Pay variation across positions, functions, and ranks can affect government performance by influencing the ability of the government to recruit and incentivize civil servants, but this proposition has not been systematically examined. Taking advantage of a new panel dataset, we develop and test the theoretical linkage between pay variation of civil servants and government performance. Our findings show a contingency-based relationship between pay variation and government performance. On average, neither total pay variation nor vertical pay variation is significantly related to government performance measured by the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators. However, total pay variation is consistently and negatively correlated with government performance in low-income countries. The findings suggest the importance of accounting for national contexts in implementing administrative reforms and are a cautionary lesson about applying theories based on research on private firms to the public sector.
AllisonG. T. (2004). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In ShafritzJ. M.HydeA. C.ParkesS. J. (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 396–413). Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. https://doi.org/10.2307/2212271
2.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity In Social Exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
3.
AkerlofG. A.YellenJ. L. (1990). The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937787
4.
AmirkhanyanA. A.KimH. J.LambrightK. T. (2014). The performance puzzle: Understanding the factors influencing alternative dimensions and views of performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut021
5.
AngY. Y. (2016). How China escaped the poverty trap. Cornell University Press.
6.
AngY. Y. (2020). China’s gilded age: The paradox of economic boom and vast corruption. University of Cambridge.
7.
BaigF. A.HanX.HasnainZ.RoggerD. (2021). Introducing the worldwide bureaucracy indicators: A new global dataset on public sector employment and compensation. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13355
8.
BinderkrantzA. S.ChristensenJ. G. (2012). Agency performance and executive pay in government: An empirical test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUR039
9.
BorjasG. J. (2002). The wage structure and the sorting of workers into the public sector. NBER Working Paper Series, 9313, 1–45.
10.
BrezaE.KaurS.ShamdasaniY. (2018). The morale effects of pay inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2), 611–663. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx041
ChunY. H.RaineyH. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui001
13.
ConnellyB. L.HaynesK. T.TihanyiL.GamacheD. L.DeversC. E. (2013). Minding the gap: Antecedents and consequences of top management-to-worker pay dispersion. Journal of Management, 42(4), 862–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503015
14.
ConnellyB. L.TihanyiL.CrookT. R.GangloffK. A. (2014). Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. Journal of Management, 40(1), 16–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313498902
15.
ConroyS. A.GuptaN.ShawJ. D.ParkT. Y. (2014). A multilevel approach to the effects of pay variation. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 32, 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-730120140000032001
16.
CowherdD. M.LevineD. (1992). Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), 302–320.
17.
DahlströmC.LapuenteV.TeorellJ. (2012). The merit of meritocratization: Politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911408109
18.
DahlströmC.TeorellJ.DahlbergS.HartmannF.LindbergA.NistotskayaM. (2015). The QoG expert survey dataset II. The Quality of Government Institute.
19.
Dal BoE.FinanF.RossiM. A. (2013). Strengthening state capabilities: The role of financial incentives in the call to public service. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(3), 1169–1218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt008
EvansP.RauchJ. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748–765.
22.
GächterS.SchulzJ. F. (2016). Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies. Nature, 531(7595), 496–499. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17160
23.
Garcia-SanchezI. M.Cuadrado-BallesterosB.Frias-AceitunoJ. (2013). Determinants of Government Effectiveness. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(8), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.772630
24.
GerhartB. A.NewmanJ. M. (2019). Compensation (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
HanushekE. A.LinkS.WoessmannL. (2013). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002
27.
HarariM. B.HerstD. E. L.ParolaH. R.CarmonaB. P. (2017). Organizational correlates of public service motivation: A meta-analysis of two decades of empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/JOPART/MUW056
28.
HeinrichC. J. (2007). False or fitting recognition? The use of high performance bonuses in motivating organizational achievements. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20244
JamesG.WittenD.HastieT.TibshiraniR. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R. Springer.
31.
KatzL. F.KruegerA. (1991). Changes in the structure of wages in the public and private sectors (NBER Working Papers Series). NBER.
32.
KaufmanD.KraayA.MastruzziM. (2007). The worldwide governance indicators project: Answering the critics. World Bank.
33.
KeppelerF.PapenfuβU. (2022). Understanding vertical pay dispersion in the public sector: The role of publicness for manager-to-worker pay ratios and interdisciplinary agenda for future research. Public Management Review, 24, 1846–1871. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1942531
34.
LeeS. Y.WhitfordA. B. (2009). Government Effectiveness in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(2), 249–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980902888111
LazearE.RosenS. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864.
38.
LiuB.TangT. L.-P. (2011). Does the love of money moderate the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction? The case of Chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02411.x
39.
NistoskayaM.DahlbergS.DahlstromC.SundstromA.AxelssonS.Mert DaliC.Alvarado PachonN. (2021). The quality of government expert survey 2020 (Vol. 2020, Issue March). The Quality of Government Institute.
40.
OliverosV.SchusterC. (2017). Merit, tenure, and bureaucratic behavior: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in the Dominican Republic. Comparative Political Studies, 51(6), 759–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710268
PapenfußU.KeppelerF. (2020). Does performance-related pay and public service motivation research treat state-owned enterprises like a neglected Cinderella? A systematic literature review and agenda for future research on performance effects. Public Management Review, 22(7), 1119–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1740300
43.
PearceJ. L.PerryJ. L. (1983). Federal merit pay: A longitudinal analysis. Public Administration Review, 43(4), 315. https://doi.org/10.2307/975834
44.
PerryJ. L. (2016). Building global public administration knowledge. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 533–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12588
45.
PerryJ. L.EngbersT. A.JunS. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01939_2.x
46.
PfefferJ.LangtonN. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 382–407.
47.
Freedom House (2018). Freedom in the World 2018: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
RaineyH. G.BozemanB. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024276
50.
RauchJ. E.EvansP. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4
51.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12505
52.
RouenE. (2020). Rethinking measurement of pay disparity and its relation to firm performance. The Accounting Review, 95, 343–378. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2867041
53.
SchanzenbachM. (2015). Explaining the public-sector pay gap: The role of skill and college major. Journal of Human Capital, 9(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/680596
54.
SchickA. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/13.1.123
55.
SchusterC.Meyer-SahlingJ. H.MikkelsenK. S. (2020). (Un)principled principals, (un)principled agents: The differential effects of managerial civil service reforms on corruption in developing and OECD countries. Governance, 33, 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12461
TreismanD. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418
58.
TrevorC. O.ReillyG.GerhartB. (2012). Reconsidering pay dispersion’ s effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 585–610.
59.
TrevorC. O.WazeterD. L. (2006). A contingent view of reactions to objective pay conditions: Interdependence among pay structure characteristics and pay relative to internal and external referents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1260–1275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1260
60.
U.S Merit System Protection Board. (2008). Attracting the next generation to mining. Author.
61.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. John Wiley & Sons.
62.
WeibelA.RostK.OsterlohM. (2010). Pay for Performance in the Public Sector–Benefits and (Hidden) Costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup009
63.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2ed ed.). MIT Press.
64.
World Bank. (2014). Pay flexibility and government performance: A multicountry study (Issue June). Author.
65.
YanguasP.BukenyaB. (2016). ‘New’ approaches confront ‘old’ challenges in African public sector reform. Third World Quarterly, 37(1), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1086635
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
