I’m Only Human: A New E-road to Advancing Social Equity Through a Humanist Approach to Mentoring in Public Service

Abstract

This research reviews how mentoring has manifested in public service and how it can evolve to be better positioned to address key diversity, equity, and inclusion objectives. This work inventories the current understanding of public sector mentoring, highlighting the contrast between the classical mentoring approach of functionalism with the emerging humanist approach. Barriers to implementing meaningful humanist mentoring are reviewed, and e-mentoring is presented as a modality well situated to overcome these obstacles. The humanist e-mentoring model provides a process and modality to advance social equity by removing existing barriers to opportunities. Finally, best practices and outcomes for successfully implementing e-mentoring humanist and relationships in public service are presented and an updated model of critical outcomes is advanced. A brief agenda for future scholarship on this topic is presented.

Keywords

mentoring e-mentoring humanist gender equity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmeyer

A. S.

Prather

Thombs

D. L.

(1994). Mentoring-in-public-administration scales: Construct validation and relationship to level of management. Public Productivity & Management Review, 17(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380835

Alvarez

A. R.

Lazzari

M. M.

(2016). Feminist mentoring and relational cultural theory: A case example and implications. Affilia, 31(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109915612512

Angelique

Kyle

Taylor

(2002). Mentors and muses: New strategies for academic success. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017968906264

Băleanu

Irimie

(2011). Mentoring in public management: Conceptual and practical approaches at the national and international level. Annals of the University of Petrosani Economics, 11(4), 33–44.

Beech

B. M.

Norris

K. C.

(2018). Perspective: Person-environment congruence: A call for increased precision in matching research mentors and mentees. Ethnicity & Disease, 28(1), 1–2.

Bellé

(2014). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut033

Bierema

(2017). eMentoring: Computer mediated career development for the future. In Clutterbuck

D. A.

Kochan

F. K.

Lunsford

Domínguez

Haddock-Millar

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of mentoring (pp. 482–497). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402011

Blessett

(2020). Rethinking the Administrative State Through an Intersectional Framework. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2018.1517526

Bozeman

Feeney

M. K.

(2007). Toward a useful theory of mentoring: A conceptual analysis and critique. Administration & Society, 39(6), 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304119

10.

Bozeman

Feeney

M. K.

(2008). Mentor matching: A “goodness of fit” model. Administration & Society, 40(5), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399708320184

11.

Bozeman

Feeney

M. K.

(2009). Public management mentoring: A three-tier model. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29(2), 134–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x08325768

12.

Branco

Ramos

M. R.

Hewstone

(2019). The association of group-based discrimination with health and well-being: A comparison of ableism with other “isms. Journal of Social Issues, 75(3), 814–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12340

13.

Byrne

Z. S.

Dik

B. J.

Chiaburu

D. S.

(2008). Alternatives to traditional mentoring in fostering career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.010

14.

Caillier

J. G.

(2015). Transformational leadership and whistle-blowing attitudes: Is this relationship mediated by organizational commitment and public service motivation? The American Review of Public Administration, 45(4), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013515299

15.

Chen

Y.-C.

(2013). Effect of reverse mentoring on traditional mentoring functions. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 13(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)lm.1943-5630.0000227

16.

Christensen

R. K.

Paarlberg

Perry

J. L.

(2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12796

17.

Colley

(2001). Righting rewritings of the myth of mentor: A critical perspective on career guidance mentoring. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 29(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880020047120

18.

Connell

(2006). Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 837–849.

19.

Coombs

Goodwin

(2013). Give them something to talk about: the role of dialogue in mentoring relationships. The English Journal, 102(3), 58–64.

20.

Culpepper

D. W.

(2008). Determining the quality and impact of an e-mentoring model on at-risk youth [University of South Florida]. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1197&context=etd

21.

D’Agostino

M. J.

(2017). Changing the narrative: The difference women make in public administration. Administration & Society, 49(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716641986

22.

Darwin

(2000). Critical reflections on mentoring in work settings. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417130022087008

23.

Dimock

(2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where millennials end and generation z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/

24.

DiRenzo

M. S.

Linnehan

Shao

Rosenberg

W. L.

(2010). A moderated mediation model of e-mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.003

25.

