Advocates often present veterans as an untapped resource for local governments to boost the public service workforce. However, there is a lack of understanding of how human resource (HR) professionals value military experience when assessing candidate preparedness for a managerial career in public service. We examine how veteran status affects U.S. city and county HR directors’ evaluations of candidates for entry-level managerial positions in local government. Using an experimental design, we randomly assign candidate characteristics of veteran status and gender, and we observe HR directors’ assessments of candidate preparedness. Our findings reveal a premium on veteran status for candidate assessments relative to similar private sector experience in assessments of candidate experience. At the same time, the results are less conclusive when compared to similar public sector experiences. In addition, we find no clear evidence of disparate assessments of candidate preparedness as a function of candidate gender.
BaertS.BalcaenP. (2013). The impact of military work experience on later hiring chances in the civilian labour market. Evidence from a field experiment. Economics, 7(1), 2013–2027.
2.
BergmanM.HerdA. (2017). Proven leadership= college credit: Enhancing employability of transitioning military members through prior learning assessment. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 19(1), 78–87.
3.
BordieriJ. E.DrehmerD. E. (1984). Vietnam veterans: Fighting the employment war. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14(4), 341–347.
4.
Boyd-SwanC.HerbstC. M. (2019). Racial and ethnic discrimination in the labor market for child care teachers. Educational Researcher, 48(7), 394–406.
5.
BrennerO.TomkiewiczJ.ScheinV. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 662–669.
6.
DavisV. E.MinnisS. E. (2017). Military veterans’ transferrable skills: An HRD practitioner dilemma. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 19(1), 6–13.
7.
DoJ. J.SamuelsS. M. (2021). I am a warrior: An analysis of the military masculine-warrior narrative among U.S. Air Force officer candidates. Armed Forces & Society, 47(1), 25–47.
8.
DoanA. E.PortilloS. (2017). Not a woman, but a soldier: Exploring identity through translocational positionality. Sex Roles, 76(3–4), 236–249.
9.
DunivinK. O. (1994). Military culture: Change and continuity. Armed Forces & Society, 20(4), 531–547.
10.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.
11.
FunkK. D. (2019). If the shoe fits: Gender role congruity and evaluations of public managers. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(1), 1–10.
12.
FunkK. D.JensenU. T.MolinaA. L.Jr.StritchJ. M. (2021). Does leader gender matter for performance evaluations? Evidence from two experiments. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2000222
13.
GorsuchM. M. (2019). Gender, sexual orientation, and behavioral norms in the labor market. ILR Review, 72(4), 927–954.
14.
HarrellM. C.BerglassN. (2012). Employing America’s veterans. Center for a New American Security.
15.
HeilmanM. E.OkimotoT. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81–92.
16.
HipesC.LucasJ.PhelanJ. C.WhiteR. C. (2016). The stigma of mental illness in the labor market. Social Science Research, 56, 16–25.
17.
HsiehC. W.WinslowE. (2006). Gender representation in the federal workforce: A comparison among groups. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 276–295.
18.
JohnsonT. (2015). Service after serving: Does veterans’ preference diminish the quality of the U.S. federal service?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 669–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu033
19.
JohnsonT.WalkerR. W. (2018). The career advancement of military veterans in recent cohorts of the U.S. executive branch. Public Personnel Management, 47(4), 382–397.
20.
KleykampM. (2009). A great place to start? The effect of prior military service on hiring. Armed Forces & Society, 35(2), 266-285.
21.
KleykampM.HipesC. (2015). Coverage of veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in the U.S. media. Sociological Forum, 30(2), 348–368.
22.
LandgraveM.WellerN. (2022) Do name-based treatments violate information equivalence? Evidence from a correspondence audit experiment. Political Analysis, 30(1), 142–147.
23.
LewisG. B.EmmertM. A. (1984). Who Pays for Veterans’ Preference?. Administration & Society, 16(3), 328–345.
24.
LewisG. B. (2013). The impact of veterans’ preference on the composition and quality of the federal civil service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus029
25.
LewisG. B.PathakR. (2014). The employment of veterans in state and local government service. State and Local Government Review, 46(2), 91–105.
26.
LiggansG.AttohP. A.GongT.ChaseT.RussellM. B.ClarkP. W. (2019). Military veterans in federal agencies: Organizational inclusion, human resource practices, and trust in leadership as predictors of organizational commitment. Public Personnel Management, 48(3), 413–437.
27.
MacLeanA.KleykampM. (2014). Coming home: Attitudes toward U.S. veterans returning from Iraq. Social Problems, 61(1), 131–154.
28.
ManiB. G. (1999). Challenges and opportunities for women to advance in the federal civil service: Veterans’ preference and promotions. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 523–534.
29.
MittalD.DrummondK. L.BlevinsD.CurranG.CorriganP.SullivanG. (2013). Stigma associated with PTSD: Perceptions of treatment seeking combat veterans. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 36(2), 86–92.
30.
NeumarkD.BankR. J.Van NortK. D. (1996). Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 915–941.
31.
OrdwayS. H.Jr. (1945). The veteran in the civil service. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 238(1), 133–139.
32.
PiatakJ. S.SowaJ. E.JacobsonW. S.McGinnis JohnsonJ. (2020). Infusing public service motivation (PSM) throughout the employment relationship: A review of PSM and the human resource management process. International Public Management Journal, 24(1), 86–105.
33.
PorumbescuG. A.PiotrowskiS. J.MabillardV. (2021). Performance information, racial bias, and citizen evaluations of government: Evidence from two studies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 523–541.
34.
ScheinV. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100.
35.
SegalD. R.BachmanJ. G.Freedman-DoanP.O’MalleyP. M. (1999). Propensity to serve in the U.S. military: Temporal trends and subgroup differences. Armed Forces & Society, 25(3), 407–427.
36.
ShepherdS.KayA. C.GrayK. (2019). Military veterans are morally typecast as agentic but unfeeling: Implications for veteran employment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153, 75–88.
37.
SmithA. E. (2015). On the edge of a glass cliff: Women in leadership in public organizations. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 484–517.
38.
SmithA. E.MonaghanK. R. (2013). Some ceilings have more cracks: Representative bureaucracy in federal regulatory agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(1), 50–71.
39.
StoneC.StoneD. L. (2015). Factors affecting hiring decisions about veterans. Human Resource Management Review, 25(1), 68–79.
40.
StreetA. E.VogtD.DutraL. (2009). A new generation of women veterans: Stressors faced by women deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 685–694.
41.
TaoA. K.CampbellJ. W. (2019). Veterans and job satisfaction in the U.S. federal government: The importance of role clarity in the first years of civilian employment. Public Personnel Management, 49(4), 508–531
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
