This essay analyzes a watershed moment in the history of the U.S. federal civil service, driven by politically motivated reforms under the Trump administration. I explore how workforce reductions might affect key public services, the legal controversies surrounding Trump’s mass layoffs, and I project a rapid expansion of privatization. I posit how these factors might undermine responsiveness to vulnerable populations and erode oversight capacities essential to democratic governance. I argue that political economy, administrative, and constitutional law frameworks are the intellectual ballasts that most cogently support a response to these actions. I argue that a “parallel state” is being developed that undermines democratic responsiveness and accountability. Ultimately, I argue for rebuilding the federal workforce through reinvestment in (1) civil service protections that are attuned to emerging technologies and new economies, (2) programs that attract top talent, (3) institutional knowledge, and (4) merit-based hiring principles that are flexible to public needs.
CookB. J. (2021). The fourth branch: Reconstructing the administrative state for the commercial republic. University Press of Kansas.
5.
EmersonB. (2022). ‘Policy’ in the administrative procedure act: Implications for delegation, deference, and democracy. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 97, 113.
6.
FredericksonH. G. (1990). Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228–237
7.
Government Accountability Office. (2025). Department of defense workforce planning: risks and recommendations. (GAO-25-456).
McCannP. J. C.ShipanC. R. (2021). How many major US laws delegate to federal agencies? (Almost) all of them. Political Science Research and Methods, 10(3), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.35
11.
MettlerS. (2018). The government-citizen disconnect. Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
MichaelsJ. D. (2017). Constitutional coup: Privatization’s threat to the American republic. Harvard University Press.
13.
MoeT. M. (1990). Political institutions: The neglected side of the story. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 6, 213.
14.
ReshW. G. (2015). Rethinking the administrative presidency: Trust, intellectual capital, and appointee-careerist relations in the George W. Bush administration. Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
ReshW. G. (2019). The disarticulation of the administrative state (and public administration). Administration & Society, 51(3), 347–370.
ReshW. G. (2025b, February5). Testimony before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform, “Rightsizing Government” Hearing [Testimony]. House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
18.
ReshW. G.MingY.XiaX.OvertonM.GürbüzG. N.De BruhlB. (2025). Complementarity, augmentation, or substitutivity? The impact of generative artificial intelligence on the U.S. federal workforce. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09637. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.09637
RosenbloomD. H. (2000). Retrofitting the administrative state to the constitution: congress and the judiciary;s twentieth-century progress. Public Administration Review, 60(1), 39–46.
21.
RosenbloomD. H. (2013). Reflections on “Public Administrative Theory and the Separation of Powers”. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013483167
22.
SalamonL. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.
23.
SelinJ. L.Clouser McCannP. J. (2025). Constraining the executive branch: delegation, agency independence, and congressional design of judicial review. Northwestern University Law Review, 119(5), 1273-1366.