Doyle

Jacobs

Ryan

(2016). Faculty mentors’ perspectives on e-mentoring post-professional occupational therapy doctoral students. Occupational Therapy International, 23(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1431

26.

Eagan

J. L.

(2017). Foreclosure and dispossession: The case for a feminist critical theory for public administration. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 17(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijotb-17-01-2014-b003

27.

Edwards

L. H.

Holmes

M. H.

Sowa

J. E.

(2019). Including women in public affairs departments: Diversity is not enough. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 25(2), 163–184.

28.

Foley

Williamson

(2019). Managerial perspectives on implicit bias, affirmative action, and merit. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12955

29.

Fox

R. L.

Schuhmann

R. A.

(2001). Mentoring experiences of women city managers: Are women disadvantaged? The American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740122065009

30.

Fry

(2018, March 1). Millennials expected to outnumber Boomers in 2019. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/01/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers/

31.

Fry

(2019, July 24). Baby Boomers are staying in the labor force at rates not seen in generations for people their age. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/24/baby-boomers-us-labor-force/

32.

Gooden

S. T.

(2015). PAR’s social equity footprint. Public Administration Review, 75, 372–381.

33.

Gooden

S. T.

(2017). Social equity and evidence: Insights from local government. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 822–828.

34.

Guul

T. S.

(2018). The individual-level effect of gender matching in representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12907

35.

Haas

Hall

Vlasnik

S. L.

(2018). Finding optimal mentor-mentee matches: A case study in applied two-sided matching. Heliyon, 4(6), e00634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00634

36.

Hale

M. M.

(1995). Mentoring women in organizations: Practice in search of theory. The American Review of Public Administration, 25(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409502500402

37.

Headlam-Wells

Gosland

Craig

(2006). Beyond the organisation: The design and management of e-mentoring systems. International Journal of Information Management, 26(5), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.04.001

38.

Hebl

M. R.

Tonidandel

Ruggs

E. N.

(2012). The impact of like-mentors for gay/lesbian employees. Human Performance, 25, 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2011.631645

39.

Hendry

(2002). The principal’s other problems: Honest incompetence and the specification of objectives. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134371

40.

Heppe

E. C. M.

Kupersmidt

J. B.

Kef

Schuengel

(2019). Does having a similar disability matter for match outcomes? A randomized study of matching mentors and mentees by visual impairment. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22116

41.

Holmes

M. H.

(2012). Raising the ranks of public sector leaders: Results of a national survey of executive masters of public administration programs. Public Personnel Management, 41(3), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102601204100304

42.

Hopkins-Thompson

P. A.

(2000). Colleagues helping colleagues: Mentoring and coaching. NASSP Bulletin, 84(617), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650008461704

43.

Humble

Á. M.

Solomon

C. R.

Allen

K. R.

Blaisure

K. R.

Johnson

M. P

. (2006). Feminism and mentoring of graduate students. Family Relations, 55(1), 2–15.

44.

Jacobsen

C. B.

Bøgh Andersen

(2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12380

45.

Johnson

N. J.

Svara

J. H.

(2011). Justice for all: Promoting social equity in public administration. New York, NY: Routledge.

46.

Jordan

J. V.

(2010). Relational-cultural therapy (1st ed.). American Psychological Association.

47.

Kim

K.-J.

Bonk

Zeng

(2005, June). Surveying the future of workplace e-learning. ELearn Magazine, an ACM Publication. https://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1073202

48.

Lenz

A. S.

(2016). Relational-cultural theory: Fostering the growth of a paradigm through empirical research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12100

49.

Levinson

Darrow

Klein

Levinson

McKee

(1978). The season of a man’s life. Alfred A. Knopf.

50.

Loureiro-Koechlin

Allan

(2010). Time, space and structure in an e-learning and e-mentoring project. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00975.x

51.

Luna

Cullen

D. L.

(1995). Empowering the faculty: Mentoring redirected and renewed. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 3, 1–87.

52.

Marcuse

(1991). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.

53.

McLoughlin

Brady

Lee

M. J. W.

Russell

(2007, November 25–29). Peer-to-peer: An e-mentoring approach to developing community, mutual engagement and professional identity for pre-service teachers [Paper presentation]. Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference Fremantle, Western Australia.

54.

Meister

J. C.

Willyerd

(2010). Mentoring millennials (cover story). Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 68–72.

