Favoritism in the Federal Workplace: Are Rules the Solution?

Abstract

We develop and test a more comprehensive theory of the sources and effects of workplace favoritism by drawing on a large, agency-wide sample of U.S. Federal Aviation Administration employees. We report how members of various underrepresented groups differ in their perceptions of a variety of sources of favoritism. We find that their perceptions of friendship favoritism are an important source of perception of workplace favoritism for all employees. We show that perceptions of favoritism are negatively associated with employee trust in their organizations and coworkers, commitment to their organizations, willingness to speak up, and pay satisfaction, with friendship favoritism significantly dominating over most other sources. Further, we find that team leaders, supervisors, managers, and executives, with their greater knowledge of organizational processes, report less favoritism. This and previous research provide practical guidance on how greater transparency may reduce employee perceptions of favoritism in the federal workforce while avoiding discredited formalistic constraints.

Keywords

favoritism merit diversity transparency bias

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. S.

(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz

(Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2 267-299). Academic Press.

Al-Aiban

K. M.

Pearce

J. L.

(1993). The influence of values on management practices. International Studies of Management and Organization, 23, 35–52.

Andrews

I. R.

Henry

M. M.

(1963). Management attitudes toward pay. Industrial Relations, 3, 29–49.

Asseburg

Homberg

(2020). Public Service Motivation or sector rewards? Two studies on the determinants of sector attraction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40, 82–111.

Balliett

Dreu

C. K. W.

(2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1556–1581.

Bauer

C. C.

Baltes

B. B.

(2002). Reducing the effects of gender stereotypes on performance evaluations. Sex Roles, 47, 465–476.

Bies

R. J.

Moag

J. S.

(1986). Interactional justice. In Sheppard

(Ed.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43–55). JAI Press.

Bishu

S. G.

Kennedy

A. R.

(2019). Trends and gaps: A meta-review of representative bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Policy, 40, 559–588.

Bloom

(1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 25–40.

10.

Brewer

G. A.

Walker

R. M.

(2013). Personnel constraints in public organizations: The impact of reward and punishment in organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 73, 121–131.

11.

Bridge

Baxter

L. A.

(1992). Blended relationships. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports), 56, 200–225.

12.

Byrne

D. E.

(1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.

13.

Card

Mas

Moretti

Saez

(2012). Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. American Economic Review, 102, 2981–3003.

14.

Carnevale

D. G.

Wechsler

(1992). Trust in the public sector: Individual and organizational determinants. Administration & Society, 23, 471–494.

15.

Castilla

E. J.

(2008). Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1479–1526.

16.

Coggburn

J. D.

Daley

D. M.

Jameson

J. K.

Berry-James

R. M

. (2020). Assessing the six-factor model. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40, 355–383.

17.

DiIulio

J. J.

Jr. (1994). What is deregulating the public service? In DiIulio Jr.

J. J.

(Ed.) Deregulating the public service: Can government be improved? (pp. 1–11). Brookings.

18.

DiTomaso

(2015). Racism and discrimination versus advantage and favoritism. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 57–77.

19.

Ertug

Bennecke

Kovács

Zou

(2022). What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. Academy of Management Annals, 16, 38–69.

20.

Foley

Williamson

(2019). Managerial perspectives on implicit bias, affirmative action, and merit. Public Administration Review, 79, 35–45.

21.

Folger

Konovsky

M. A.

(1989). Effects of procedural justice, distributive justice, and reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.

22.

Foschi

(2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21–42.

23.

Frey

Bernstein

Rekenthaler

(2022). Scarlet letters: Rehabilitation through transgression transparency and personal narrative control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67, 968–1011. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00018392221115154

24.

Gooden

S. T.

(2014). Race and social equity: A nervous area of government. M. E. Sharpe.

25.

Griggs v. Duke Power Co . 401 U.S. 424, 91 S. Ct. 849, 28 L. Ed. 2nd 158 (1971).

26.

Hays

S. W.

Sowa

J. E.

(2006). A broader look at the “accountability” movement: Some grim realities in state civil service systems. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 102–117.

27.

Hennessy

West

M. A.

(1999). Intergroup behavior in organizations. Small Group Research, 30, 361–382.

28.

Hur

Perry

J. L.

(2020). Job security rule changes and employee organizational commitment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40, 641–668.

29.

Inghram

P. W.

(1995). The foundations of merit: Public service in American democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press.

30.

Johnson

Lewis

G. B.

(2020). Inspecting the merit system’s “pivotal idea”: Does competitive examination increase the qualifications and quality of the U.S. federal service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40, 202–221.

31.

Jones

E. E.

(1974). Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. General Learning.

32.

Kearney

R. D.

Coggburn

J. D.

(2016). The civil service under siege. In Kearney

R. D.

Coggburn

J. D.

(Eds.), Public human resources management: Problems and prospects (6th ed., pp. 375–384). CQ Press.

33.

Krackhardt

Porter

L. W.

(1985). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers’ attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 242–261.

