Bozeman, B. and S. Loveless (1984). "Sector Status and Performance: A Comparison of Industrial and Governmental Research Units." Working paper. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Technology and Information Policy Program.
7.
Buchanan, B. (1974). "Government Managers, Business Executives, and Organizational Commitment." Public Administration Review35: 339-347.
8.
_ ( 1975). "Red Tape and the Service Ethic: Some Unexpected Differences Between Public and Private Managers." Administration and Society6: 423-438.
9.
Campbell, J.P. and R.D. Pritchard (1976). "Motivation Theory in Industrial and Organizational Psychology," in M. D. Dunnette (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
10.
Dahl, R.A. and C.E. Lindbloom (1953). Politics, Economics and Welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston : Little Brown.
12.
Dunlop, J.T. (1983). "Public Management," in J. L. Perry and K. Kraemer (eds.) Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
13.
Gaertner, K.N. and G.H. Gaertner (1985). "Performance-Contingent Pay for Federal Managers ." Administration and Society17 (May): 7-20.
14.
_(1984 ). "Performance Evaluation and Merit Pay: Results in the Environmental Protection Agency and the Mine Safety and Health Administration," in P. W. Ingraham and C. Ban (eds.) Legislating Bureaucratic Change: the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.
15.
Golembiewski, R.T. (1985). Humanizing Public Organizations. Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond.
Hayward, N. (1978). "Employee Attitudes and Productivity Differences Between the Public and Private Sectors." Washington, D.C. : Productivity Information Center, National Technical Information Center, U.S. Department of Commerce.
18.
Ingraham, P.W. (1984). "The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978: The Design and Legislative History," in P. W. Ingraham and C. Ban (eds.) Legislating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
Ingraham, P. W. and C. Ban , eds. (1984). Legislating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
Kilpatrick, F.P. and M.C. Cummings and M.K. Jennings (1964). The Image of the Federal Service. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
21.
Lachman, R. (1983). "Perception of Role-Environment Among Public and Private Sector Executives." Academy of Management Proceedings .
22.
Lawler, E. (1973). Pay and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Lindblom, C.E. (1977). Politics and Markets. New York : Basic Books.
24.
Macy, J.W. (1971). Public Service: The Human Side of Government. New York: Harper and Row.
25.
Meyer, M.W. (1979). Change in Public Bureaucracies. London: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.
27.
Paine, F.T., S.J. Carroll and B.A. Leete (1966). "Need Satisfaction of Managerial Level Personnel in a Government Agency." Journal of Applied Psychology50: 247-249.
28.
Pearce, J.L. and J.L. Perry (1983). "Federal Merit Pay: A Longitudinal Analysis." Public Administration Review43 (July/August): 1.
29.
Pearce, J.L., W.B. Stevenson and J.L. Perry (1985). "Managerial Compensation Based on Organizational Performance: A Time Series Analysis of the Effects of Merit Pay." Academy of Management Journal28: 261-278.
30.
Perry, J.L., H.G. Rainey and B. Bozeman (1985). "The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy." Paper presented at the 1985 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association , August.
31.
Porter, L.W. and E.E. Lawler (1968). Managerial Attitudes and Behavior. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.
32.
Prokesch, S.E. (1985). "Companies Turn to Incentives: Pay Linked to Performance ." New York Times, July 19.
33.
Pugh, D.S., D.J. Hickson and C.R. Hinings (1969). "An Empirical Taxonomy of Work Organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly14: 115-126.
34.
Rainey, H.G. (1983). "Public Agencies and Private Firms: Incentive Structures, Goals, and Individual Roles." Administration and Society15: 207-242.
35.
Rainey, H.G., J.L. Perry and B. Bozeman (1982). "Empirical Comparisons of Public and Private Organizations: Conceptual and Methodological Issues." Paper presented at the National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration , March.
36.
Rhinehart, J.B., R.P. Barrel, A.S. DeWolfe, J.E. Griffin and F.E. Spaner (1969). "Comparative Study of Need Satisfaction in Government and Business Hierarchies." Journal of Applied Psychology52: 230-235.
37.
Rawls, J.R., R.A. Ulrich and O.T. Nelson (1975). "A Comparison of Managers Entering or Reentering the Profit and Nonprofit Sectors." Academy of Management Journal18 (December): 616-622.
38.
Romzek, B. and J.S. Hendricks (1982). "Organizational Involvement and Representative Bureaucracy: Can We Have It Both Ways?" American Political Science Review76: 75-82.
39.
Savas, E.S. (1982). Privatizing the Public Sector. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
40.
Savas, E.S. and S.G. Ginsburg (1973). "The Civil Service: A Meritless System." In The Public Interest32: 72-84.
41.
Sherwood, F.P. and W.J. Page (1983). "MBO and the Public Management," in J. L. Perry and K. Kraemer (eds.) Public Management: Public and Private Perspectives . Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.
42.
Smith, M.P. and S.L. Nock (1980). "Social Class and the Quality of Life in Public and Private Organizations." Journal of Social Issues36: 59-75.
43.
Solomon, E. and M. Greenberg (1982). "Organizational Climate in the Public and Private Sectors." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, New York.
44.
Thayer, F.C. (1984). "The President's Management "Reforms": Theory X Triumphant," in P. W. Ingraham and C. Ban (eds.) Legislating Bureaucratic Change: The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. Albany: State University of New York.
45.
Thompson, F.J. (1975). Personnel Policy in the City. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46.
Tolbert, P.S. (1985). Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Higher Education." Administrative Science Quarterly23: 22-29.
47.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (1979). Federal Employee Attitudes. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
48.
Van deVen, A.H. and D.L. Ferry (1980). Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
49.
Wamsley, G.L. and M.N. Zald (1983). The Political Economy of Public Organizations . Lexington, MA: Lexington.
50.
Warwick, D.P. (1975). A Theory of Public Bureaucracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
