There is an increasing interest in the public management literature in questions related to street-level bureaucrats’ (SLBs) behaviors and attitudes and how these can be influenced. Complex and ambiguous working environments require SLBs to exercise discretion, and thereby bend rules to perform their daily tasks. This study identifies factors influencing SLBs’ rule-bending behaviors for procedural improvements. The concept of unbureaucratic behavior, defined as a rule-bending behavior for procedural improvements, serves as a theoretical basis. Relying on data of 1,003 enforcement officers from the German state police, this study’s findings indicate that SLBs’ unbureaucratic behavior can be influenced by stimulating employees’ voice behavior and their readiness for strategy. Surprisingly, SLBs’ access to resources does not significantly affect their exercise of unbureaucratic behavior.
AlgeB. J. (2001). Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 797-804.
2.
AveyJ. B.WernsingT. S.LuthansF. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Impact on psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(1), 48-70.
3.
BartonH. (2013). “Lean” policing? New approaches to business process improvement across the UK police service. Public Money & Management, 33(3), 221-224.
4.
BeckerT.BennettR. (2007). Employee attachment and deviance in organizations. In FoxJ.CooperC.KlimonskiR. (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Managing challenges and symptoms (pp. 136-152). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
5.
BokeK.NallaM. K. (2009). Police organizational culture and job satisfaction: A comparison of law enforcement officers’ perceptions in two midwestern states in the U.S. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 11(1), 55-73.
6.
BorinsS. (2000). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review, 60, 498-507.
7.
BourdieuP. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Malden, MA: Polity.
8.
BovensM.ZouridisS. (2002). From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: How information technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62, 174-184.
9.
BowenD. E.LawlerE. E. (1992). The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), 31-39.
10.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 413-440.
11.
BriggsS. R.CheekJ. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106-148.
12.
BrowningV. (2008). An exploratory study into deviant behaviour in the service encounter: How and why front-line employees engage in deviant behaviour. Journal of Management and Organization, 14(4), 451-471.
13.
ButterfieldR. (2004). The new public management and the UK Police Service. Public Management Review, 6(3), 395-415.
14.
ButterfieldR.EdwardsC.WoodwallJ. (2009). The new public management in the UK police service: The role of the police sergeant in the implementation of performance management. In BeattieR.OsbourneS. (Eds.), Human resource management in the public sector (pp. 93-115). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
CaillierJ. G. (2015). Transformational leadership and whistle-blowing attitudes: Is this relationship mediated by organizational commitment and public service motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(4), 458-475.
16.
CameronK. S.CazaA. (2004). Introduction: Contributions to the discipline of positive organizational scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 731-739.
17.
CanalesR. (2011). Rule bending, sociological citizenship, and organizational contestation in microfinance. Regulation & Governance, 5, 90-117.
18.
CazaA.CameronK. S. (2009). Positive organizational scholarship: What does it achieve? In CleggS. R.CooperC. L. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 99-116). London, England: Sage.
19.
ChoiM.RuonaW. E. A. (2010). Individual readiness for organizational change and its implications for human resource and organization development. Human Resource Development Review, 10(1), 46-73.
20.
CohenS.EimickeW. (1995). The new effective public manager: Achieving success in a changing government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
CopeS.LeishmanF.StarieP. (1997). Globalization, new public management and the enabling state futures of police management. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10(6), 444-460.
22.
CortinaL. M.MagleyV. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 247-265.
23.
DeciE.RyanR. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
24.
DeHart-DavisL. (2007). The unbureaucratic personality. Public Administration Review, 67, 892-904.
25.
DeHart-DavisL. (2009). Green tape and public employee rule abidance: Why organizational rule attributes matter. Public Administration Review, 69, 901-910.
26.
DenhardtR. B.DenhardtJ. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60, 549-559.
27.
DickG. P. M. (2011). The influence of managerial and job variables on organizational commitment in the police. Public Administration, 89(2), 557-576.
28.
DworkinT. M.BaucusM. S. (1998). Internal vs. external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowering processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1281-1298.
29.
EvansT.HarrisJ. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 871-895.
30.
FarrarD. E.GlauberR. R. (1967). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: The problem revisited. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(1), 92-107.
31.
FaullA. (2010, March). Missing the target: When measuring performance undermines police effectiveness. South African Crime Quarterly, 31, 19-25.
32.
FeeneyM. K.DeHart-DavisL. (2009). Bureaucracy and public employee behavior: A case of a local government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29, 311-326.
33.
FeltesT. (2002). Community-oriented policing in Germany: Training and education. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25, 48-59.
34.
FlemingJ.LaffertyG. (2009). New management techniques and restructuring for accountability in Australian police organisations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 23(2), 154-168.
35.
FreseM.GiardiniA. (2006). Eigeninitiative als positives Verhalten in Organisationen. In RinglstetterM.KaiserS.Müller-SeitzG. (Eds.), Positives management (pp. 53-70). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
36.
FullerJ. B.MarlerL. E.HesterK. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1089-1120.
37.
GalperinB. L. (2002). Determinants of deviance in the workplace: An empirical examination in Canada and Mexico (Ph.D. Thesis). Concordia University, Quebec, Canada.
38.
