Some authors have claimed that ambiguous goals frustrate public service motivation (PSM). This study uses data from the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)1 to develop organizational goal ambiguity measures for U.S. federal agencies. These measures, from this very separate and independent source, are then significantly and negatively related to a variable measured by a questionnaire item on the U.S. Merit System Protection Board’s 2005 Merit Principles Survey. The item asks respondents about whether they are motivated to do a good job by their duty as a public employee. Responses on this item appear relevant to PSM, but because the question does not fully represent more elaborate measures of PSM, we call the variable as “public duty motivation.” Public duty motivation also relates significantly and positively to employees’ Merit Principles Survey responses about the specificity of their job goals and of their agency’s mission, and about job-goal importance and job-goal commitment.
Allison, G.T. ( 1983). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In J. L. Perry & K. L. Kraemer (Eds.), Public management (pp. 72-92). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
2.
Alonso, P., & Lewis, G.B. ( 2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the federal sector. American Review of Public Administration , 31, 363-380.
3.
Bandura, A. ( 1989). Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 15-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. ( 1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017-1028.
5.
Baron, R.S., Vandello, J.A., & Brunsman, B. ( 1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915-927.
6.
Blau, P.M. ( 1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relations in two government agencies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Boyne, G.A., & Chen, A.A. ( 2007). Performance targets and public service improvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 455-477.
8.
Brewer, G.A., Selden, S.C., & Facer Ii, R.L. (2000). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review , 60, 254.
9.
Buchanan, B. ( 1974). Government managers, business executives, and organizational commitment. Public Administration Review, 34, 339-347.
10.
Buchanan, B. ( 1975). Red-tape and the service ethic. Administration and Society, 6, 423-444.
11.
Chun, Y.H., & Rainey, H.G. ( 2005a). Goal ambiguity in U.S. Federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 1-30.
12.
Chun, Y.H., & Rainey, H.G. ( 2005b). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. Federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 529-557.
13.
Dahl, R.A., & Lindblom, C.E. (1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
14.
DeHart-Davis, L., Marlowe, J., & Pandey, S.K. ( 2006). Gender dimensions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 66, 873-887.
15.
Downs, A. ( 1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
16.
Drucker, P.F. ( 1980). The deadly sins in public administration. Public Administration Review, 40(2), 103-106.
17.
Erez, M., Earley, P.C., & Hulin, C.L. ( 1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two-step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 50-66.
18.
Feeney, M.K. ( 2008). Sector perceptions among state-level public managers . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 465-494.
19.
Foy, P. ( 2004). Intraclass correlation and variance components as population attributes and measures of sampling efficiency in pirls 2001. Paper presented at the IEA International Research Conference, Nicosia, Cyprus.
20.
Grant, A.M. ( 2008). Employees without a cause: The motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 48-66.
21.
Grizzle, G.A. ( 1982). Measuring state and local government performance: Issues to resolve before implementing a performance measurement system. State & Local Government Review, 14(3), 132-136.
22.
Grizzle, G.A. ( 2002). Performance measurement and dysfunction: The dark side of quantifying work. Public Performance & Management Review , 25, 363-369.
23.
Heinrich, C.J. ( 2003). Measuring public sector performance and effectiveness . In G. B. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 25-37). London, UK: SAGE.
24.
Heinrich, C.J. ( 2007). False or fitting recognition? The use of high performance bonuses in motivating organizational achievements. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 281-304.
25.
Houston, D.J. ( 2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 713.
26.
Houston, D.J. ( 2006). "Walking the walk" Of public service motivation: Public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 67.
27.
Katzell, R.A., & Thompson, D.E. (1990). Work motivation: Theory and practice. American Psychologist, 45(2), 144-153.
28.
Khademian, A.M. ( 1995). Reinventing a government corporation: Professional priorities and a clear bottom line. Public Administration Review, 55(1), 17-28.
29.
Lan, Z., & Rainey, H.G. ( 1992). Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private, and hybrid organizations: More evidence on frequent assertions about differences . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 5-28.
30.
Lee, J.W., Rainey, H.G., & Chun, Y.H. ( 2009). Of politics and purpose: Political salience and goal ambiguity of us federal agencies. Public Administration, 87, 457-484.
