This paper summarizes the results of an evaluation of the formal discussion requirement of the federal labor-management relations program. The results suggest that the goals of the formal discus sion requirement are unclear and that its current interpretation bears no relationship to the intent of the original 1961 policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bureau of National Affairs (1981). Government Employee Relations Report. No. 923. Washington, D.C.: 6-7.
2.
Hart, W.R. (1961). Collective Bargaining in the Federal Civil Service . New York: Harper and Brothers .
3.
Landau, M. (1969). "Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap." Public Administration Review19, 4 (July-August): 346-58.
4.
Loney, T.J. (1983). Federal Labor-Management Relations, The Formal Discussion Provision—A Comprehensive History, Case Analysis and Policy Study in Goal Deflection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Southern California.
5.
( 1984). Telephone Interviews With Federal Managers Regarding the Formal Discussion. Unpublished report.
6.
Meade, M. (1979). "Public Employee Unionism Revisited—Perspectives of the 1970's." Public Administration Review39, 1 (January-February): 91-94.
7.
Nesbitt, M.B. (1976). Labor Relations in the Federal Government Service . Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.
8.
Perry, J.L. (1979). "Collective Bargaining—The Search for Solutions ." Public Administration Review39, 3(May-June): 290-294.
9.
Sebris, R. (1977). "Formal or Informal: What are the Union's Rights ?" Public Personnel Management6, 3(May-June): 156-165.
10.
U.S. Congress, House (1947). Labor Management Relations Act, amended by Public Law 86-257, 1959. Public Law 101. 80th Cong., 1st sess. Washington, D.C.
11.
U.S. Congress, House. Subcommittee on Postal Personnel and Modernization of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. (1979 ). Legislative History of the Federal Labor Management Relations Statute: Title VII of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. 96th Cong., 1st sessWashington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
12.
U.S. General Accounting Office (1982). Steps Can Be Taken to Improve Federal Labor-Management Relations and Reduce the Number and Costs of Unfair Labor Practice Charges. GAO/FPCD-83-5. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Printing Office.
13.
Vosloo, W.B. (1966). Collective Bargaining in the United States Federal Civil Service. Chicago: Public Personnel Association.