GalperinB. L. (2012). Exploring the nomological network of workplace deviance: Developing and validating a measure of constructive deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2988-3025.
39.
GalperinB. L.BurkeR. J. (2006). Uncovering the relationship between workaholism and workplace destructive and constructive deviance: An exploratory study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 331-347.
40.
GiangrecoA.PecceiR. (2005). The nature and antecedents of middle manager resistance to change: Evidence from an Italian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(10), 1812-1829.
41.
GradyD. O.TaxP. C. (1996). Entrepreneurial bureaucrats and democratic accountability: The experience at the state level. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 16(5), 5-14.
42.
GuyerS. (2013). Above and beyond bureaucracy: Examining the association between motivation and prosocial behavior in the United States border patrol. Haverford, PA: Haverford College.
43.
HendersonA. C. (2013). Examining policy implementation in health care: Rule abidance and deviation in emergency medical services. Public Administration Review, 73, 799-809.
44.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in forms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
45.
HoltD. T.ArmenakisA. A.FeildH. S.HarrisS. G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 232-255.
46.
HoqueZ.ArendsS.AlexanderR. (2004). Policing the police service: A case study of the rise of “new public management” within an Australian police service. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(1), 59-84.
47.
JohnstonL. (1992). British policing in the nineties: Free market and strong state?International Criminal Justice Review, 2(1), 1-18.
48.
JonesC. (2001). Voices from the front line: State social workers and new labour. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 547-562.
49.
KeiserL. R.SossJ. (1998). With good cause: Bureaucratic discretion and the politics of child support enforcement. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1133-1156.
50.
LeavittW. M.JohnsonG. (1998). Employee discipline and the post-bureaucratic public organization: A challenge in the change process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18(2), 73-81.
51.
LePineJ. A.Van DyneL. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868.
52.
LePineJ. A.van DyneL. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326-336.
53.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
54.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 329-358.
55.
MeyersM.Lehmann-NielsenV. (2012). Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In PetersB. G.PierreJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public administration (2nd ed., pp. 305-318). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
56.
MorrisonE. W. (2006). Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Management, 32(1), 5-28.
57.
MorrisonE. W.MillikenF. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
58.
MorrisonE.PhelpsC. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
59.
NikolaouI.VakolaM.BourantasD. (2008). Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees’ voice behavior. Personnel Review, 37, 666-679.
60.
OberfieldZ. W. (2009). Rule following and discretion at government’s frontlines: Continuity and change during organization socialization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 735-755.
61.
O’LearyR. (2010). Guerrilla employees: Should managers nurture, tolerate, or terminate them?Public Administration Review, 70(1), 8-19.
PalumboD.Maynard-MoodyS. (1991). Contemporary public administration. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing Group.
64.
PollittC. (2000). Is the emperor in his underwear?Public Management Review, 2, 181-200.
65.
PortilloS. (2011). The paradox of rules: Rules as resources and constraints. Administration & Society, 44, 87-108.
66.
PortilloS.DeHart-DavisL. (2009). Gender and organizational rule abidance. Public Administration Review, 69, 339-347.
67.
PremeauxS. F.BedeianA. G. (2003). Breaking the silence: The moderating effects of self-monitoring in predicting speaking up in the workplace. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1537-1562.
68.
RobbinsD. L.GalperinB. L. (2010). Constructive deviance: Striving toward organizational change in healthcare. Journal of Management and Marketing, 5(1), 1-11.
69.
RobinsonS. L.BennettR. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572.
70.
RobinsonS. L.O’Leary-KellyA. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658-672.
71.
SanthidranS.ChandranV. G. R.BorromeoJ. (2013). Enabling organizational change - leadership, commitment to change the mediating role of change readiness. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(2), 348-360.
72.
ScottP. G. (1997). Assessing determinants of bureaucratic discretion: An experiment in street-level decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 35-58.
73.
ScottS.BruceR. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
74.
SekerkaL. E.ZolinR. (2007). Rule-bending: Can prudential judgment affect rule compliance and values in the workplace?Public Policy, 9, 225-243.
75.
ShapiroD. L.KlebeL.TrevinoB. V. (1995). Correlates of employee theft: A multi-dimensional justice perspective. International Journal of Conflict Management, 6, 404-414.
76.
SpreitzerG. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.
77.
SpreitzerG. M.SonensheinS. (2003). Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing. In CameronR. Q.DuttonJ. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 207-224). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
78.
SpreitzerG. M.SonensheinS. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 828-847
79.
TaylorI. (2007). Discretion and control in education: The teacher as street-level bureaucrat. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35, 555-572.
80.
TummersL.SteijnB.BekkersV. (2012). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement public policies: Content, context, and personality characteristics. Public Administration, 90(3), 716-736.
81.
VaderaA.PrattM. G.MishraP. (2013). Constructive deviance in organizations: Integrating and moving forward. Journal of Management, 39, 1221-1276.
82.
VakolaM.BouradasD. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: An empirical investigation. Employee Relations, 27(5), 441-458.
83.
VakolaM.NikolaouI. (2005). Attitudes towards organizational change: What is the role of employees’ stress and commitment?Employee Relations, 27, 160-174.
84.
VaughanD. (1999). The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 271-305.