31.
Lee, J.W., Rainey, H.G., & Chun, Y.H. ( 2010). Goal ambiguity, work complexity, and work routineness in federal agencies. American Review of Public Administration , 40, 284-308.
32.
Lee, T.W., Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. ( 1989). Goal setting theory and job performance. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 291-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Locke, E.A. ( 2004). Guest editor’s introduction: Goal-setting theory and its applications to the world of business. Academy of Management Executive, 18(4), 124-125.
34.
Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. ( 1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35.
Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. ( 2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist , 57, 705-717.
Long, J.S., & Freese, J. ( 2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
38.
Lowi, T.J. ( 1979). The end of liberalism. New York, NY : Norton.
39.
Lynn, L.E. ( 1981). Managing the public’s business. New York, NY: Basic Books.
40.
Matland, R.E. ( 1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 145-174.
41.
McGraw, K.O., & Wong, S.P. ( 1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30-46.
42.
Mitchell, T.R. ( 1997). Matching motivational strategies with organizational contexts. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 57-150). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
43.
Moynihan, D.P., & Pandey, S.K. ( 2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40-53.
44.
Paarlberg, L.E., Perry, J.L., & Hondeghem, A. ( 2008). Public service motivation and interpersonal citizenship behavior in public organizations: Testing a preliminary model. In J. L. Perry & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service, 268-293. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45.
Pandey, S.K., Wright, B.E., & Moynihan, D.P. (2008). Public service motivation and interpersonal citizenship behavior in public organizations: Testing a preliminary model. International Public Management Journal , 11(1), 89-108.
46.
Perry, J.L. ( 1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5.
47.
Perry, J.L. ( 1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 181-197.
48.
Perry, J.L. ( 2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 471.
49.
Perry, J.L., & Hondeghem, A. ( 2008). Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 3-12.
50.
Perry, J.L., & Porter, L.W. ( 1982). Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 89-98.
51.
Perry, J.L., & Wise, L.R. ( 1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367-373.
52.
Rainey, H.G. ( 1983). Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals, and individual roles. Administration & Society , 15, 207-242.
53.
Rainey, H.G. ( 1993). A theory of goal ambiguity in public organizations. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Research in public administration (Vol. 2, pp. 121-166). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
54.
Rainey, H.G., & Jung, C.S. ( 2010). Extending goal ambiguity research in government: From organizational goal ambiguity to programme goal ambiguity. In R. M. Walker, G. A. Boyne, & G. A. Brewer (Eds.), Public management and performance, 34-59. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Rainey, H.G., Pandey, S., & Bozeman, B. ( 1995). Research note: Public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55, 567-574.
56.
Rainey, H.G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1-32.
57.
Scott, P.G., & Pandey, S.K. ( 2005). Red tape and public service motivation: Findings from a national survey of managers in state health and human services agencies . Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25, 155-180.
58.
Selden, C.S., & Brewer, G.A. ( 2000). Work motivation in the senior executive service: Testing the high performance cycle theory. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 10, 531.
59.
Shamir, B. ( 1991). Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. Organization Studies, 12, 405.
60.
Steijn, B. ( 2008). Person-environment fit and public service motivation . International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 13-27.
61.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2005 ). Accomplishing our mission: Results of the merit principles survey 2005. Washington, D.C : U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.
62.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2006 ). Guidance for completing 2006 parts. Washington, D.C: Executive Office of the President, U. S. Office of Management and Budget.
63.
Vancouver, J.B., & Schmitt, N.W. ( 1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333-352.
64.
Vandenabeele, W. ( 2008). Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: Corroborating and extending Perry’s measurement instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11, 143-167.
65.
Weiss, J.A., & Piderit, S.K. ( 1999). The value of mission statements in public agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 193-223.
66.
Wildavsky, A. ( 1979). Speaking truth to power. Boston, MA : Little, Brown.
67.
Wilson, J.Q. ( 1989). Bureaucracy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
68.
Wright, B.E. ( 2001). Public sector work motivation: A review of the current literature model and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 559-586.
69.
Wright, B.E. ( 2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter? Public Administration Review, 67(1), 54-64.
