Impasse resolution procedures, often utilized m the settlement of public sector disputes, have been found to have an impact on the collective bargaining process. This paper analyzes the impact of these procedures on both current and future negotiations by reviewing the evidence that details the influence on strike deterrence and contract acceptability, as well as the chilling, narcotic and half-life effects. Findings indicate that when strike avoidance is a major priority for a government, impasse procedures culminating in arbitration can effectively deter strikes without senously affect ing the collective bargaining process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. and T. Kochan (1977). "Impasses Procedures in the Canadian Federal Services: Effects on the Bargaining Process." Industrial and Labor Relations Review30: 283-301.
2.
Bazerman, M.H. and M. Neale (1982). "Improving Negotiation Effectiveness Under Final Offer Arbitration: The Role of Selection and Training." Journal of Applied Psychology67: 543-548.
3.
Butler, R.J. and R.G. Ehrenberg (1981). "Estimating the Narcotic Effect of Public Sector Impasse Procedures." Industrial and Labor Relations Review35: 3-20.
4.
Chelius, J.R. and M.M. Extejt (1983). "The Impact of Arbitration on the Process of Collective Bargaining." Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector12: 327-336.
5.
Chelius, J.R. and M.M. Extejt (forthcoming). "The Narcotic Effect of Impasse Resolution Procedures ." Industrial and Labor Relations Review.
6.
Committee for Economic Development (1961). The Public Interest in National Labor Policy. New York : Committee for Economic Development.
7.
DeNisi, A.S. and J.B. Dworkin (1981). "Final Offer Arbitration and the Naive Negotiator ." Industrial and Labor Relations Review35: 78-87.
8.
Feigenbaum C. (1975). "Final Offer Arbitration: Better Theory than Practice ." Industrial Relations14: 311-317.
9.
Feuille, P. (1975). "Final Offer Arbitration and the Chilling Effect ." Industrial Relations14: 302-310.
10.
Feuille, P. (1979). "Selected Benefits and Costs of Compulsory Arbitration ." Industrial and Labor Relations Review33: 64-76.
11.
Friedman, D.R. and S.S. Mukamal (1984). "Wisconsin's Mediation-Arbitration Law: What Has It Done to Bargaining?" Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector13: 171-190.
12.
Gallagher, D.M. and M.D. Chaubey (1982). "Impasse Behavior and Tri-Offer Arbitration in Iowa." Industrial Relations21: 129-148.
13.
Gatewood, L. (1974). "Factfinding in Teacher Disputes: The Wisconsin Experience." Monthly Labor Review97: 47-51.
14.
Grisby, D.M. and W.J. Bigoness (1982). "Effects of Mediation and Alternative Forms of Arbitration on Bargaining Behavior: A Laboratory Study." Journal of Applied Psychology67: 549-554.
15.
Grodin, J.R. (1972). "Either-Or Arbitration for Public Employee Disputes ." Industrial Relations11: 160-166.
16.
Ichniowski, C. (1982). "Arbitration and Police Bargaining: Prescription for the Blue Flu." Industrial Relations21: 149-164.
17.
Kochan, T. and J. Baderschneider (1978). "Dependence on Impasse Procedures: Police and Firefighters in New York." Industrial and Labor Relations Review31: 431-449.
18.
Kochan, T.A., M. Mironi, R. Ehrenberg, J. Baderschneider, and T. Jick (1979). Dispute Resolution under Factfinding and Arbitration: An Empirical Analysis. New York: American Arbitration Association.
19.
Loewenberg, J., W. Gershenfeld, H. Glasbeek, B. Hepple, K. Walker (1976). Compulsory Arbitration. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
20.
Magenau, J.M. (1983). "The Impact of Alternative Impasse Procedures on Bargaining: A Laboratory Experiment." Industrial and Labor Relations Review36: 361-377.
21.
Nigro, L.G. and J.J. DeMarco (1980). "Collective Bargaining and the Attitude of Local Government Personnel Managers." Public Personnel Management9: 160-171.
22.
Notz, W.W. and F.A. Starke (1980). "Final Offer vs Conventional Arbitration as Means of Conflict Management." Administrative Science Quarterly32: 189-203.
23.
Olson, C.A. (1978). "Final Offer Arbitration in Wisconsin after Five Years." Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association Thirty-First Annual Meeting 31: 111-119.
24.
Olson, C., J. Stern, J. Najita, and J. Weisburger (1981). Strikes and Strike Penalties in the Public Sector , Technical Report. U.S. Department of Labor (Report submitted March 1981).
25.
Robitzek, W.D. (1979). "Final Offer Arbitration and the Labor-Management Posse: Heading Off Municipal Disputes at the Impasse." Brigham Young University Law Review59: 105-128.
26.
Stern, J.L. (1984). "A Look Ahead at Public Sector Unionism." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science473: 165-176.
27.
Stern, J., C. Rehmus, J. Lowenberg, H. Kasper, B. Dennis (1975). Final-Offer Arbitration. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
28.
Stevens, C. (1966). "Is Compulsory Arbitration Compatible With Bargaining ?" Industrial Relations5: 38-52.
29.
Subbarao, A.V. (1978). "The Impact of Binding Arbitration on Negotiation and Process Outcome." Journal of Conflict Resolution22: 79-103.
30.
Weitzman, J.P. (1980). Mediation and Final Offer Arbitration: A Neutral View. Institute of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers — The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