34.

Kunda

(1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. MIT Press.

35.

Le Blanc

P. M.

Hox

J. J.

Schaufeli

W. B.

Taris

T. W.

Peeters

M. C. W

. (2007). Take care! Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 213–227.

36.

Lee

S-Y.

(2021). Is more commitment always better? A study on the side effects of excessive organizational commitment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41, 25–56.

37.

Leonard

A. S.

Mehra

Katerbeg

(2008). The social identity and social networks of ethnic minority groups in organizations: A crucial test of distinctiveness theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 573–589.

38.

Leslie

L. M.

(2019). Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences. Academy of Management Review, 44, 538–563.

39.

Leventhal

G. S.

Karuza

Jr. Fry

W. R.

(1980). Beyond fairness. In Mikula

(Ed.), Justice and social interactions (pp. 167–218). Springer-Verlag.

40.

Lewis

G. B.

(1997). Race, sex, and performance ratings in the Federal Service. Public Administrative Review, 57, 479–489.

41.

Lind

E. A.

van den Bos

(2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181–223.

42.

Martocchio

J. J.

Whitener

E. M.

(1992). Fairness in personnel selection: A meta-analysis and policy implications. Human Relations, 45, 489–506.

43.

Mengistu

Vogel

(2003). Theoretical underpinnings of Bureaucratic Neutrality in an ethnic federalism. Northeast African Studies, 10, 49–65.

44.

Methot

J. R.

LePine

Podsakoff

N. P.

Christian

J. S.

(2016). Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of workplace friendships and associations with job performance. Personnel Psychology, 6, 311–355.

45.

Nelson

Piatak

(2021). Intersectionality, leadership, and inclusion: How do racially underrepresented women fare in the Federal government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41, 294–318.

46.

O’Reilly

C. A.

Chatman

(1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.

47.

Pearce

J. L.

(2001). Organization and management in the embrace of government. Erlbaum.

48.

Pearce

J. L.

Branyczki

Bakacsi

G. A.

(2000). Person-based reward systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 261–282.

49.

Pearce

J. L.

Klein

(2017). Are secret proceedings why longer tenured employees trust their organizations least? Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 24, 437–449.

50.

Pearce

J. L.

Wang

(2021). Antecedents of workplace favoritism and its negative consequences [Conference session]. The 32nd international congress of psychology, July 18 – July 23 Prague, Czech Republic.

51.

Pearce

J. L.

Q. J.

(2012). Rating performance or contesting status: Evidence against the homophily explanation for supervisor demographic skew in performance ratings. Organization Science, 23, 373–385.

52.

Perry

J. L.

(2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 471–488.

53.

Pierce

C. A.

Aquinis

(2009). Moving beyond a legal-centric approach to managing workplace romances. Human Resources Management, 48, 447–464.

54.

Pillemer

Rothbard

N. P.

(2018). Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Academy of Management Review, 43, 635–660.

55.

Poocharoen

O-o.

Brillantes

(2013). Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: Status, issues, and challenges. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 140–163.

56.

Portillo

Bearfield

Humphrey

(2020). The myth of bureaucratic neutrality: Institutionalized inequity in local government hiring. Review of Personnel Administration, 40, 516–531.

57.

Pulakos

E. D.

Wexley

K. N.

(1983). The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 129–139.

58.

Robertson

Galvin

B. M.

Charles

A. C.

(2007). Bias in performance appraisal. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 617–650.

59.

Rosnow

R. L.

Fine

G. A.

(1976). Rumors and gossip. Elsevier.

60.

Roth

P. L.

Huffcutt

A. I.

Bobko

(2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694–706.

61.

Sacerdote

Marmaros

(2005). How do friendships form? (Working Paper 11530). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w11530

62.

Scoppa

(2009). Intergenerational transfers of public sector jobs: A shred of evidence on nepotism. Public Choice, 141, 167–188.

63.

Sedikides

Strube

M. J.

(1995). The multiply motivated self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1330–1335.

64.

Smith-Doerr

Fitzpatrick

Alegria

Tomaskovic-Devey

Fealingeg

K. H.

(2019). Gender pay gaps in U.S. federal science agencies: An organizational approach. American Journal of Sociology, 125, 534–576.

65.

Solomon

B. C.

Hall

M. E. K.

Muir (Zapata)

C. P

. (2021). When and why bias suppression is difficult to sustain: The asymmetric effect of intermittent accountability. Academy of Management Journal, 65, 1450–1476.

66.

Sowa

J. E.

(2016). Managing employee problems: State government grievance and complaint resolution systems and practices. In Kearney

R. D.

Coggburn

J. D.

(Eds.), Public human resources management: Problems and prospects (6th ed., pp. 225–238). CQ Press.

67.

Sutter

Kocher

M. G.

(2004). Favoritism of agents. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 461–469.

68.

Tsui

A. S.

O’Reilly

C. A.

III . (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in supervisor-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423.

69.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

Obstfeld

(2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421.