Recent evidence shows public service motivation (PSM) may be unrelated to one’s consideration of a public service career. In places where civil service examinations prevail, even adverse selection (selecting low-PSM individuals) can occur. This leaves public sector managers with tough questions: “Can we improve new recruits’ PSM? Does training matter?” The present study attempts to answer these questions by using a case of onboard training in Taiwan. We hypothesize that PSM, along with public service–related knowledge and a positive attitude toward public service work, improves after training, and that the improvement hinges on trainees’ satisfaction with training and perceived usefulness of training. Analytical results indicate that knowledge and attitudes are more “trainable” than PSM. Meanwhile, training satisfaction is associated with the growth of public service–related knowledge, while perceived training usefulness relates to a positive attitude toward public service work and PSM. Overall, these findings advance our understanding of the effectiveness of public service training, its determinants, and the implications for public employees’ public service orientations.
AlligerG. M.TannenbaumS. I.BennettW.TraverH.ShotlandA. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50, 341-358.
2.
AsseburgJ.HombergF. (2018). Public service motivation or sector rewards? Two studies on the determinants of sector attraction. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0734371X18778334
3.
Association for Talent Development. (2017). 2017 state of the industry. Alexandria, VA: Author.
4.
BozemanB.SuX. (2015). Public service motivation concepts and theory: A critique. Public Administration Review, 75, 700-710.
5.
ChenC.-A.ChenD.-Y.LiaoZ.-P.KuoM.-F. (2019). Winnowing out high-PSM candidates: The adverse selection effect of competitive public service exams. International Public Management Journal. Advance online publication.
6.
ChenC.-A.HsiehC.-W.ChenD.-Y. (2014). Fostering public service motivation through workplace trust: Evidence from public managers in Taiwan. Public Administration, 92, 954-973.
7.
ChenJ. (2014). Training arrangements for the newly appointed civil servants: Theory, evolution, and prospects. Taipei, Taiwan: Best-Wise.
8.
ChristensenR. K.WrightB. E. (2018). Public service motivation and ethical behavior: Evidence from three experiments. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 1, 1-8.
9.
CranoW. D.PrislinR. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345-374.
10.
DimitrovD. M.RumrillP. D.Jr. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20, 159-165.
11.
FredericksonH. G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
GiangrecoA.SebastianoA.PecceiR. (2009). Trainees’ reactions to training: An analysis of the factors affecting overall satisfaction with training. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 96-111.
14.
HuqueA.VyasL. (2008). Expectations and performance: Assessment of public service training in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 188-204.
15.
JilkeS.MeulemanB.Van de WalleS. (2015). We need to compare, but how? Measurement equivalence in comparative public administration. Public Administration Review, 75, 36-48. doi:10.1111/puar.12318
16.
JudgeT. A.Kammeyer-MuellerJ. D. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341-367.
17.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
18.
KjeldsenA. M.JacobsenC. B. (2013). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 899-926.
19.
KleinH. J.WeaverN. A. (2000). The effectiveness of an organizational-level orientation training program in the socialization of new hires. Personnel Psychology, 53, 47-66.
20.
KraigerK.FordJ. K.SalasE. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
21.
LandyF. J. (1989). Psychology of work behavior. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
22.
LandyF. J.ConteJ. M. (2016). Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
23.
LatifK. F.JanS.ShaheenN. (2013). Association of training satisfaction with employee development aspect of job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 7, 159-178.
24.
LeeG.ChoiD. L. (2016). Does public service motivation influence the intention to work in the public sector? Evidence from Korea. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36, 145-163.
25.
LievensF.HarrisM. M.Van KeerE.BisqueretC. (2003). Predicting cross-cultural training performance: The validity of personality, cognitive ability, and dimensions measured by an assessment center and a behavior description interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 476-489.
26.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67, 40-53.
27.
OwensP. L. J. (2006). One more reason not to cut your training budget: The relationship between training and organizational outcomes. Personnel Administration, 35, 163-172.
28.
PaddockS. C. (1997). Administrative benchmarks in management training. Public Productivity & Management Review, 21, 192-201.
29.
PerloffR. M. (2016). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 5-22.
31.
PettyR. E.BrinolP. (2010). Attitude change. In BaumeisterR. F.FinkelE. J. (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 217-259). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33.
PettyR. E.WegenerD. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-390). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
34.
ReeM. J.EarlesJ. A. (1991). Predicting training success: Not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321-332.
35.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76, 414-426.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
38.
SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499.
39.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A. (2013). Testing measurement and structural invariance: Implications for practice. In TeoT. (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methods for educational research (pp. 315-346). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publisher.
40.
SchmidtS. W. (2007). The relationship between satisfaction with workplace training and overall job satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 481-498.
41.
SeidleB.FernandezS.PerryJ. L. (2016). Do leadership training and development make a difference in the public sector? A panel study. Public Administration Review, 76, 603-613.
42.
SoB. W. Y. (2015). Exam-centred meritocracy in Taiwan: Hiring by merit or examination?Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74, 312-323.
43.
SuT. (2010). Civil service reform in Taiwan. In BermanE. M.MoonM. J.ChoiH. (Eds.), Public administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan (pp. 609-626). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
44.
SunT.-W. (2008). Rhetoric or action? An assessment of the administrative reform in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1, 52-70.
45.
TanQ. (2000). Democratization and bureaucratic restructuring in Taiwan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35, 48-64.
46.
TannenbaumS. I.MathieuJ. E.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 759-769.
47.
TaylorJ. (2008). Organizational influences, public service motivation and work outcomes: An Australian study. International Public Management Journal, 11, 67-88.
48.
TowlerA. J.DipboyeR. L. (2001). Effects of trainer expressiveness, organization, and trainee goal orientation on training outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 664-673.
49.
VandenabeeleW. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9, 545-556.
50.
VandenabeeleW. (2008). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration, 86, 1089-1105.
51.
ViswesvaranC.OnesD. S.SchmidtF. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.
52.
WarrP.AllanC.BirdiK. (1999). Predicting three levels of training outcome. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 351-375.
53.
WarrP.BunceD. (1995). Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning. Personnel Psychology, 48, 347-375.
54.
WellingtonJ.SzczerbinskiM. (2007). Research methods for the social sciences. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
55.
WexleyK. N.LathamG. P. (1991). Developing and training human resources in organizations. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
56.
WoodardC. A. (2007). Using adult learning theory for new-hire training. Journal of Adult Education, 36, 44-47.
57.
WrightB. E.ChristensenR. K.PandeyS. K. (2013). Measuring public service motivation: Exploring the equivalence of existing global measures. International Public Management Journal, 16, 197-223.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
