This study examines the effect of grievances on organizational effectiveness characteristics. Using data from the 2000 Merit Principles Survey, the author constructs three measures of organizational effectiveness characteristics: attitudinal indices on performance appraisal, job satisfaction, and efficacy. These serve as dependent variables in regression analyses testing perceptions of adverse events (fair treatment and being misled), filing of formal complaints, and being subject to retaliation. This allows an examination of whether withdrawal (a decline in organizational effectiveness characteristics) is because of the initial event (measured as lack of fair treatment or being misled) or because of participation in the formal grievance process or later retaliation.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
2.
Boswell, W.R., & Olson-Buchanan, J.B. (2004). Experiencing mistreatment at work: The role of grievance filing, nature of mistreatment, and employee withdrawal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 129-139.
3.
Cozzetto, D. (1991). Public sector grievances: The case of North Dakota . Review of Public Personnel Administration, 12(1), 5-13.
4.
Daley, D.M. (2003). The trials and tribulations of performance appraisal: Problems and prospects on entering the twenty-first century. In S. W. Hays & R. C. Kearney (Eds.), Public personnel administration (pp. 154-166). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Daley, D.M. (2005). Designing effective performance appraisal systems . In S. E. Condrey (Ed.), Handbook of human resource management in government (pp. 499-527). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Duane, M.J. (1991). To grieve or not to grieve: Why reduce it to writing?Public Personnel Management, 20(1), 83-90.
7.
Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 3, pp. 141-183). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
8.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130.
9.
Fryxell, G.E., & Gordon, M.E. (1989). Workplace justice and job satisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with union and management. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 851-866.
10.
Greenberg, J. (1988). Cultivating an image of justice: Looking fair on the job. Academy of Management Executive, 2(2), 155-158.
11.
Haraway, W.M., III. (2002). Rediscovering process values in employee grievance procedures. Administration & Society, 34(5), 499-521.
12.
Haraway, W.M., III. (2005). Employee grievance programs: Understanding the nexus between workplace justice, organizational legitimacy and successful organizations. Public Personnel Management, 34(4), 329-342.
13.
Harrison, D.A., Newman, D.A., & Roth, P.L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305-325.
14.
Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and statesCambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
15.
Kellough, J.E. (2006). Employee performance appraisal in the public sector: Uses and limitations. In N. M. Riccucci (Ed.), Public personnel management: Current concerns, future challenges (pp. 177-189). New York: Longman.
16.
Klaas, B.S., & DeNisi, A.S. (1989). Managerial reactions to employee dissent: The impact of grievance activity on performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 705-717.
17.
Klingner, D., & Nalbandian, J. (1985). Public personnel management: Contexts and strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Lewin, D. (1987). Conflict resolution in the nonunion firm: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 465-502.
19.
Lewin, D., & Peterson, R.B. (1988). The modern grievance procedure in the United States: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Westport, CT: Quorum.
20.
Lewin, D., & Peterson, R.B. (1999). Behavioral outcomes of grievance activity. Industrial Relations, 38, 554-576.
Stajkovic, A.D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
23.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2003 ). The federal workforce for the 21st century: Results of the Merit Principles Survey 2000. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
