Functional theory suggests that people choose activities based on their perception of how well the work matches their personal motives.This process implies that worker motivations vary by activity even when controlling for typical motivational antecedents. Although this perspective is common in the volunteering literature, the public service motivation (PSM) literature has not formally considered functional theory hypotheses.Yet PSM theory asserts a relationship not to government work itself, but to activities related to public service such as volunteering.This study evaluates functional theory in regard to PSM based on using a survey of recipients of the Daily Point of Light Award (DPOL) and the President’s Community Volunteer Award (PCV). After controlling for common PSM antecedents such as gender, level of education, religious participation, and age, PSM and its subdimensions exhibit some variance across volunteering domains (viz., religious, educational/school, human services, and other), though most differences involve religious organizations.
Bright, L. ( 2007). Does person-organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees ? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(4), 361-379.
2.
Brockett, W., Cooper, S., Kumbhakar, M., & Kwinn, D. ( 2004). Alternative statistical regression studies of the effects of joint and service specific advertising on military recruitment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1039-1048.
3.
Clary, E., Snyder, M., Ridge, R., Copeland, J., Stukas, A., Haugen, J., et al. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers-a functional approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1129-1150.
4.
Clary, E., Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. ( 1996). Volunteers, motivations: Findings from a national survey . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 485-505.
5.
Cnaan, R., Handy, F., & Wadsworth, M. ( 1996). Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(1), 364-383.
6.
Coursey, D., & Pandey, S. ( 2007). Public service motivation measurement: Testing an abridged version of Perry’s Scale. Administration and Society , 39(5), 547-568.
7.
Coursey, D., & Pandey, S. ( 2009). PSM and support for citizen participation: A test of Perry and Vandenabeele’s reformulation of PSM theory. Paper presented at the International Public Service Motivation conference, Bloomington, IN.
8.
Coursey, D., Perry, J., Brudney, J., & Littlepage, L. (2008a). Psychometric verification of Perry’s Public Service Motivation Instrument: Results for volunteer exemplars. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(1), 79-90.
9.
Coursey, D., Perry, J., Brudney, J., & Littlepage, L. (2008b). Deconstructing public service motivation: Vital measurement and discriminant validity issues in volunteerism. MinnowbrookIII, September 2008, Lake Placid, NY.
10.
Fiese, R. ( 2002). Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment ? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2, 8.
11.
Francois, P. ( 2000). Public service motivation as an augment for government provision. Journal of Public Economics, 78(3), 275-299.
12.
Hanssens, D., & Levien, H. ( 1983). An econometric study of recruitment marketing in the U.S. Navy. Management Science, 29(10), 1167-1184.
13.
Knoke, D., & Wood, J. ( 1981). Organized for action: Commitment in voluntary associations . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14.
Light, P. ( 1999). The new public service. Washington, DC: Brookings.
15.
Lovell, C., & Morey, R. ( 1991). The allocation of consumer incentives to meet simultaneous sales quotas: An application to U.S. Army recruiting. Management Science, 37(3), 350-367.
16.
McCurley, S., & Lynch, R. ( 2005). Keeping volunteers: A guide to retention. Olympia, WA: Fat Cat Publications.
17.
McKnight, P., McKnight, K., Sidani, S., & Figueredo, A. ( 2007). Missing data: A gentle introduction. New York: Guilford.
18.
Musick, M., & Wilson, J. ( 2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
19.
O’Brien, L., Crain, T., Omoto, L., & Snyder, M. ( 2000, May). Matching motivations to outcomes: Implications for persistence in service. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
20.
Pandey, S., & Stazyk, E. ( 2008). Antecedents and correlates of public service motivation . In J. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management (pp. 101-117). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
Perry, J. ( 1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.
22.
Perry, J. ( 1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2),181-197.
23.
Perry, J., Brudney, J., Coursey, D., & Littlepage, L. (2008). What drives morally committed citizens? A study of the antecedents of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 445-458.
24.
Perry, J., Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. ( 2009, June). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Paper presented at the International Public Service Motivation conference . Bloomington, IN.
25.
Perry, J., & Thomson, A. ( 2004). Civil service: What difference does it make?Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
26.
Perry, J., & Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Behavioral dynamics: Institutions, identities, and self-regulation. In J. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service, 56-79. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Perry, J., & Wise, L. ( 1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
28.
Smith, D. ( 1982). Altruism, volunteers, and volunteerism. In J. Harman (Ed.), Volunteerism in the eighties . Washington, DC: University Press American.
29.
Snyder, M., Clary, E., & Stukas, A. ( 2000). The functional approach to volunteerism. In G. Maio & J. Olson (Ed.), Why we evaluate (pp. 365-393). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. ( 1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 883-947). New York: Random House.
31.
Snyder, M., Omoto, A., & Lindsay, J. ( 2004). Sacrificing time and effort for the good of others: The benefits and costs of volunteerism. In A. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 444-468). New York: Guilford.
32.
Steinhaus, C., & Perry, J. ( 1996). Organizational commitment: Does sector matter? Public Productivity and Management Review, 19(3), 278-288.
33.
Stukas, A., Worth, K., Clary, E., & Snyder, M. ( 2009). The matching of motivations in affordances in the volunteer environment: An index for assessing the impact of multiple matches on volunteer outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 5-28.
34.
Sundeen, R., (1992). Differences in personal goals and attitudes among volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 271-291.
35.
Sundeen, R. ( 1990). Family life course status and volunteer behavior: Implications for the single parent. Sociological Perspectives, 33(4), 483-500.
36.
Wilson, J., & Musick. M. ( 1999). Attachment to volunteering. Sociological Forum, 14(2), 243-272.
37.
Wright, B., & Pandey, S. ( 2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person-organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration and Society, 40(5), 502-521.
38.
Wuthnow, R. ( 1991). Acts of compassion. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
39.
Wuthnow, R. ( 1995). Learning to care: Elementary kindness in an age of indifference . New York: Oxford University Press .