55.

Menges

(2016). Toward improving the effectiveness of formal mentoring programs: Matching by personality matters. Group & Organization Management, 41(1), 98–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115579567

56.

Milam

D. M.

(2003). Practitioner in the classroom: Bringing local government experience into the public administration curriculum. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 364–369.

57.

Moyer

L. P.

Haire

S. B.

(2015). Trailblazers and those that followed: Personal experiences, gender, and judicial empathy. Law & Society Review, 49(3), 665–689.

58.

Muller

C. B.

(2009). Understanding e-mentoring in organizations. Adult Learning, 20(1/2), 25–30.

59.

Nario-Redmond

M. R.

Kemerling

A. A.

Silverman

(2019). Hostile, benevolent, and ambivalent ableism: Contemporary manifestations. Journal of Social Issues, 75(3), 726–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12337

60.

Neal

Gherardi

Olejarski

A. M.

(2019). Beyond the turtle approach: Mid-career women in the public sector (In progress).

61.

Noe

R. A.

(1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41(3), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00638.x

62.

O’Leary

Choi

Gerard

C. M.

(2012). The skill set of the successful collaborator. Public Administration Review, 72, S70–S83.

63.

Packard

B. W.-L.

(2003). Web-based mentoring: Challenging traditional models to increase women’s access. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning, 11(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126032000054808

64.

Paly

(2011). Evaluating federal mentor-protege programs: Assessment, case studies and recommendations (p. 34). National Women’s Business Council. https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/gpo36382/FinalReport4_15_11.pdf

65.

Panopoulos

A. P.

Sarri

(2013). E-mentoring: The adoption process and innovation challenge. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.003

66.

Piotrowski

Kang

(2016). Book review: Professor Mommy: Finding work-family balance in academia and do babies matter? Gender and family in the ivory tower. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015613857

67.

Portillo

(2007). Mentoring minority and female students: Recommendations for improving mentoring in public administration and public affairs programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2007.12001470

68.

Power

(2009). One-dimensional woman. O Book.

69.

Power

(2013). Marcuse and feminism revisited. Radical Philosophy Review, 16, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev20131619

70.

Purgason

L. L.

Avent

J. R.

Cashwell

C. S.

Jordan

M. E.

Reese

R. F.

(2016). Culturally relevant advising: Applying relational-cultural theory in counselor education. Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(4), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12101

71.

Riccucci

N. M.

(Ed.). (2006). Public personnel management: Current concerns, future challengers (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

72.

Riccucci

N. M.

Van Ryzin

G. G.

(2017). Representative bureaucracy: A lever to ehance social equity, coproduction and democracy. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 21–30.

73.

Rogers

(2012). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=521599

74.

Rowland

K. N.

(2012). E-Mentoring: An innovative twist to traditional mentoring. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242012000100015

75.

Sabharwal

(2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 399–426.

76.

Simmonds

Zammit Lupi

A. M.

(2010). The matching process in e-mentoring: A case study in luxury hotels. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34(4), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591011039063

77.

Single

P. B.

Single

R. M.

(2005). E-mentoring for social equity: Review of research to inform program development. Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning, 13(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260500107481

78.

Stone center relational cultural theory: A window on relational mentoring . (2007). https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/sagementw/stone_center_relational_cultural_theory_a_window_on_relational_mentoring/0

79.

Valentin-Welch

(2016). Evaluation of a national E-Mentoring program for ethnically diverse student nurse-midwives and student midwives. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 61(6), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12547

80.

Van Louw

Waghid

. (2008). A deliberative democratic view of mentorship. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(1), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v22i1.25782

81.

Varney

(2009). Humanistic mentoring: Nurturing the person within. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 45(3), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2009.10517302

82.

Wilkins

V. M.

Keiser

L. R.

(2006). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 87–102.

83.

Williams

Sunderman

Kim

(2012). E-mentoring in an online course: Benefits and challenges to e-mentors. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 10, 109–123.

84.

Williams

S. L.

Kim

(2011). E-mentoring in online course projects: Description of an e-mentoring scheme. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 9(2), 80–95.

85.

Wilson

P. P.

Valentine

Pereira

(2002). Perception of new social work faculty about mentoring experiences. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(2), 317–333.