While pension reforms for public employees are implemented frequently around the world, there is still limited understanding of how these employees respond to and adapt to such changes. Utilizing the 2015 Public Officials Pension Reform in South Korea as the research context, this study investigates the impact of pension reform on employee satisfaction with the public service profession during the reform period and how this impact evolved in the post-reform years. Drawing on yearly repeated cross-sectional data from 15,270 public employees collected between 2013 and 2019, our empirical analysis reveals a significant decline in employee satisfaction with the public service profession following the initiation of pension reform in 2014, with a subsequent rebound to pre-reform levels in the later years. These findings offer valuable insights for navigating the challenges of pension reform and enhancing employee satisfaction during the reform process.
AsherM. G. (2000, March). Reforming civil service pensions in selected Asian countries [Paper presentation]. World Bank Social Security Workshop, World Bank, Washington, DC.
2.
AsherM. G.VasudevanD. (2004). Civil service pension reform. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(51), 5363–5365.
3.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (2001). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press.
4.
ChoY. J.LewisG. B. (2012). Turnover intention and turnover behavior: Implications for retaining federal employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 4–23.
5.
CoggburnJ. D.KearneyR. C. (2010). Trouble keeping promises? An analysis of underfunding in state retiree benefits. Public Administrative Review, 70(1), 97–108.
6.
Coyle-ShapiroJ. A. M.KesslerI. (2002). Exploring reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract: Employee and employer perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(1), 69–86.
7.
DisneyR. (2016). Pension reform in the United Kingdom: An economic perspective. National Institute Economic Review, 237(1), R6–R14.
8.
GorinaE.HoangT. (2020). Pension reforms and public sector turnover. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(1), 96–112.
9.
GoughO.ArkaniS. (2011). The impact of the shifting pensions landscape on the psychological contract. Personnel Review, 40(2), 173–184.
10.
HansenS. D.GriepY. (2016). Organizational commitment and its related constructs: Psychological contracts. In MeyerJ. (Ed.), Handbook of employee commitment (pp. 119–132). Edward Elgar Publishing.
11.
JudgeT. A.ChurchA. H. (2000). Job satisfaction: research and practice. In CooperC. L.LockeE. A. (Eds.), Industrial and organizational psychology: Linking theory with practice (pp. 166–198). Blackwell.
12.
KimP. S.ChunJ. Y. (2019). A critical review of the 2015 South Korean civil service pension reform. Public Money & Management, 39(5), 369–378.
13.
KimS. Y.FernandezS. (2017). Employee empowerment and turnover intention in the U.S. federal bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(1), 4–22.
14.
KimT.ParkG. (2014). A comparison study between National Pension Scheme and Government Employees Pension Scheme: Focusing on the effect of public pension system reform. Journal of Governmental Studies, 20(3), 173–204.
15.
KimY.JungY.SeohD.ImT. (2019). Higher public service motivation for accepting public sector pension reform? Evidence from Korean Government Organizations. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 34(1), 23–42.
16.
Korea Institute of Public Administration. (2013). Public employee perception survey 2013 [Data set].
17.
Korea Institute of Public Administration. (2014). Public employee perception survey 2014 [Data set].
18.
Korea Institute of Public Administration. (2015). Public employee perception survey 2015 [Data set].
19.
Korea Institute of Public Administration. (2016). Public employee perception survey 2016 [Data set].
20.
Korea Institute of Public Administration. (2017). Public employee perception survey 2017 [Data set].
21.
Korea Institute of Public Administration. (2018). Public employee perception survey 2018 [Data set].
22.
Korea Institute of Public Administration. (2019). Public employee perception survey 2019 [Data set].
23.
KwonH. (2015). Analysis of the 2015 revision of the Public Officials Pension Act. Korean Journal of Legislative Studies, 21(2), 295–306.
24.
KwonH.KimE. (2011). Transition from the developmental state: The deliberative policy process of civil service pension reform in Korea. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 26(3), 91–111.
25.
KwonH.KwakH. (2006). Reform of the civil service pension scheme and policy issues. Korean Policy Studies Review, 15(4), 189–213.
26.
LordR. G.DiefendorffJ. M.SchmidtA. M.HallR. J. (2010). Self-regulation at work. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 543–568.
27.
MansonB. J. (2000). Downsizing issues: The impact on employee morale and productivity. Garland.
28.
Ministry of Personnel Management. (2016). 2015 Korean Civil Service Pension Reform White Paper.
29.
MorrisonE. W.RobinsonS. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256.
30.
MussagulovaA.ChenC. A.Dennis DongH. K. (2022). Confronting pension reform: Public employees’ psychological contract breach, negative perception, regret, and the moderating role of PSM. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(4), 641–668.
31.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychological theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
32.
OECD. (2022). OECD reviews of pension systems: Korea.
33.
PalaciosR.WhitehouseE. (2006). Civil-service pension schemes around the world (Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper No. 0602). World Bank.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
36.
ReillyT. (2013). Comparing public-versus-private sector pay and benefits: Examining lifetime compensation. Public Personnel Management, 42(2), 512–544.
37.
RobinsonS. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.
38.
RousseauD. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511–541.
39.
RousseauD. M.HansenS. D.TomprouM. (2018). A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1081–1098.
40.
SeldenS. C.MoynihanD. P. (2000). A model of voluntary turnover in state government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20, 63–74.
41.
SolingerO. N.HofmansJ.BalP. M.JansenP. G. (2016). Bouncing back from psychological contract breach: How commitment recovers over time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 494–514.
42.
TerryN.WhiteP. (2000). When is a promise a strategic liability?Employee Relations, 22(3), 272–281.
43.
TiniosP.PoupakisS. (2013). Knowledge is power: Public attitudes and the stalling of pension reform in Greece. Journal of Population Ageing, 6, 247–267.
44.
TomprouM.RousseauD. M.HansenS. D. (2015). The psychological contracts of violation victims: A post-violation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 561–581.
45.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2018). Central States Pension Fund: Investment policy decisions and challenges facing the plan. United States Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Requesters.
46.
ZhaoH.WayneS. J.GlibkowskiB. C.BravoJ. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680.
