Ironically, by the end of the first year of the Obama administration, President George W. Bush appears to have gained an indirect impact on public personnel policy through his appointments of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito. In cases involving public personnel issues, both jurists have supported Bush’s preferences with respect to strict construction, executive power, and the use of racial and ethnic preferences. With one Obama appointee on the Supreme Court and another nominated, the prospects for the durability of that legacy in pursuit of “big government conservatism” are unclear. Nevertheless, this article’s analysis of Bush’s appointment “power in use” comports with findings regarding judicial appointee loyalty to presidential agendas that have emerged in recent years. It also suggests that further research on presidential appointments of federal judges and justices is needed and may demonstrate that the appointment power is an important determinant of public sector personnel policy in the United States.
Abraham, H. ( 1985). Justices and presidents. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
Adarand Constructors v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995).
3.
Akin, G.S.H., & Feld, L.L.P. ( 2009, June 30). Memorandum: end of term statistical analysis-October term 2008. Retrieved June 30, 2009, from http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/summary-memo-final.pdf
4.
American Bar Association. (2006). Task force on presidential signing statements and the separation of powers doctrine: Report. Available from http://www.abanet.org/op/signingstatements/ (Task Force Report with Recommendations)
5.
Associated Press. (2000, October 25). George W. Bush on affirmative action: Affirmative access means a fair shot for everyone. Retrieved October 25, 2000, from http://www.issues2000.org/George_W__Bush_Civil_Rights.htm#Affirmative_Action
6.
Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001).
7.
Baum, L. ( 1997). The puzzle of judicial behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
9.
Brenes v. City of New York, U.S. App. Lexis 6270 (2009).
10.
Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U.S. 194 (2004).
11.
Commission on Presidential Debates. (2000). October 3, 2000 transcript, The first Gore-Bush presidential debate. Retrieved October 3, 2000, from http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=october-3-2000-transcript
12.
Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983).
13.
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001).
14.
County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998).
15.
Dow Jones and Company v. U.S. Department of Justice, 880. F. Supp. 145 (1995).
16.
Epstein, L., & Segal, J.A. ( 2009). Nominating federal judges and justices. In G. C. Edwards III & W. G. Howell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the American presidency (pp. 625-664). New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Epstein, L., Segal, J., Spaeth, H., & Walker, T. ( 2003). The Supreme Court compendium. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
18.
Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006).
19.
Gerhardt, M. ( 2003). The federal appointments process. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20.
Goldstein, T. ( 2009, May 15). Judge Sotomayor’s appellate opinions in civil cases. Scotus. Retrieved May 15, 2009 , from http://www.scotusblog.com/2009/05/judge-sotomayorsappellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/
21.
Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004).
22.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
23.
Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982).
24.
Hope v. Pelzer, 537 U.S. 730 (2002).
25.
Jamison, F. ( 2005, October 13). Did Bush promise to appoint a justice like Scalia? Media Matters for America.
26.
Lasky, E. ( 2008, May 5). Obama’s judicial philosophy still a puzzle . American Thinker. Retrieved May 5, 2008, from http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/05/obamas_judicial_philosophy_sti.html
27.
Lithwick, D. ( 2010, May 13). What does he see in her? What Obama’s choice of Kagan tells us about his own judicial philosophy. Slate . Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http://www.slate.com/id/2253822
28.
Malesko v. Correctional Services Corporation, 229 F.3d 374 (2000).
29.
Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988).
30.
Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980).
31.
Papineau v. Parmley, 465 F.3d 46 (2006).
32.
Pappas v. Giuliani, 290 F.3d 143 (2002).
33.
Pfiffner, J. ( 2008). Power play. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34.
Raniola v. Police Commissioner William Bratton, 243 F.3d 610 (2001).
35.
Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987).
36.
Ricci v. DeStefano, 530 F.3d 87 (2008).
37.
Ricci v. DeStefano, 129 S.Ct. 2658 (2009).
38.
Rosenbloom, D.H. ( 1977). Federal equal employment opportunity. New York: Praeger.
39.
Rosenbloom, D.H. ( 1978). The Burger court and the public employee. Southern Review of Public Administration, 2, 239-259.
40.
Rosenbloom, D.H. ( 2008). President George W. Bush’s theory of a unitary executive branch and the rule of law in the United States. Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law, 1, 227-254.
41.
Rosenbloom, D.H. ( 2010). Reevaluating executive-centered public administrative theory. In R. F. Durant (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Rosenbloom, D.H., & Bailey, M. ( 2005). Public administrators’ liability for "constitutional torts." In N. Riccucci (Ed.), Public personnel management (4th ed., pp. 126-143). White Plains, NY: Longman.
43.
Rosenbloom, D.H., O’Leary, R., & Chanin, J. ( 2010). Public administration and law (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
44.
Ruotolo v. City of New York, 514 F.3d 184 (2008).
45.
Savage, C. ( 2009, May 10). Scouring Obama’s past for clues on judiciary . New York Times. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B04E7D81E39F933A25756C0A96F9C8B63
46.
Savage, C. ( 2010, May 21). Kagan’s writings back wider executive powers . New York Times. Retrieved May 21, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/us/politics/22power.html
47.
Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007).
48.
Segal, J., & Spaeth, H. ( 2002). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Singh v. City of New York, 525 F.3d 361 (2008).
50.
Stohr, G. ( 2010, May 11). Kagan’s "thin" legal record hints she will ally with high court Democrats. Bloomberg. Retrieved May 11, 2010, from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-05-11/kagan-s-thin-legal-record-hints-she-will-ally-with-high-court-democrats.html
51.
Tigue v. U.S. Department of Justice, 312 F.3d 70 (2002).
52.
Tribe, L.H. ( 1985). God save this honorable court: How the choice of Supreme Court justices shapes our history. New York: Random House.
53.
United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149 (1987).
54.
United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996).
55.
Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661 (1994).
56.
Whitmeyer, J. ( 2006). Presidential power over Supreme Court decisions. Public Choice, 127, 97-121.
57.
Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996).
58.
Wilkie v. Robbins, 551 U.S. 537 (2007).
59.
Wood v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 432 F.3d (2005).
