This article examines the relationship between red tape and public-service motivation. Using a recent national survey of public managers in various state health and human service organizations, the authors examine whether perceptions of red tape are determined by differences in the level of public-service motivation. Across a variety of dependent measures, the results showed a consistent linkage between managerial perceptions of red tape and public-service motivation. Managers reporting higher levels of public-service motivation were less likely to perceive high levels of red tape. Among the dimensions of public-service motivation, attraction to public policy making provided the greatest influence on perceptions of red tape.
Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intraorganizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33(6), 912-930.
2.
Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
3.
American Public Human Services Association. (2001). Public human services directory 2001-2002. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Baldwin, J. (1990). Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: Their impact on motivation. American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 7-28.
5.
Behn, R. (1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review, 55(4), 313-324.
6.
Blau, P. (1968). The hierarchy of authority in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 73(4), 453-467.
7.
Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government “red tape”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273-303.
8.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Bozeman, B., Reed, P., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24(3), 290-322.
10.
Bozeman, B., & Scott, P. (1996). Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: Untangling conceptual knots. American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 1-17.
11.
Brewer, G., & Selden, S. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 413-440.
12.
Brewer, G., Selden, S., & Facer, R. (2000). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 254-264.
13.
Brudney, J., Hebert, F., & Wright, D. (1999). Reinventing government in the American states: Measuring and explaining administrative reform. Public Administration Review, 59(1), 19-28.
14.
Buchanan, B. (1975). Red tape and the service ethic: Some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Administration & Society, 6(4), 423-444.
15.
Burke, B., & Wright, D. (2002). Reassessing and reconciling reinvention in the American states: Exploring state administrative performance. State and Local Government Review, 34(1), 7-19.
16.
Crewson, P. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 499-518.
17.
Davies, D. (1971). The efficiency of public versus private firms: The case of Australia’s two airlines. Journal of Law and Economics, 14(1), 149-165.
18.
DeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S. K. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived-rule dysfunction alienate managers?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 1-16.
19.
Frederickson, H. G., & Hart, D. K. (1985). The public service and patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45(5), 547-553.
20.
Gabris, G., & Simo, G. (1995). Public sector motivation as an independent variable affecting career decisions. Public Personnel Management, 24(1), 33-51.
21.
Goodnow, F. (1900). Politics and administration. New York: Russell & Russell.
22.
Gore, A. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less: Report of the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23.
Gouldner, A. (1952). Red tape as a social problem. In R. K. Merton, A. P. Gray, B.Hockey, &H.C. Selvin (Eds.), Reader in bureaucracy (pp. 410-418). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
24.
Greiner, L. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4), 37-46.
25.
Gulick, L., & Urwick, L. (Eds.). (1937). Papers on the science of administration. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
26.
Hall, R. (1963). The concept of bureaucracy: An empirical assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 69(1), 32-40.
27.
Houston, D. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713-728.
28.
Jurkiewicz, C., Massey, T. K., Jr., & Brown, R. (1998). Motivation in public and private organizations. Public Productivity and Management Review, 21(3), 230-250.
29.
Kaufman, H. (1977). Red tape: Its origins, uses, and abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30.
Kilpatrick, F., Cummings, M., & Jennings, M. (1964). The image of the federal service. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
31.
Lan, Z., & Rainey, H. (1992). Goals, rules, and effectiveness in public, private, and hybrid organizations: More evidence on frequent assertions about differences. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 5-28.
32.
Maidani, E. (1991). A comparative study of Herzberg’s two-factor theory of job satisfaction among public and private sectors. Public Personnel Management, 20(4), 441-454.
33.
Merton, R. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18(4), 560-568.
34.
Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (in press). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review.
35.
Naff, K., & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5-16.
36.
Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine.
37.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Plume.
38.
Pandey, S. K., & Garnett, J. L. (in press). Exploring public sector communication performance: Testing a model and drawing implications. Public Administration Review.
39.
Pandey, S. K., & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779-799.
40.
Pandey, S. K., Kingsley, G. A., & Scott, P. G. (2001, October). Coping with red tape: Does public service motivation separate the victor from the vanquished? Paper presented at the 6th National Public Management Research conference, Bloomington, IN.
41.
Pandey, S. K., & Scott, P. G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553-580.
42.
Pandey, S. K., & Welch, E. W. (in press). Beyond stereotypes: A multi-stage model managerial perceptions of red tape. Administration & Society.
43.
Perry, J. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.
44.
Perry, J. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 181-198.
45.
Perry, J, & Wise, L. (1990). The motivational basis of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
46.
President’s Committee on Administrative Management. (1937). Administrative management in the government of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47.
Pugh, D., Hickson, D., Hinings, C., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 65-91.
48.
Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33-51.
49.
Rainey, H. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16(4), 288-302.
50.
Rainey, H. (1983). Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals, and individual roles. Administration & Society, 15(2), 207-242.
51.
Rainey, H., Backoff, R., & Levine, C. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233-244.
52.
Rainey, H., Pandey, S., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567-574.
53.
Rawls, J., Ulrich, R., & Nelson, O. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering the profit and nonprofit sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 616-622.
54.
Rosenfeld, R. (1984). An expansion and application of Kaufman’s model of red tape: The case of community development block grants. Western Political Quarterly, 37(4), 603-620.
55.
Schuster, J. (1974). Management compensation policy and the public interest. Public Personnel Management, 3(6), 510-523.
56.
Tullock, G. (1970). Private wants, public means. New York: Basic Books.
57.
Walsh, J., & Dewar, R. (1987). Formalization and the organizational life cycle. Journal of Management Studies, 24(3), 215-231.
58.
Weiner, B. (1986) An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
59.
Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222.
60.
Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the people or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, hybrid sector, and business managers. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14(4), 369-383.
61.
Wright, B. (2001). Public-sector work motivation: A review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 559-586.
