New Directions in Staff Consultation and Communication in the British Civil Service and Prison Service

Abstract

This article considers the changing nature of partnership, staff consultation, and communication practices in the British civil service and prison service. These changes began in the 1980s with the development of new public management and have continued under the Labour government’s rubric of public sector modernization. The article examines and reviews current attempts to create new forms of partnership at work, between public employers, trade unions, and individual employees, and other staff consultation and communication processes in response to modernization. The research is based on telephone interviews conducted in 2001 with senior managers and trade union officials in the civil service and prison service and supplementary documentary sources provided by the respondents.

Keywords

staff consultation communication partnership new public management civil service prison service

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bryson, C. , Gallagher, J. , Jackson, M. , Leopold, J. , & Tuck, K. (1993). Decentralisation of collective bargaining: Local authority opt-outs. Local Government Studies, 19(4), 558-583.

Cabinet Office . (1999a). Civil service reform: A report by Sir Richard Wilson. London: Stationery Office.

Cabinet Office . (1999b). Modernising government: Cm 3410. London: Stationery Office.

Corby, S. (2002). On parole: Prison service industrial relations. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(4), 286-297.

Corby, S. , Millard, L. , White, G. , Druker, J. , & Meerabeau, E. (2001). Innovations in pay and grading in NHS trusts. London: Work and Employment Research Unit, University of Greenwich.

Cully, M. , Woodland, S. , O’Reilly, A. , & Dix, G. (1999). Britain at work. London: Routledge.

Employment Department . (1992). People, jobs and opportunity. London: Stationary Office.

Farnham, D. (1979). Sixty years of Whitleylism. Whitley Bulletin: Journal of the Civil Service National Whitley Council (Staff Side), 59(1), 9-9.

Farnham, D. , & Horton, S. (1996). Managing people in the new public services. London: Macmillan.

10.

Farnham, D. , Horton, S. , & White, G. (2003). Organizational change and staff participation and involvement in Britain’s public services. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(6), 434-445.

11.

Farnham, D. , & McNeill, J. (1997). Pay delegation in next steps agencies: Some initial research findings. Public Policy and Administration, 12(4), 35-46.

12.

Horton, S. (2000). Human resources flexibilities in UK public services. In D. Farnham & S. Horton (Eds.) Human resources flexibilities in the public services: International perspectives (pp. 208-236). London: Macmillan.

13.

Kessler, I. (1991). Workplace industrial relations in local government. Employee Relations, 13(2), 1-36.

14.

Kessler, I. (1993). Pay determination in the British civil service since 1979. Public Administration, 71(3), 1-31.

15.

Prison Service . (2002a). Annual report and accounts. London: Home Office.

16.

Prison Service. (2002b). Internal communication report. Unpublished report. London: Home Office.

17.

Prison Service. (2002c). Partnership agreement. Unpublished document. London: Home Office.

18.

White, G. (1999). The remuneration of public servants: Fair pay or new pay? In S. Corby & G. White (Eds.), Employee relations in the public services: Themes and issues (pp. 185-224). London: Routledge.

19.

White, G. , Dennison, P. , Farnham, D. , & Horton, S. (2003, September). The prevalence of communication, involvement and participation practices in UK public services: Results of a survey. Paper presented to the Personnel Policy Study Group at the European Group of Public Administration Annual Conference, Oeiras, Portugal.

20.

White, G. , & Hutchinson, B. (1996). Local government. In D. Farnham & S. Horton (Eds.), Managing people in the public services (pp. 185-224). London: Macmillan.